Commenced in January 2007
Paper Count: 32131
Analysis of Synchronous Machine Excitation Systems: Comparative Study
Abstract:This paper presents the comparison and performance evaluation of synchronous machine excitation models. The two models, DC1A and AC4A, are among the IEEE standardized model structures for representing the wide variety of synchronous machine excitation systems. The performance evaluation of these models is done using SIMULINK simulation software. The simulation results obtained using transient analysis show that the DC1A excitation system is more reliable and stable than AC4A excitation system.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1130957Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 3708
 S. Schmuelling, C. Kreischer, and M. Gołebiowski, “Comparison of different methods for exciation of synchronous machines,” KOMEL, vol. 107, pp. 89–93, 2015.
 M. Catrinoiu, “Matlab/simulink model of a system for determining the angle of internal synchronous generators.”
 R. Jamil, I. Jamil, Z. Jinquan, L. Ming, W. Y. Dong, and R. Jamil, “Control and configuration of generator excitation system as current mainstream technology of power system,” Tc, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 1, 2013.
 “Ieee guide for synchronous generator modeling practices in stability analyses,” IEEE Std 1110-1991, pp. 1–, 1991.
 V. Jerkovi´c, K. Mikloˇsevi´c, and ˇ S. ˇ Zeljko, “Excitation system models of synchronous generator,” in SiP 2010 28th International Conference Science in Practice, 2010.
 “transistorized excitation systems for synchronous genertor,” (Date last accessed 15-Octorber-2016).
[Online]. Available: https://www.siemens.com.tr/i/content/3882 1 SipolCatalogue.pdf
 “Ieee recommended practice for excitation system models for power system stability studies,” IEEE Std 421.5-2005 (Revision of IEEE Std 421.5-1992), pp. 1–93, April 2006.
 P. Kundur, N. J. Balu, and M. G. Lauby, Power system stability and control. McGraw-hill New York, 1994, vol. 7.