Evaluation of Top-down and Bottom-up Leadership Development Programs in a Finnish Company

Authors: Kati Skarp, Keijo Varis, Juha Kettunen

Abstract:

The purpose of this paper is to examine and evaluate the top-down and bottom-up leadership development programs focused on human capital that improve the performance of a company. This study reports on the external top-down leadership development program supported by a consulting company and the internal participatory action research of the bottom-up program. The sickness rate and the lost time incident failure rate decreased and the ideas produced for cost savings improved, leading to increased earnings during the top-down program. The estimated cost savings potential of the bottom-up program was 3.8 million euro based on the cost savings of meeting habits, maintenance practices and the way of working in production. The results of this study are useful for those who plan and evaluate leadership development and human capital productivity consultation programs to improve the performance of a company.

Keywords: Leadership, development, human resources, company, indicators, evaluation.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1129553

References:

[1] S. H. Appelbaum, M. C. Degbe, O. MacDonald, and T. Nguyen-Quan, “Organizational outcomes of leadership style and resistance to change (Part Two),” Ind Commer Train, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 135–144, 2015.
[2] N. Bontis, and J. Fitzenz, “Intellectual capital ROI: A causal map of human capital antecedents and consequences,” Journal of Intellectual Capital, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 223–247, 2002.
[3] J. McGregor, D. Tweed, and R. Pech, “Human capital in the new economy: Devil’s bargain?” Journal of Intellectual Capital, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 153–164, 2004.
[4] D. T. Holt, A. A. Armenakis, H. S. Field, and S. G. Harris, “Readiness for organizational change: The systematic development of a scale,” The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 232–255, June, 2007.
[5] E. H. Schein, Organizational Culture and Leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1997.
[6] M. Kesti, and A. Syväjärvi, “Human tacit signals at organization performance development,” Ind Manage Data Syst, vol. 110, no. 2, pp. 211–229, 2010.
[7] J. Gharajedaghi, Systems Thinking: Managing Chaos and Complexity: A Platform for Designing Business Architecture. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2011.
[8] B. de Wit, and R. Meyer (1998). Strategy: Process, Content, Context: An International Perspective. London: International Thomson Business Press.
[9] F. J. Barrett, “Social constructionist challenge to representational knowledge: Implications for understanding organization change,” in Dialogic Organization Development: The Theory and Practice of Transformational Change, G. R. Bushe, and R. J. Marshak, Eds. Oakland, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, pp. 59–76, 2015.
[10] J. Kettunen, “Innovation pedagogy for universities of applied sciences,” Creative Education, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 56–62, 2011.
[11] M. A. da Silva, G. Zangiski, E. P. de Lima, and S. E. G. da Costa, “Organizational competence building and development: Contributions to operations management,” Int J Prod Econ, vol. 144, pp. 76–89, 2013.
[12] R. Sanchez, “Understanding competence-based management: Identifying and managing five modes of competence,” J Bus Res, vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 518–532, May 2004
[13] B. M. Fraumeni, “Human capital productivity: A new concept for productivity analysis,” International Productivity Monitor, vol. 24, pp. 20–26, 2012.
[14] W. J. Rothwell, R. Sullivan, and G. N. McLean, Practicing Organization Development: A Guide for Consultants. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer, 1995.
[15] M. Kubr, Management Consulting: A Guide to the Profession. Geneva: International Labour Office, 2002.
[16] J. C. McDavid, I. Huse, and R. R. I. Hawthorn, Program Evaluation and Performance Evaluation: An Introduction to Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2013.
[17] W. W. Burke, Organization Change: Theory and Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2002.
[18] T. Malmi, P. Järvinen, and P. Lillrank, “A collaborative approach for managing project cost of poor quality,” Eur Account Rev, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 293–317, 2004.
[19] P. Järvinen, K. Artto, and P. Aalto, “Explorations on the integration of fractured process improvement: The 3A-workshop procedure,” Project Management, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 77–83, 2000.
[20] J. P. Kotter, Leading Change. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press, 2012.
[21] D. Coghlan, and T. Brannick, Doing Action Research in Your Own Organization. London: Sage Publications, 2014.
[22] S. Chen, B. Poland, and H. A. Skinner, “Youth voices: Evaluation of participatory action research,” Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 125–150, 2007.
[23] B. Williams, and R. Hummelbrunner, Systems Concepts in Action: A practitioner´s Toolkit. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2011.
[24] C. J. Dold, and R. A. Chapman, “Hearing a voice: Results of a participatory action research study,” Journal of Child and Family Studies, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 512–519, June 2012.
[25] I. Nonaka, and H. Takeuchi, The Knowledge Creating Company. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1995.
[26] H. Ali, W. Arif, D. S. Pirzada, A. A. Khan, and J. Hussain, “Classical model based analysis of cost of poor quality in a manufacturing organization,” Afr J Bus Manag, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 670–680, Jan. 2012.
[27] M. Beer, M. Finnström, and D. Schrader, “Why leadership training fails – and what do to about it,” Harvard Business Review, pp. 50–57, Oct. 2016.