Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32579
Behavioral Experiments of Small Societies in Social Media: Facebook Expressions of Anchored Relationships

Authors: Nuran Öze


Communities and societies have been changing towards computer mediated communication. This paper explores online and offline identities and how relationships are formed and negotiated within internet environments which offer opportunities for people who know each other offline and move into relationships online. The expectations and norms of behavior within everyday life cause people to be embodied self. According to the age categories of Turkish Cypriots, their measurements of attitudes in Facebook will be investigated. Face-to-face field research and semi-structured interview methods are used in the study. Face-to-face interview has been done with Turkish Cypriots who are using Facebook already. According to the study, in constructing a linkage between real and virtual identities mostly affected from societal relations serves as a societal grooming tool for Turkish Cypriots.

Keywords: Facebook, identity, social media, virtual reality.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI):

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1024


[1] P. M. Broomberg, “Speak that I may see you”: Some reflections on dissociation, reality and psychoanalytic listening.” Psychoanalytic Dialogues, vol. 4 (4), pp. 517-547. 1994. Retrieved from (accessed 17 June 2016).
[2] N. Öze, “Cultural reflections of Internet, social media and new media usage in everyday life: The case of Northern Cyprus” in Digital Media & Electronic Communic Communication, Ed. F Lienard and S Zlitni, 1-3 Jun. 2016, pp. 957-967 (4th International Conference: Digital Media and Electronic Communication, Le Havre, France) (accessed 1 July 2016).
[3] B. A. Olaniran, N. Rodriguez, & I.M. Willams, “Social information processing theory (SIPT): A cultural perspective for international online communication environments”, in Computer-Mediated Communication Across Cultures: International Interactions on Online Environment, S. Kelsey, and K. St. Amant, Ed. IGI Global, 2011: pp. 45-65.
[4] C. Ross, E. S. Orr, M. Sisic, J. M. Arseneault, M. G. Simmering and R. R. Orr, “Personality and motivations associated with Facebook use,” Computer in Human Behaviour 25, pp. 578-586, 2009. doi: 10.16/j.chb.2008.12.024.
[5] J. Y. Kim, “Social interaction in computer-mediated communication,” Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science 26 (3), pp. 15–17, 2000. Retrieved from (accessed 16 July 2016) doi: 10.1002/bult.153.
[6] T. E.Higgins, G. Echterhoff, R. Crespillo and R.Kopietz, “Effects of communication on social knowledge: Sharing reality with individual versus group audiences”, Japanese Psychological Research, 49 (2), pp. 89-99, 2007. Retrieved from (accessed 8 July 2016) doi: 10.1111./j.1468-5884.2007.00336.x.
[7] M. Castells Communication Power. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.
[8] F. Colombo, “What we talk about when we talk about social media” 2015 (in International Workshop, Barcelona, Spain), doi: 10.13140/RG.2.1.4598.576.
[9] R. Silverstone, “Domesticating Domestication. Reflections on the Life of a Concept” in Domestication of Media and Technology, T. Berker, et al., Ed. Berkshire: Open University Press, 2006: pp. 229-248.
[10] S. Turkle, Life on the screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1997.
[11] F. Stutzman, J. E. Vitak, B. Nicole, R. Gray, and C. Lampe, “Privacy in interaction: Exploring disclosure and social capital in Facebook”, 4-7 June 2012, pp. 330-337. California: AAAI Press (Sixth international AAAI conference on weblogs and social media, Dublin, Ireland, Spain). Retrieved from (accessed on 2 August 2016).
[12] J. R. Suler, “Identity management in cyberspace,” Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies 4 (4), pp. 455-459, 2002. Retrieved from (accessed on 22 September 2016).
[13] S. Turkle Cyberspace and identity. Contemporary Sociology, American Sociological Association, 28 (6), pp.643-648, 1999, Retrieved from (accessed on 2 August 2016).
[14] P. J. Burke and J. E. Steets, Identity Theory. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.
[15] J. Rummens, Personal identity and social structure in Sint Maartin/Saint Martin: a plural identities approach. Unpublished Thesis/Dissertation: York University, 1993.
[16] H. Tajfel And J. C. Turner, “An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict”, in The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, W. G. Austin and S. Worchel Ed., Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole, pp. 33-47, 1979.
[17] S. A. McLeod, Social Identity Theory, 2008. Retrieved from (accessed on 22 September 2016).
[18] P. J. Burke and J. E. Steets “Identity theory and social identity theory”, (in Social psychology section session on theoretical frameworks at the annual meetings of the American Sociological Association, San Francisco, USA, 1998). Retrieved from (accessed on 22 September 2016).
[19] S. D. Reicher, R. Spears and T. Postmes, “A social identity model of deindivudiation phenomena”, European Review of Social Psychology, 6, 1995: pp. 161- 198. doi: 10.1080/14792779443000049.
[20] J. B. Walther, “Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective,” Communication Research, 19 (1), 1992: pp. 52–90. doi:10.1177/009365092019001003.
[21] B. A. Olaniran, “Social information processing theory (SIPT): A cultural perspective for international online communication environments,” IGI Global. Epub ahead of print 25 November 2011: pp. 45-46. Retrieved from (accessed on 22 September 2016) DOI: 10.4018/978-1-60960-833-0.ch004.
[22] J. B., Walther, “Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction,” Communication Research 23, 1996: pp 3-43.
[23] J. Pena, J. B. Walther and J. T. Hancock, “Effects of geographic distribution on dominance perceptions in computer-mediated group,” Communication Research, 34, 2007: pp. 313–331. doi: 10.1177/0093650207300431.
[24] K., Greene, V. J. Derlega and A. Mathews, “Self-disclosure in personal relationships”, The Cambridge Handbook of Personal Relationships, in A. L. Vangelisti and D. Perlman Ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006: pp. 409-42.. Epub ahead of print June 2012. Chapter doi: (accessed on 30 June 2016).
[25] V. L. Derlega and A. L. Chaikin, “Privacy and self-disclosure in social relationships”. Journal of Social Issues 33, 1977, pp. 102-115.
[26] L. C. Tidwell and J. B. Walther, “Computer-mediated communication effects on disclosure, impressions, and interpersonal evaluations: Getting to know one another at a time,” Human Communication Research 28 (3), 2002): pp. 317-348.
[27] M. Castells, “Materials for an exploratory theory of the network society”. British Journal of Sociology 51 (1), January/March 2000; pp. 5–24. Retrieved from: (accessed on 17 July 2016).
[28] K. Y. A. McKenna, A. S., Green and M. E. J. Gleason, “Relationship formation on the Internet: What’s the big attraction?,” Journal of Social Issues 58 (1), 2002: pp. 9-31. Retrieved from: (accessed on 30 September 2016).
[29] T. A. Pempek, Y. A. Yermoleyeva and S. L. Calvert, “College students’ social networking experiences on Facebook,” Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 30, 2009: pp. 227-238. doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2008.12.010.
[30] N. B. Ellison, C. Steinfield and C. Lampe, “The benefits of Facebook “Friends:” Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites,” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 2007, pp. 1143-1168. Retrieved from: (accessed on 12 July 2016).
[31] B. Wellman, A. Quan-Haase, J. Boase and W. Chen, “Examining the Internet in everyday life,” (The euricom conference on e-democracy, Nijmegen, Netherlands. 9-12 October 2002). Retrieved from (accessed on 22 August 2016).
[32] S. Zhao, “Cyber-gathering places and online-embedded relationships,” (Annual meetings of the eastern sociological society, Boston, USA, February 2006).
[33] S. Zhao, S. Grasmuck and J. Martin, “Identity construction on Facebook: Digital empowerment in anchored relationships,” Computers in Human Behaviour 24, 2008: pp. 1816-1836. Retrieved from (accessed on 22 September 2016).
[34] M. Hardey, “Life beyond the screen: Embodiment and identity through the internet,” (The Editorial Board of The Sociological Review, 2002). Retrieved from (accessed on 12 July 2016).
[35] D. Boyd, It’s complicated. USA: Yale University, 2014. Retrieved from (accessed on 22 June 2016).
[36] J. Bargh, K. Y. A. Mckenna and G. M. Fitzimons, “Can you see the real me? Activation and expression of the “true self” on the Internet,” Journal of Social Issues 58 (1), 2002; pp. 33-48. Retrieved from (accessed on 19 July 2016).
[37] M. Bakardjieva, “Virtual togetherness: an everyday-life perspective,” Media, Culture & Society 25, 2003: pp. 291–313. Retrieved from (acceessed on 22 September 2016).
[38] N. J.Hum, P. E. Chamberlin, B. L. Hambright, A. C. Portvood, A. C. Schat and , J. L. Bevan, “A picture is worth a thousand words: A content analysis of Facebook profile photographs,” Computers in Human Behaviour 27, 2011: pp.. 1828-1833. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2011.04.003 Retrieved from (accessed on 12 September 2016).
[39] J. Miles and P. Gilbert A Handbook of research methods for clinical and health psychology. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.