Elaboration and Validation of a Survey about Research on the Characteristics of Mentoring of University Professors’ Lifelong Learning
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32870
Elaboration and Validation of a Survey about Research on the Characteristics of Mentoring of University Professors’ Lifelong Learning

Authors: Nagore Guerra Bilbao, Clemente Lobato Fraile


This paper outlines the design and development of the MENDEPRO questionnaire, designed to analyze mentoring performance within a professional development process carried out with professors at the University of the Basque Country, Spain. The study took into account the international research carried out over the past two decades into teachers' professional development, and was also based on a thorough review of the most common instruments used to identify and analyze mentoring styles, many of which fail to provide sufficient psychometric guarantees. The present study aimed to gather empirical data in order to verify the metric quality of the questionnaire developed. To this end, the process followed to validate the theoretical construct was as follows: The formulation of the items and indicators in accordance with the study variables; the analysis of the validity and reliability of the initial questionnaire; the review of the second version of the questionnaire and the definitive measurement instrument. Content was validated through the formal agreement and consensus of 12 university professor training experts. A reduced sample of professors who had participated in a lifelong learning program was then selected for a trial evaluation of the instrument developed. After the trial, 18 items were removed from the initial questionnaire. The final version of the instrument, comprising 33 items, was then administered to a sample group of 99 participants. The results revealed a five-dimensional structure matching theoretical expectations. Also, the reliability data for both the instrument as a whole (.98) and its various dimensions (between .91 and .97) were very high. The questionnaire was thus found to have satisfactory psychometric properties and can therefore be considered apt for studying the performance of mentoring in both induction programs for young professors and lifelong learning programs for senior faculty members.

Keywords: Higher education, mentoring, professional development, university teachers.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1129567

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 814


[1] C.A. Mullen, (Eds.), The handbook of formal mentoring in higher education: A case approach. Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon Publishers, 2008
[2] A. Brockbank and I. McGill, Facilitating Reflective Learning in Higher Education. Maidenhead: Open University Press, 2007.
[3] M. Frenay, A. Saroyan, K.L. Taylor, D. Bédart, M. Clement, N. Rege Colet, J.J. Paul and A. Kolmos, “Accompagner le développement pédagogique des enseignants universitaires à l’aide d’un cadre conceptuel original,” Revue française de pédagogie, no.172, pp. 63-76, 2010.
[4] L. Orland-Barak, “Lost in translation (perdidos en la traducción): tutores o mentores que aprenden a participar en discursos competitivos de la práctica educativa,” Revista de Educación, no, 340, pp.187-212, 2006.
[5] L.C. Ehrich, “Mentoring and women managers: another look at the field. Gender in Management,” An International Journal, vol. 23, no.7, pp. 469-483, 2008.
[6] C. Vélaz de Medrano Ureta, “Competencias del profesor-mentor para el acompañamiento del profesor principiante,” Profesorado: Revista de currículum y formación del Profesorado, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 225-238, 2009.
[7] S. Feiman-Nemser, “Helping novices learn to teach: Lessons from an exemplary support teacher,” Journal of Teacher Education, vol. 52, no. 1, pp.17-30, 2001.
[8] G.L. Huber, “Aprendizaje activo y metodologías educativas,” Revista de Educación, special no., pp.59-81, 2008.
[9] S. Fletcher and C.A. Mullen (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of mentoring and coaching in education. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 2012.
[10] P. Leslie, L. Lingard, and S. Whyte, “Junior Faculty Experiences with Informal Mentoring,” Medical Teacher, vol. 27, no.8, pp. 693 698, 2005.
[11] L. E: Thorndyke, M. E. Gusic and R. J. Milner, “ Functional mentoring: A practical Approach with Multilevel Outcomes,” Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 157-164, 2008.
[12] H. Bradbury, N. Frost, S. Kilminster and M. Zukas, Beyond reflective practice: new approaches to professional lifelong learning. London: Routledge, 2010.
[13] P. J. Norman and S. Feiman-Nemser, “ Mind activity in teaching and mentoring,” Teaching and Teacher Education, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 679-697, 2005.
[14] A. Clarke, J. Collins, V. Triggs and W. Nielsen, “The Mentoring profile Inventory: an online professional development resource for cooperating teachers,” Teaching Education, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 167-194, 2012.
[15] A. Yesilbuusa, A. Selmin Söylemez and A. Rakicioglu-Söylemez, “Turkish adaptation of the mentoring for EFL teaching survey,” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences , vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 894-900, 2013.