The Quality of Working Life and the Organizational Commitment of Municipal Employee in Samut Sakhon Province

Authors: Mananya Meenakorn

Abstract:

This research aims to investigate: (1) Relationship between the quality of working life and organizational commitment of municipal employee in Samut Sakhon Province. (2) To compare the quality of working life and the organizational commitment of municipal employee in Samut Sakhon Province by the gender, age, education, official experience, position, division, and income. This study is a quantitative research; data was collected by questionnaires distributed to the municipal employee in Samut Sakhon province for 241 sample by stratified random sampling. Data was analyzed by descriptive statistic including percentage, mean, standard deviation and inferential statistic including t-test, F-test and Pearson correlation for hypothesis testing. Finding showed that the quality of working life and the organizational commitment of municipal Employee in Samut Sakhon province in terms of compensation and fair has a positive correlation (r = 0.673) and the comparison of the quality of working life and organizational commitment of municipal employees in Samut Sakhon province by gender. We found that the overall difference was statistically significant at the 0.05 level and we also found stability and progress in career path and the characteristics are beneficial to society has a difference was statistically significant at the 0.01 level, and the participation and social acceptance has a difference was statistically significant at the 0.05 level.

Keywords: Quality of working life, organizational commitment, municipal employee, Samut Sakhon province.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1129990

References:

[1] Angle, H.I., & Perry, J.I. (1981). An Empirical assessment of organization commitment Organizational effectiveness. In Administrative Science Quarterly, 26 (1) 1-4.
[2] Buchanan, B. (1974A). Building Organization : The Socialization of manager in work organization. In Administrative Science Quarterly. 19(14), 533-546. (1974B). Govermment managers. Business executives and organization commitment. Administrative Review. (July,1974). 339-347.
[3] Baron, R.A. (1986). Behavior in Organization. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
[4] Fukami, C.V.& Larson, E.W. (1984). Commitment to company and union. Joumal of applied Psychology. 69 (August 1984). 367 -371.
[5] Porter, L.W. (1974, December). “Organizational commitment, Job Satisfaction, and Turnover Among Psychiatic Technicians,” Journal of Applied Psychology. 59(23): 603.
[6] Hackman, R.J., & Suttle, L. J. (1977). Improving life at work: Behavioral science Approach to organizational change. Santa Monica, California: Goodyear.
[7] Arsh R., & Mannari H. (1977). Organizational commitment and turnover: A Prediction Study. In Admlnistrative Science Quarterly. 22 (March 1977).
[8] Steers, R.M. (1977a). Organization Effectiveness: A Behavioral View. Santa Monica, Callformia: Goodyear Publishing Company, Inc.
[9] Shrovan, L., & Danul, J. (1982). Quality of work life perspective for business. New York: Addison Wesley.
[10] Steers, R.M. (1997). Organizational Effectiveness: A Behavioral view. Santa Monica califomai: Goodyear.
[11] Walton, R.E. (1975). The Quality of work life, New York: Free Press.