Commenced in January 2007
Paper Count: 30123
Dicotyledon Weed Quantification Algorithm for Selective Herbicide Application in Maize Crops: Statistical Evaluation of the Potential Herbicide Savings
Abstract:This work contributes a statistical model and simulation framework yielding the best estimate possible for the potential herbicide reduction when using the MoDiCoVi algorithm all the while requiring a efficacy comparable to conventional spraying. In June 2013 a maize field located in Denmark were seeded. The field was divided into parcels which was assigned to one of two main groups: 1) Control, consisting of subgroups of no spray and full dose spraty; 2) MoDiCoVi algorithm subdivided into five different leaf cover thresholds for spray activation. In addition approximately 25% of the parcels were seeded with additional weeds perpendicular to the maize rows. In total 299 parcels were randomly assigned with the 28 different treatment combinations. In the statistical analysis, bootstrapping was used for balancing the number of replicates. The achieved potential herbicide savings was found to be 70% to 95% depending on the initial weed coverage. However additional field trials covering more seasons and locations are needed to verify the generalisation of these results. There is a potential for further herbicide savings as the time interval between the first and second spraying session was not long enough for the weeds to turn yellow, instead they only stagnated in growth.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1129565Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 536
 Wallinga, Groeneveld, and Lotz, “Measures that describe weed spatial patterns at different levels of resolution and their applications for patch spraying of weeds,” Weed Res., vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 351–359, 1 Oct. 1998.
 S. L. Young and F. J. Pierce, Automation: The Future of Weed Control in Cropping Systems:. Springer Netherlands, 2014.
 T. W. Berge, S. Goldberg, K. Kaspersen, and J. Netland, “Towards machine vision based site-specific weed management in cereals,” Comput. Electron. Agric., vol. 81, no. 0, pp. 79–86, Feb. 2012.
 R. Gerhards and S. Christensen, “Real-time weed detection, decision making and patch spraying in maize, sugarbeet, winter wheat and winter barley,” Weed Res., vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 385–392, 1 Dec. 2003.
 S. Christensen, H. T. Søgaard, P. Kudsk, M. Nørremark, I. Lund, E. S. Nadimi, and R. Jørgensen, “Site-specific weed control technologies,” Weed Res., vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 233–241, 1 Jun. 2009.
 X. P. Burgos-Artizzu, A. Ribeiro, M. Guijarro, and G. Pajares, “Real-time image processing for crop/weed discrimination in maize fields,” Comput. Electron. Agric., vol. 75, no. 2, pp. 337–346, Feb. 2011.
 R. D. Lamm, D. C. Slaughter, and D. K. Giles, “Precision weed control system for cotton,” Trans. ASAE, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 231–238, 2002.
 D. C. Slaughter, “The biological engineer: Sensing the difference between crops and weeds,” in Automation: The Future of Weed Control in Cropping Systems. Springer Netherlands, 2014, pp. 71–95.
 R. Gerhards and H. Oebel, “Practical experiences with a system for site-specific weed control in arable crops using real-time image analysis and GPS-controlled patch spraying,” Weed Res., vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 185–193, 1 Jun. 2006.
 D. C. Slaughter, D. K. Giles, and D. Downey, “Autonomous robotic weed control systems: A review,” Comput. Electron. Agric., vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 63–78, Apr. 2008.
 R. N. Jørgensen, N. Krueger, H. S. Midtiby, and M. S. Laursen, “Spray boom for selectively spraying a herbicidal composition onto dicots,” Patent 20 140 001 276, 2 Jan., 2014.
 M. J. Kropff and C. J. T. Spitters, “A simple model of crop loss by weed competition from early observations on relative leaf area of the weeds,” Weed Res., vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 97–105, 1 Apr. 1991.
 C. J. T. Spitters and R. Aerts, “Simulation of competition for light and water in crop-weed associations,” Asp. Appl. Biol., vol. 4, pp. 467–483, 1983.
 M. S. Laursen, H. S. Midtiby, R. N. Jørgensen, and N. Kr¨uger, “Validation of MoDiCoVi - monocot and dicot coverage ratio vision based method for real time estimation of canopy coverage ration between cereal and dicotyledon weeds,” in International Conference on Precision Agriculture, Indianapolis, US, July 2012, 2012.
 A. Ali, J. C. Streibig, S. Christensen, and C. Andreasen, “Estimation of weeds leaf cover using image analysis and its relationship with fresh biomass yield of maize under field conditions,” in Proceedings 2011 International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies in Agriculture, Food and Environment. ceur-ws.org, 2011, pp. 41–49.
 M. S. Laursen, R. N. Jørgensen, H. S. Midtiby, K. Jensen, M. P. Christiansen, T. M. Giselsson, A. K. Mortensen, and P. K. Jensen, “Dicotyledon weed quantification algorithm for selective herbicide application in maize crops,” Sensors, vol. 16, no. 11, p. 1848, 2016.
 K. Kristensen, “The use of spatial and randomisation-based methods for analysis of trials with treatments randomised into rows and columns,” J. Stat. Plan. Inference, vol. 140, no. 6, pp. 1542–1549, Jun. 2010.
 B. M. Bolker, M. E. Brooks, C. J. Clark, S. W. Geange, J. R. Poulsen, M. H. H. Stevens, and J.-S. S. White, “Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution,” Trends Ecol. Evol., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 127–135, Mar. 2009.
 A. Onofri, E. A. Carbonell, H.-P. Piepho, A. M. Mortimer, and R. D. Cousens, “Current statistical issues in weed research,” Weed Res., vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 5–24, 1 Feb. 2010.
 B. Efron, “Bootstrap methods: Another look at the jackknife,” Ann. Stat., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–26, Jan. 1979.
 R Core Team, “R: A language and environment for statistical computing,” Vienna, Austria, 2012.
 D. M. Woebbecke, G. E. Meyer, K. V. Bargen, and D. A. Mortensen, “Color indices for weed identification under various soil, residue, and lighting conditions,” Trans. ASAE, vol. 38, no. l, pp. 259–269, 1995.
 B. Efron and R. J. Tibshirani, An Introduction to the Bootstrap, ser. Chapman & Hall/CRC Monographs on Statistics & Applied Probability. Taylor & Francis, 1994.
 R. J. Carroll and D. Ruppert, Transformation and weighting in regression. CRC Press, 1988, vol. 30.
 S. S. Seefeldt, J. E. Jensen, and E. P. Fuerst, “Log-Logistic analysis of herbicide Dose-Response relationships,” Weed Technol., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 218–227, 1 Apr. 1995.
 J. Ascard, “Dose–response models for flame weeding in relation to plant size and density,” Weed Res., vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 377–385, 1 Oct. 1994.
 M. Weisa and R. Gerhards, “Feature extraction for the identification of weed species in digital images for the purpose of site-specific weed control,” in Precision agriculture’07. Papers presented at the 6th European Conference on Precision Agriculture, Skiathos, Greece, 3-6 June, 2007., 2007, pp. 537–544.
 M. S. Laursen, R. N. Jørgensen, M. Dyrmann, and R. N. Poulsen, “RoboWeedSupport - sub millimeter weed image acquisition in cereal crops with speeds up till 50 km/h,” in European Conference on Precision Agriculture, Edinburgh, Scotland, July 2017, 2017.
 WeedIt, “WEEDit - plant detection technology,” http://www.weedit.com.au/, 2015, accessed: 2015-3-12.
 T. Komives and P. Reisinger, “Precision weed control in sunflower and maize - experiences from hungary,” in Proceedings, 25th German Conference on Weed Biology and Weed Control, Volume 1, Braunschweig, Germany, March 13-15, 2012., vol. 1. Julius K¨uhn Institut, Bundesforschungsinstitut f¨ur Kulturpflanzen, 2012, pp. 207–214.
 P. Lutman and P. Miller, “Spatially variable herbicide application technology; opportunities for herbicide minimisation and protection of beneficial weeds,” Tech. Rep., 2007.
 C. Tardif-Paradis, M.-J. Simard, G. D. Leroux, B. Panneton, R. E. Nurse, and A. Vanasse, “Effect of planter and tractor wheels on row and inter-row weed populations,” Crop Prot., vol. 71, no. 0, pp. 66–71, May 2015.