Investigating Transformative Practices in the Bangladeshi Classroom

Authors: Rubaiyat Jahan, Nasreen Sultana Mitu

Abstract:

This paper examines the theoretical construct of transformative practices, and reports some evidence of transformative practices from a couple of Bangladeshi English teachers. The idea of transformative practices calls for teachers’ capabilities to invest their intellectual labor in teaching with an assumption that along with the academic advancement of the learners, it aims for the personal transformation for both the learners as well for themselves. Following an ethnographic research approach, data for this study were collected through in-depth interviews, informal talks and classroom observations for a period of one year. In relevance to the English classroom of the Bangladeshi context, from this study, references of transformative practices have been underlined from the participant teachers’ views on English language teaching as well as from their actual practices. According to data of this research, some evidence of transformative practices in the form of critical language awareness and personal theories of practices emerge from the participants’ articulation of the beliefs on teaching; and from the participant teachers’ classroom practices evidence of self-directed acts of teaching, self-directed acts of professional development, and liberatory autonomy have been highlighted as the reflections of transformative practices. The implication of this paper refers to the significance of practicing teachers’ articulation of beliefs and views on teaching along with their orientation to critical pedagogical relations.

Keywords: Critical language awareness, personal theories of practices, teacher autonomy, transformative practices.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1130639

References:

[1] E. Auerbach, "Making Meaning, Making Change. Participatory Curriculum Development for Adult ESL Literacy.", Language in Education: Theory & Practice, vol. 78, 1992.
[2] P. Benson, "Autonomy in language teaching and learning", Language Teaching, vol. 40, no. 01, pp. 21-40, 2007.
[3] S. Borg, "The impact of in-service teacher education on language teachers’ beliefs", System, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 370-380, 2011.
[4] S. Borg, "Language Teacher Cognition", in Second Language Teacher Education, A. Burns and J. C. Richards, Ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 163-171, 2009.
[5] S. Borg, Teacher Cognition and Language Education: Research and Practice, 1st ed. London: Continuum, 2006.
[6] P. Bourdieu, "The economics of linguistic exchanges", Social Science Information, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 645-668, 1977.
[7] A. Canagarajah, Resisting linguistic imperialism in English teaching, 1st ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.
[8] K. Ecclestone, Learning autonomy in post-16 education: the politics and practice of formative assessment, Abingdon, Oxon: RoutledgeFalmer, 2002.
[9] G. Fischman, "Afterword", in Critical Pedagogy in Uncertain Times, 1st ed., S. Macrine, Ed. London: Palgrave/Macmillan, 2017, pp. 207-215.
[10] H. Giroux, "Teachers as transformative intellectuals", Kaleidoscope: Contemporary and classic readings in education, pp. 35-40, 2010.
[11] H. Giroux, Teachers as intellectuals: Toward a critical pedagogy of learning, New York: Bergin & Garvey, 1988.
[12] M. Hammersley, "Ethnography", in International encyclopedia of education, 3rd ed., P. Peterson, E. Baker and B. McGaw, Ed. Oxford, England: Elsevier, 2010, pp. 386-439.
[13] M. Hawkins and B. Norton, "Critical language teacher education", in Cambridge guide to second language teacher education, A. Burns and J. Richards, Ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009, pp. 30-39.
[14] B. Kumaravadivelu, Language teacher education for a global society: A modular model for knowing, analyzing, recognizing, doing, and seeing, New York: Routledge, 2012.
[15] B. Kumaravadivelu, Understanding language teaching: From method to postmethod, New Jersey: LEA Publishers, 2006.
[16] B. Kumaravadivelu, "A Postmethod Perspective on English Language Teaching", World Englishes, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 539-550, 2003.
[17] B. Kumaravadivelu, "Toward a Postmethod Pedagogy", TESOL Quarterly, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 537-560, 2001.
[18] D. Little, "Learning as dialogue: The dependence of learner autonomy on teacher autonomy", System, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 175-181, 1995.
[19] A. Mahboob, B. Paltridge, A. Phakiti, E. Wagner, S. Starfield, A. Burns, R. Jones and P. De Costa, "TESOL Quarterly Research Guidelines", TESOL Quarterly, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 42-65, 2016.
[20] I. McGrath, "Teacher autonomy", in Learner autonomy, teacher autonomy: Future directions, B. Sinclair, I. McGrath and T. Lamb, Ed. London: Longman, 2000, pp. 100-110.
[21] J. Nespor, "Tangled up in school: politics, space, bodies, and signs in the educational process", Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1997.
[22] A. Pennycook, English and the discourses of colonialism, London: Routledge, 1998.
[23] A. Pennycook, "The Concept of Method, Interested Knowledge, and the Politics of Language Teaching", TESOL Quarterly, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 589-618, 1989.
[24] R. Phillipson, Linguistic imperialism, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.