Experimental Study of Geotextile Effect on Improving Soil Bearing Capacity in Aggregate Surfaced Roads

Authors: Mahdi Taghipour Masoumi, Ali Abdi Kordani, Mahmoud Nazirizad

Abstract:

Geosynthetics utilization plays an important role in the construction of highways with no additive layers, such as asphalt concrete or cement concrete, or in a subgrade layer which affects the bearing capacity of unbounded layers. This laboratory experimental study was carried out to evaluate changes in the load bearing capacity of reinforced soil with these materials in highway roadbed with regard to geotextile properties. California Bearing Ratio (CBR) test samples were prepared with two types of soil: Clayey and sandy containing non-reinforced and reinforced soil. The samples comprised three types of geotextiles with different characteristics (150, 200, 300 g/m²) and depths (H= 5, 10, 20, 30, 50, 100 mm), and were grouped into two forms, one-layered and two-layered, based on the sample materials in order to perform defined tests. The results showed that the soil bearing characteristics increased when one layer of geotextile was used in clayey and sandy samples reinforced by geotextile. However, the bearing capacity of the soil, in the presence of a geotextile layer material with depth of more than 30 mm, had no remarkable effect. Furthermore, when the two-layered geotextile was applied in material samples, although it increased the soil resistance, it also showed that through the addition of a number or weights of geotextile into samples, the natural composition of the soil changed and the results are unreliable.

Keywords: Reinforced soil, geosynthetics, geotextile, transportation capacity, CBR experiments.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1129586

References:

[1] Salih K. Shabana, Anshi C., Parambath Shamseera, T. M Shyamili, V. Sruthi, 2014, “Study on CBR Values of Soil with Crushed Coconut Shells, International Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology, Vol. 5(3), 55-58.
[2] Subaida, E.A., Chandrakaran, S., Sankar, N. 2009. Laboratory Performance of Unpaved Roads Reinforced with Woven Coir Geotextiles. Geotextiles and Geomembranesvol.27, 204–210.
[3] Deb, K., Konai, S., 2014.Bearing Capacity of Geotextile-Reinforced Sand with Varying Fine Fraction. Geomechanics and Engineering.Vol. 6, No. 1.33-45.
[4] Elshakankery, M.H., Almetwally, A.A., Tawfik, K.A. 2013. Experimental Study of Bearing Capacity for Egyptian Soils Reinforced by Geotextiles. Journal of Applied Sciences Research. 9(3), 2378-2385.
[5] Chauhan, M.S., Mittal, S., Mohanty, B., 2008. Performance Evaluation of Silty Sand Subgrade Reinforced with Fly Ash and Fibre. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 26(5), 429–435.
[6] Lekha, K.R., Kavitha, V., 2006. Coir Geotextile Reinforced Clay Dykes for Drainage of low-lying areas. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 24 (1), 38–51.
[7] Datye, K.R., Gore, V.N., 1994. Application of Natural Geotextiles and Related Products. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 13 (6/7), 371–388
[8] Ghosh, A., Bera, A.K., 2005. Bearing Capacity of Square Footing on Pond Ash Reinforced with Jute-Geotextile. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 23 (2), 144–173.
[9] Mandal, J.N., 1987.Geotextiles in India. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 6 (4), 253–274.
[10] Ranganathan, S.R., 1994. Development and Potential of Jute Geotextiles. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 13 (6/7), 421–433.
[11] Sanyal, T., Chakraborty, K., 1994. Application of a Bitumen-Coated Jute Geotextile in Bank-Protection Works in the Hooghly Estuary. Geotextiles and Geomembranes13 (2), 67–132.
[12] Rao, G.V., Balan, K. (Eds.), 2000. Coir Geotextiles – Emerging Trends. The Kerala State Coir Corporation Ltd (Publishers), Alappuzha, Kerala.
[13] Koerner RM. Designing with geosynthetics. New Jersey: Prentice- Hall, Inc.; 1998.
[14] Robnett QL, Lai JS. 1980. Fabric-Reinforced Aggregate Roads Overview. Transportation Research Records;875:42–50.
[15] Phillips, K.J., Ghosh, T.K., 2003. The technology of polypropylene tape yarns: processing and applications. In: Harrison, (Ed.), Textile Progress, vol. 33(1), 38–46.
[16] Noorzad, R., Mirmoradi, S.H., 2010. Laboratory Evaluation of the Behavior of a Geotextile Reinforced Clay. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 28, 386-392.
[17] Lafleur, J., Sall, M., Ducharme, A., 1987. Frictional Characteristics of Geotextiles with Compacted Lateritic Gravels and Clays. Proceedings of Geosynthetics 87 (1), 205–215.
[18] Unnikrishnan, N., Rajagopal, K., Krishnaswamy, N.R., 2002. Behavior of reinforced clay under monotonic and cyclic loading. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 20, 117–133.
[19] Basu, G., Roy, A.N., Bhattacharyya, S.K., Ghosh, S.K., 2009. Construction of Unpaved Rural Road Using Jute–Synthetic Blended Woven Geotextile – A case study. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 26, 506-512.
[20] Aiban SA, Al-Amoudi OSB, Ahmad I, Al-Abdul Wahhab HI., 1998. Reinforcement of a Saudi sabkha soil using geotextiles. Proceedings of the sixth international conference on geosynthetics, vol. 2, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, March, pp. 805–10.
[21] Ramaswamy SD, Aziz MA. Jute Fabric in Road Construction. Proceedings of the second international conference on geotextile, Las Vegas, USA, 1982. p. 359–62.
[22] Resl, S., Werner, G., (1986) The Influence of Nonwoven Needle- Punched Geotextiles on the Ultimate Bearing Capacity of the Subgrade, Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Geotextiles, Vienna, Vol. 4, pp. 1009– 1013.
[23] Naeini, S. A., Mirzakhanlari, M., 2008.The Effect of Geotextile and Grading on the Bearing Ratio of Granular Soils, EJGE, Vol 13.
[24] Minu, Michael, Vinod, P., 2009 “California bearing ratio of coir geotextile reinforced subgrade” 10th National conference on technological trends (NCTT 09), 63-67.
[25] Bergado, D. T., Youwai, S., Hai, C. N. and Vootipruex, P. (2001), “Interaction of Nonwoven Needle-Punched Geotextiles under Axisymmetric Loading Conditions”, Geotextile and Geomembranes 19, 299-328.