Anaerobic Digestion of Coffee Wastewater from a Fast Inoculum Adaptation Stage: Replacement of Complex Substrate

Authors: D. Lepe-Cervantes, E. Leon-Becerril, J. Gomez-Romero, O. Garcia-Depraect, A. Lopez-Lopez

Abstract:

In this study, raw coffee wastewater (CWW) was used as a complex substrate for anaerobic digestion. The inoculum adaptation stage, microbial diversity analysis and biomethane potential (BMP) tests were performed. A fast inoculum adaptation stage was used by the replacement of vinasse to CWW in an anaerobic sequential batch reactor (AnSBR) operated at mesophilic conditions. Illumina MiSeq sequencing was used to analyze the microbial diversity. While, BMP tests using inoculum adapted to CWW were carried out at different inoculum to substrate (I/S) ratios (2:1, 3:1 and 4:1, on a VS basis). Results show that the adaptability percentage was increased gradually until it reaches the highest theoretical value in a short time of 10 d; with a methane yield of 359.10 NmL CH₄/g COD-removed; Methanobacterium beijingense was the most abundant microbial (75%) and the greatest specific methane production was achieved at I/S ratio 4:1, whereas the lowest was obtained at 2:1, with BMP values of 320 NmL CH₄/g VS and 151 NmL CH₄/g VS, respectively. In conclusion, gradual replacement of substrate was a feasible method to adapt the inoculum in a short time even using complex raw substrates, whereas in the BMP tests, the specific methane production was proportional to the initial amount of inoculum.

Keywords: Fast inoculum adaptation, coffee wastewater, biomethane potential test, anaerobic digestion.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1130145

References:

[1] Pineda, C., Reyes, C. and Oseguera, A. (2003) Beneficiado y calidad del café. Manual del beneficiado del café, Instituto Hondureño del Café (IHCAFE), 212- 241.
[2] Angelidaki, I., Alves, M., Bolzonella, D., Borzacconi, L., Campos, L., Guwy, A. and Van Lier, J. (2007) Anaerobic Biodegradation, Activity and Inhibition (ABAI) Task Group Meeting 9th to 10th October 2006, in Prague. Kgs. Lyngby: Institute of Environment & Resources, Technical University of Denmark.
[3] González, C., and García, P. A. (2009) Impact of substrate to inoculum ratio in anaerobic digestion of swine slurry. Biomass Bioenergy. 33(8), 1065-1069.
[4] Nizami, A.S., Korres, N.E. and Murphy, J. D. (2009) Review of the Integrated Process for the Production of Grass Biomethane, Environ Sci Technol. 43(22), 8496-8508.
[5] Singh, A., Smyth, B.M. and Murphy, J.D. (2010) A biofuel strategy for Ireland with an emphasis on production of biomethane and minimization of land-take. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 14, 277-288.
[6] Raposo, F., De la Rubia, M. A., Fernández, V., and Borja, R. (2012) Anaerobic digestion of solid organic substrates in batch mode: an overview relating to methane yields and experimental procedures. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 16(1), 861-877.
[7] Gonçalves, M., Costa, J., Marques, I., and Alves, M. (2011) Inoculum acclimation to oleate promotes the conversion of olive mill wastewater to methane. Energy. 36(4), 2138-2141.
[8] Neves, L., Oliveira, R., and Alves, M. M. (2004) Influence of inoculum activity on the bio-methanization of a kitchen waste under different waste/inoculum ratios. Process Biochem. 39(12), 2019-2024.
[9] APHA. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 20th ed. J. American Public Health Association/American Water Works Association/Water Environment Federation: Washington, DC, 1999.
[10] Valdez, I., Torres, G. J., Molina, C., and Ruiz, G. M. (2016) Characterization of a Lignocellulolytic Consortium and Methane Production from Untreated Wheat Straw: Dependence on Nitrogen and Phosphorous Content. Bioresour Technol. 11(2), 4237-4251.
[11] Van Lier, J. B., Mahmoud, N., and Zeeman, G. (2008) Anaerobic wastewater treatment. Biological Wastewater Treatment: Principle, Modelling and Design. IWA Publishing, London, 415-456.
[12] Kivaisi, A.K. and Rubindamayugi, M.S.T. (1996) The potential of agro-industrial residues for production of biogas and electricity in Tanzania. Renew Energ. 9(4), 917-921.
[13] Hernandez, M. A., Rodríguez, M. and Andres Y. (2014) Use of coffee mucilage as a new substrate for hydrogen production in anaerobic co-digestion with swine manure. Bioresour Technol. 168, 112-118.
[14] López, A., León, E., Rosales, M. E., and Villegas, E. (2015) Influence of alkalinity and VFAs on the performance of an UASB reactor with recirculation for the treatment of Tequila vinasses. Environ Technol. 36(19), 2468-2476.
[15] Novita E. (2016) Biodegradability simulation of coffee wastewater using instant coffee. Agric Sci Procedia. 9, 217-229.
[16] Thauer, R. K., Kaster, A.K., Seedorf, H., Buckel, W. and Hedderich, R. (2008) Methanogenic archaea: ecologically relevant differences in energy conservation. Nat Rev Microbiol. 6, 579-591.
[17] Ma, K. (2005) Methanobacterium beijingense sp. nov., a novel methanogen isolated from anaerobic digesters. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 55(1), 325-329.
[18] Wilkins, D., Rao, S., Lu, X., and Lee, P. K. (2015) Effects of sludge inoculum and organic feedstock on active microbial communities and methane yield during anaerobic digestion. Front. Microbiol. Frontiers in Microbiology. 6, 1-11.
[19] Whatson, H. M. (2009) A comparison of the effects of two methods of acclimation on aerobic biodegradability. Environ Toxicol Chem. 12(11), 2023-2030.
[20] Houbron, E., Larrinaga, A, and Rustrian, E. (2003) Liquefaction and methanization of solid and liquid coffee wastes by two phase anaerobic digestion process. Water Sci Technol. 48(6), 255-62.