The Impact of Innovation Best Practices in Economic Development
Innovation is the process of making changes, differences, and novelties in the products and services, adding values and business practices to create economic and social benefit. The purpose of this paper is to identify the strengths and weaknesses of innovation programs in developed and developing countries. We used a mixed-methods approach, quantitative as survey and qualitative as a multi-case study to examine innovation best practices in developed and developing countries. In addition, four case studies of innovation organisations based on the best practices and successful implementation in the developed and developing countries are selected for examination. The research findings provide guidance, suggestions, and recommendations for future implementation in developed and developing countries for practitioners such as policy makers, governments, funded organizations, and strategic institutions. In conclusion, innovation programs are vital tools for economic growth, knowledge, and technology transfer based on the several indicators such as creativity, entrepreneurship, role of government, role of university, strategic focus, new products, survival rate, job creation, start-up companies, and number of patents. The authors aim to conduct future research which will include a comparative study of innovation case studies between developed and developing countries for policy implications worldwide. The originality of this study makes a contribution to the current literature about the innovation best practice in developed and developing countries.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1130601Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 519
 Acs, Z.J. and Armington, C., ‘Employment growth and entrepreneurial activity in cities’, Regional Studies, Vol. 38(8), 911-927, 2004.
 Al-Mubaraki, H. and Busler, M., “Fostering the innovation and entrepreneurship in developing countries', International journal of Innovative Research in Management, Vol. 1(1), pp 67-73, 2012a.
 Al-Mubaraki, H. and Busler, M., 'Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Technology Commercialization in Developing Countries: A GCC Perspective in an International Context', European Journal of Business and Management, Vol. 4(19), pp 141-158, 2012b.
 Al-Mubaraki, H., Muhammad, A. and Busler, M., 'Innovation and Entrepreneurship Powerful Tools for a Modern Knowledge-Based Economy', 2015. Springer Publishers, www.springer.com.
 Al-Mubaraki, H., Muhammad, A.H. and Busler, M., 'Indicators of the Innovation: The case of the United Kingdom'. European Journal of Business and Management, Vol. 6(15), pp. 56-61, 2014.
 Al-Mubaraki, H., Sharp, J. and Busler, M. 'Incubator: Innovation and Technological Transfer', The Journal of American Academy of Business, Cambridge, Vol. 19(1), .pp. 209-215, 2013.
 Audretsch, D.B., ‘Sustaining innovation and growth: public policy support for entrepreneurship’, Industry and Innovation, Vol. 11(3), 167-191, 2004.
 Australia. Department of Education, Science and Training. Executive Summary (2002-2003), Backing Australia’s Ability: Real Results Real Jobs. Accessed on November 19, 2016. Available online at: http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/stioutlook2002nationalstpolicies.htm.
 Birch, D., ‘Job Generation in America: How our Smallest Companies Put the Most People to Work’, Free Press, New York, NY, 1987.
 Blackburn, R., Kitching, J., Hart, M., Brush, C. and Ceru, D., ‘Growth Challenges for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises: A UK-US Comparative Study’, Small Business Research Centre, Kingston University, Kingston upon Thames, 2008.
 Bryman, A. and Bell, E., ‘Business research methods’, Oxford University Press, USA, 2007.
 Canadian Science and Innovation Indicators Consortium, Canadian Scoreboards on S&T and its further Developments, 2004. Accessed on November 19, 2016. Available online at: http://www.csiic.ca/PDF/scoreboard.pdf.
 Carayannis, E.G., Campbell, D.F.J. and Rehman. S.S., ‘Happy accidents’: innovation-driven opportunities and perspectives for development in the knowledge economy, Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, A Systems View Across Time and Space, Vol. 4(7), 1-16, 2015.
 Cefis, E. and Marsili, O., ‘Survivor: the role of innovation in firm’s survival’, Research Policy, Vol. 35 (5), 626-641, 2006.
 Commission of the European Communities. European Innovation Scoreboard, Comparative Analysis of Innovation Performance. Commission Staff Working Paper, 2004. Accessed on November 19, 2016. Available online at: http://www.eumonitor.nl/9353000/1/j9vvik7m1c3gyxp/vi7jgsz8kvy0.
 Cornell University, INSEAD and WIPO, ‘Global Innovation Index’, Effective Innovation Policies for Development, Johnson Cornell University, 2015. Accessed on November 1, 2016. Available online at: www.globalinnovationindex.org.
 European Commission (EC), Innovation Union Scoreboard, Brussels: European Union, 2016. Accessed on November, 1, 2016. Available online at: http://ec.europa.eu/growth/industry/innovation/facts-figures/scoreboards/files/ius-2015_en.pdf
 Hadjimanolis, A. and Dickson, K., ‘Innovation strategies of SMEs in Cyprus, a small developing country’, International Small Business Journal, Vol. 18(4), 62-79, 2000.
 Huggins, R. and Johnston, A., ‘Knowledge networks in an uncompetitive region: SME innovation and growth’, Growth and Change, Vol. 40(2), 227-259, 2009.
 INFOSERV. Measuring Innovation Performance, Industry Digest, Information Services Division, National Library Board, Singapore.
 Jankowicz, A.D., ‘Business Research Projects’, 2005, International Thomson Business Press, 1995.
 King, N., ‘The Qualitative Research Interview’, In Cassell, C. and Symon, G. (Eds), Qualitative Methods in Organisational Research, Sage, London, 1994.
 OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). Frascati Manual 2015: Guidelines for collecting and reporting data on Research and Experimental Development, Paris: OECD Publishing, 2015. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264239012-en
 Parker, R., ‘The myth of the entrepreneurial economy: employment and innovation in small firms’, Work, Employment and Society, Vol. 15(2), 373-384. 2001.
 Porter, M.E. and Scott, S., ‘The New Challenge to America’s Prosperity: Findings from the Innovation Index, Council on Competitiveness', 1999. Accessed on November 19, 2016. Available online at: http://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Publication%20Files/Downloads_Porter_index1_el_be68d54c-4990-45da-88c0-ee754c99ffdb.pdf.
 Robertson, P., Smith, K. and von Tunzelmann, N., ‘Innovation in low and medium-technology industries’, Research Policy, Vol. 38(3), 441-446, 2009.
 Romijn, H. and Albaladejo, M., ‘Determinants of innovation capability in small electronics and software firms in southeast England’, Research Policy, Vol. 31(7), 1053-1067, 2002.
 Rosenbusch, N., Brinckman, J. and Bausch, A., ‘Is innovation always beneficial? A meta-analysis of the relationship between innovation and performance in SMEs’, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 26(4), 441-457, 2011.
 Smith, J.M., ‘Interviewing in Market and Social Research’, Routledge, London, 1972.
 Torrington, D., ‘Face to Face: Techniques for handling the personal encounter at work’, Gower Press, London, 1972.
 United Kingdom. HM Treasury. Science & Innovation Investment Framework 2004-2014, Spending Review: Science and Innovation, 2004. Accessed on November 19, 2016. Available online at: http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/spending_review/spend_sr04/associated_documents/spending_sr04_science.cfm.