Performance Assessment of the Gold Coast Desalination Plant Offshore Multiport Brine Diffuser during ‘Hot Standby’ Operation

Authors: M. J. Baum, B. Gibbes, A. Grinham, S. Albert, D. Gale, P. Fisher

Abstract:

Alongside the rapid expansion of Seawater Reverse Osmosis technologies there is a concurrent increase in the production of hypersaline brine by-products. To minimize environmental impact, these by-products are commonly disposed into open-coastal environments via submerged diffuser systems as inclined dense jet outfalls. Despite the widespread implementation of this process, diffuser designs are typically based on small-scale laboratory experiments under idealistic quiescent conditions. Studies concerning diffuser performance in the field are limited. A set of experiments were conducted to assess the near field characteristics of brine disposal at the Gold Coast Desalination Plant offshore multiport diffuser. The aim of the field experiments was to determine the trajectory and dilution characteristics of the plume under various discharge configurations with production ranging 66 – 100% of plant operative capacity. The field monitoring system employed an unprecedented static array of temperature and electrical conductivity sensors in a three-dimensional grid surrounding a single diffuser port. Complimenting these measurements, Acoustic Doppler Current Profilers were also deployed to record current variability over the depth of the water column and wave characteristics. Recorded data suggested the open-coastal environment was highly active over the experimental duration with ambient velocities ranging 0.0 – 0.5 m∙s^-1, with considerable variability over the depth of the water column observed. Variations in background electrical conductivity corresponding to salinity fluctuations of ± 1.7 g∙kg^-1 were also observed. Increases in salinity were detected during plant operation and appeared to be most pronounced 10 – 30 m from the diffuser, consistent with trajectory predictions described by existing literature. Plume trajectories and respective dilutions extrapolated from salinity data are compared with empirical scaling arguments. Discharge properties were found to adequately correlate with modelling projections. Temporal and spatial variation of background processes and their subsequent influence upon discharge outcomes are discussed with a view to incorporating the influence of waves and ambient currents in the design of brine outfalls into the future.

Keywords: Brine disposal, desalination, field study, inclined dense jets, negatively buoyant discharge.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1130527

References:

[1] L. O. Villacorte, S.A.A Tabatabai, N. Dhakal, G. Amy, J. C. Schippers, M. D. Kennedy, “Algal blooms: an emerging threat to seawater reverse osmosis desalination,” Desalination and Water Treatment, vol. 55, pp. 2601 – 2611, 2015.
[2] S. Lattemann, and T. Höpner, “Environmental impact and impact assessment of seawater desalination,” Desalination, vol. 220, no. (1–3), pp. 1-15, 2008.
[3] M. A. Zeitoun, W. F. Mcilhenny, and R. O. Reid, “Conceptual designs of outfall systems for desalting plants. Research and development progress (report no. 550),” United States Department of the Interior, 1st ed., 1970.
[4] P. J. W. Roberts, A. Ferrier and G. Daviero, “Mixing in inclined dense jets,” Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, vol. 123, pp. 693 – 699, 1997.
[5] C. C. K. Lai, J. H. W. Lee, “Initial mixing of inclined dense jet in perpendicular crossflow,” Environmental Fluid Mechanics, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 25 – 49, 2014.
[6] A. B. Pincince and E. J. List, “Disposal of brine into an estuary,” Journal (Water Pollution Control Federation), vol. 45, pp. 2335 – 2344, 1973.
[7] P. J. W. Roberts, and G. Toms, “Inclined dense jets in flowing current,” Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, vol. 113, pp. 323 – 340, 1987.
[8] P. J. W. Roberts, “Near field flow dynamics of concentrate discharges and diffuser design,” in Intakes and Outfalls for Seawater Reverse-Osmosis Desalination Facilities, T. M. Missimer, B. Jones, R. G. Maliver, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 2015, pp. 369 – 396.
[9] P. Baudish, “Design Considerations for Tunnelled Seawater Intakes,” in Intakes and Outfalls for Seawater Reverse-Osmosis Desalination Facilities, T. M. Missimer, B. Jones, R. G. Maliver, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 2015, pp. 19 – 38.
[10] O. Abessi, and P. J. W. Roberts, “Multiport diffusers for dense discharges,” Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, vol. 140, pp. 04014032, 2014.
[11] Geoscience Australia (2017). “Australian Geomagnetic Reference Field Values, for latitude: -28.1325°, longitude: 153.5117°, date: 20 October 2013”, Online calculator, http://www.ga.gov.au/oracle/geomag/agrfform.jsp, accessed 23 January 2017.
[12] B. Gibbes, A. Grinham, S. Albert, P. Fisher, M. J. Baum, and D. Gale, “Measurement of receiving environment conditions at a salt water reverse osmosis seafloor brine diffuser: experimental observations from the Gold Coast Desalination Plant,” Queensland, Australia: The University of Queensland, 2016.
[13] T. J. McDougall and P. M. Barker, “Getting started with TEOS-10 and the Gibbs seawater (GSW) oceanographic toolbox,” SCOR/IAPSO WG127, pp. 28, 2011.
[14] R. G. Dean, R. A. Dalrymple, Water wave mechanics for engineers and scientists, Advanced Series on Ocean Engineering, vol. 2, Singapore: World Scientific, 1991, pp. 78 – 86.
[15] O. Abessi, and P. J. W. Roberts, “Dense jet discharges in shallow water,” Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, vol. 142, pp. 04015033, 2015.
[16] P. J. W. Roberts, and O. Abessi, “Optimization of desalination diffusers using three-dimensional laser-induced fluorescence,” Report Prepared for United States Bureau of Reclamation Agreement Number R11 AC81 535, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 2014.