Learning Outcomes Alignment across Engineering Core Courses
Authors: A. Bouabid, B. Bielenberg, S. Ainane, N. Pasha
Abstract:
In this paper, a team of faculty members of the Petroleum Institute in Abu Dhabi, UAE representing six different courses across General Engineering (ENGR), Communication (COMM), and Design (STPS) worked together to establish a clear developmental progression of learning outcomes and performance indicators for targeted knowledge, areas of competency, and skills for the first three semesters of the Bachelor of Sciences in Engineering curriculum. The sequences of courses studied in this project were ENGR/COMM, COMM/STPS, and ENGR/STPS. For each course’s nine areas of knowledge, competency, and skills, the research team reviewed the existing learning outcomes and related performance indicators with a focus on identifying linkages across disciplines as well as within the courses of a discipline. The team reviewed existing performance indicators for developmental progression from semester to semester for same discipline related courses (vertical alignment) and for different discipline courses within the same semester (horizontal alignment). The results of this work have led to recommendations for modifications of the initial indicators when incoherence was identified, and/or for new indicators based on best practices (identified through literature searches) when gaps were identified. It also led to recommendations for modifications of the level of emphasis within each course to ensure developmental progression. The exercise has led to a revised Sequence Performance Indicator Mapping for the knowledge, skills, and competencies across the six core courses.
Keywords: Curriculum alignment, horizontal and vertical progression, performance indicators, skill level.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1130387
Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 840References:
[1] UAE Yearbook (2008). United Arab Emirates Yearbook 2008. I. Al Abed, P. Vine, P. Hellyer & P. Vine, (Eds.), London: Trident Press Ltd.
[2] Nilson, L.B. (2010) Teaching at Its Best: A research-based resource for college instructors, 3rd Edition. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
[3] Svinicki, M. D. (2004) Learning and Motivation in the Postsecondary Classroom. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
[4] Brown, L.R. (2008) Plan B 3.0 – Mobilizing to save civilization. Norton, New York.
[5] Wieman, C., Perkins, K., & Gilbert, S. (2010). Transforming Science Education at Large Research Universities: A Case Study in Progress. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 42(2), 6-14.