Robot Navigation and Localization Based on the Rat’s Brain Signals

Authors: Endri Rama, Genci Capi, Shigenori Kawahara

Abstract:

The mobile robot ability to navigate autonomously in its environment is very important. Even though the advances in technology, robot self-localization and goal directed navigation in complex environments are still challenging tasks. In this article, we propose a novel method for robot navigation based on rat’s brain signals (Local Field Potentials). It has been well known that rats accurately and rapidly navigate in a complex space by localizing themselves in reference to the surrounding environmental cues. As the first step to incorporate the rat’s navigation strategy into the robot control, we analyzed the rats’ strategies while it navigates in a multiple Y-maze, and recorded Local Field Potentials (LFPs) simultaneously from three brain regions. Next, we processed the LFPs, and the extracted features were used as an input in the artificial neural network to predict the rat’s next location, especially in the decision-making moment, in Y-junctions. We developed an algorithm by which the robot learned to imitate the rat’s decision-making by mapping the rat’s brain signals into its own actions. Finally, the robot learned to integrate the internal states as well as external sensors in order to localize and navigate in the complex environment.

Keywords: Brain machine interface, decision-making, local field potentials, mobile robot, navigation, neural network, rat, signal processing.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1129676

References:

[1] B. Hofmann-Wellenhof, K. Legat, M. Wieser, Navigation: Principles of Positioning and Guidance, Springer-Verlag Wien, 2003, pp. 5–6.
[2] H. Yussof, “Robot Localization and Map Building”, Publisher: InTech, March 2010, Edited Volume, Ch. 7, pp. 133-151.
[3] G. Capi, M. Kitani, K. Ueki, “Guide robot intelligent navigation in urban environments,” in Advanced Robotics, Volume 28, Issue 15, pp. 1043-1053, 2014.
[4] G. Capi, “A Vision based Approach for Intelligent Robot Navigation,” in International Journal of Intelligent Systems Technologies and Applications (IJISTA), Vol. 9, No. 2, July 2010.
[5] B. Hua, E. Rama and G. Capi, “A human-like robot intelligent navigation in dynamic indoor environments,” presented at the 2nd IEEJ International Workshop on Sensing, Actuation, Motion Control, and Optimization (SAMCON2016), March 7-8, 2016, Tokyo, Japan.
[6] T. Oshima, M. Li, E. Rama and G. Capi, “Intelligent robot navigation for surveillance behavior - a remote based approach,” presented at the 2nd IEEJ International Workshop on Sensing, Actuation, Motion Control, and Optimization (SAMCON2016), March 7-8, 2016, Tokyo, Japan.
[7] M. Mano, G. Capi, “An adaptive BMI based method for real time wheelchair navigation,” in International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information and Control (IJICIC), Vol. 9, No. 12, pp. 4963-4972, 2013.
[8] G. Capi, “Real robots controlled by brain signals—A BMI approach,” in International Journal of Advance Intelligence, Vol.2, pp. 25–35, 2010.
[9] N. Birbaumer et al. (1999), “A spelling device for the paralyzed,” in Nature, Vol. 398, pp.297–298.
[10] F. Piccioneet et al. (2006), “P300-based brain computer interface: reliability and performance in healthy and paralyzed participants,” in Clinical Neurophysiology, Vol. 117, pp. 531–537.
[11] B. J. Lance, S. E. Kerick, A. J. Ries, K.S. Oie, K. McDowell, “Brain–Computer Interface Technologies in the Coming Decades” in Proceedings of the IEEE, vol.100, pp.1585-1599, May 2012.
[12] S. Halder, D. Agorastos, R. Veit, E.M. Hammer, S. Lee, B. Varkuti, M. Bogdan, W. Rosenstiel, N. Birbaumer, A. Kübler, “Neural mechanisms of brain–computer interface control,” in NeuroImage, Vol. 55, pp. 1779–1790, 2011.
[13] M. A. Lebedev and M. A.L. Nicolelis, “Brain–machine interfaces: past, present and future”, in TRENDS in Neurosciences, Vol.29 No.9, pp. 536-546, July 2006.
[14] C. R. Gallistel, “The organization of learning,” Cambridge: MA: Bradford/MIT Press, 1990.
[15] A. S. Etienne, R. Maurer, J. Berlie, B. Reverdin, T. Rowe, J. Georgakopoulos, V. Seguinot, “Navigation through vector addition,” in Nature, Vol. 396, pp. 161-164, 1998.
[16] A. S. Etienne, R. Maurer, V. Seguinot, “Path integration in mammals and its interactions with visual landmarks,” in Journal of Exp. Bio., Vol. 199, pp. 201-209, 1996.
[17] S. J. Shettleworth, “Cognition, evolution, and behavior,” New-York: Oxford University Press, 1998.
[18] E. Rama, G. Capi, S. Mizusaki, N. Tanaka, S. Kawahara, “Effects of Environment Changes on Rat`s Learned Behavior in an Elevated Y-Maze,” in Journal of Medical and Bioengineering, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 113-118, April 2016.
[19] E. Rama, G. Capi, N. Tanaka, S. Kawahara, “Rat`s Spatial Learning in an Novel Elevated Y-Maze,” presented at the 5th Annual International Conferences on CBP 2016, February 2016, Singapore.
[20] F. Mondada, M. Bonani, X. Raemy, J. Pugh, C. Cianci, A. Klaptocz, S. Magnenat, J. C. Zufferey, D. Floreano, A. Martinoli, “The e-puck, a Robot Designed for Education in Engineering,” in Proceedings of the 9th Conference on Autonomous Robot Systems and Competitions, Vol. 1(1), pp. 59-65, 2009.
[21] J. Hubert, Y. Weibel, “ePic2”, Documentation, November 2008.