Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 30135
A Propose of Personnel Assessment Method Including a Two-Way Assessment for Evaluating Evaluators and Employees

Authors: Shunsuke Saito, Kazuho Yoshimoto, Shunichi Ohmori, Sirawadee Arunyanart

Abstract:

In this paper, we suggest a mechanism of assessment that rater and Ratee (or employees) to convince. There are many problems exist in the personnel assessment. In particular, we were focusing on the three. (1) Raters are not sufficiently recognized assessment point. (2) Ratee are not convinced by the mechanism of assessment. (3) Raters (or Evaluators) and ratees have empathy. We suggest 1: Setting of "understanding of the assessment points." 2: Setting of "relative assessment ability." 3: Proposal of two-way assessment mechanism to solve these problems. As a prerequisite, it is assumed that there are multiple raters. This is because has been a growing importance of multi-faceted assessment. In this model, it determines the weight of each assessment point evaluators by the degree of understanding and assessment ability of raters and ratee. We used the ANP (Analytic Network Process) is a theory that an extension of the decision-making technique AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process). ANP can be to address the problem of forming a network and assessment of Two-Way is possible. We apply this technique personnel assessment, the weights of rater of each point can be reasonably determined. We suggest absolute assessment for Two-Way assessment by ANP. We have verified that the consent of the two approaches is higher than conventional mechanism. Also, human resources consultant we got a comment about the application of the practice.

Keywords: Personnel assessment, ANP (analytic network process), two-way.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1129986

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 360

References:


[1] Sannno University, Personnel Evaluation Practice Project,“Personnel Evaluation Practice for the Manager,” 2009.
[2] Human Resource Management Glossa, April 10, 2015, https://kotobank.jp/word/360%E5%BA%A6%E8%A9% 95%E4%BE%A1-1125551, May 10, 2015.
[3] The Nihon Keizai Shimbun publishing company, NTT com research, “Awareness about the personnel evaluation” May 10, 2015, http://research.nttcoms.com/database/data/001961/, June 10, 2015.
[4] Kenji Kanedu, The Nikkei publishing company, ”Actual personnel evaluation,” 2005.
[5] T. L. Saaty, Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback; “The Analytic Network Process, RWS Publications,” Pittsburgh, 1996.
[6] T.L.Saaty,”The Analytic Hierarchy Process,” McGraw-Hill1980.
[7] Naokazu Yamaki and Kazuyuki Sekitani, Shizuoka University, “A Large-Scale AHP Including Incomplete Information and Multiple evaluators and Its Application to Personnel Administration Evaluation System,” Operations,Research 42(4),405-421, December 1999. http://ir.lib.shizuoka.ac.jp/bitstream/10297/3688/1/090701004.pdf, March 21, 2015.
[8] Naoithi Hathimaki and Shuntarou Shimada, “Apply the group AHP in Personnel Evaluation Operations Research”, 42, 1997, pp367-370, http://www.orsj.or.jp/~archive/pdf/bul/Vol.42_05_367.pdf, March 2, 2015.