Developing Measurement Model of Interpersonal Skills of Youth
Authors: Mohd Yusri Ibrahim
Although it is known that interpersonal skills are essential for personal development, the debate however continues as to how to measure those skills, especially in youths. This study was conducted to develop a measurement model of interpersonal skills by suggesting three construct namely personal, skills and relationship; six function namely self, perception, listening, conversation, emotion and conflict management; and 30 behaviours as indicators. This cross-sectional survey by questionnaires was applied in east side of peninsula of Malaysia for 150 respondents, and analyzed by structural equation modelling (SEM) by AMOS. The suggested constructs, functions and indicators were consider accepted as measurement elements by observing on regression weight for standard loading, average variance extracted (AVE) for convergent validity, square root of AVE for discriminant validity, composite reliability (CR), and at least three fit indexes for model fitness. Finally, a measurement model of interpersonal skill for youth was successfully developed.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1130407Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1075
 B. H Spitzberg and W. R. Cupach, “Interpersonal skills,” In The Sage Handbook of Interpersonal Communication, 4th ed., M. L. Knapp and J.A. Daly, Eds. California: Sage, 2011, pp. 481–524.
 T. Saaranen, A. Vaajoki, M. Kellomäki and M. Hyvärinen, “The simulation method in learning interpersonal communication competence—Experiences of masters' degree students of health sciences,” Nurse Education Today, 35, pp. e8–e13, 2005.
 K. Floyd. Interpersonal Communication. Boston: McGraw-Hill, 2012.
 S. T. Leatherdale and A. Harvey, “Examining communication - and media-based recreational sedentary behaviors among Canadian youth: Results from the COMPASS study,” Preventive Medicine, 74, pp. 74–80, 2015.
 S. T. Leatherdale and V. Rynard, “A cross-sectional examination of modifiable risk factors for chronic disease among a nationally representative sample of youth: are Canadian students graduating high school with a failing grade for health?” BMC Public Health 13, pp. 569, 2013.
 S. T. Leatherdale and R. Ahmed, “Screen-based sedentary behaviours among a nationally representative sample of youth: are Canadian kids couch potatoes?” Chronic Dis. Inj. Can, 31, pp. 141–146, 2011.
 J. W Pfeiffer & J. E. Jones. Annual Handbook for Group Facilitator. (Eds.). San Diego CA: University Associates, 1973.
 G. Creasey, K. Ottlinger, K. D. Vico, T. Murray, A. Harvey and M. Hesson-McInnis, “Children's affective responses, cognitive appraisals, and coping strategies in response to the negative affect of parents and peers,” Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 67, pp. 39–56, 1997.
 E. L. Deci and R. M. Ryan, “Motivation, personality, and development within embedded social contexts: An overview of self-determination theory,” In The Oxford handbook of human motivation, R. M. Ryan (Ed.), New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2012, pp. 85–110.
 C. Fernet, M. Gagné and S. Austin, “When does quality of relationships with co-workers predict burnout over time? The moderating role of work motivation,” Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, pp. 1163–1180, 2010.
 J. Collie, A. Martin, B. Papworth and P. Ginns, “Students' interpersonal relationships, personal best (PB) goals, and academic engagement,” Learning and Individual Differences, 45, pp. 65–76, 2016.
 S. S. Beebe, S. J. Beebe and M.V. Redmond. Interpersonal Communication: Relating to Others (Ed). Boston: Pearson, 2008.
 F. Hair, M. Sarstedt, M. Ringle and A. Mena, “An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research,” Journal of the academy of marketing science, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 413-433, 2012.
 L. S. Meyers, G Gamst and A. J. Guarino. Aplied multivariate research: Design and interpretation. Sage Publication: London, 2006.