Comparison of Traditional and Green Building Designs in Egypt: Energy Saving

Authors: Hala M. Abdel Mageed, Ahmed I. Omar, Shady H. E. Abdel Aleem

Abstract:

This paper describes in details a commercial green building that has been designed and constructed in Marsa Matrouh, Egypt. The balance between homebuilding and the sustainable environment has been taken into consideration in the design and construction of this building. The building consists of one floor with 3 m height and 2810 m² area while the envelope area is 1400 m². The building construction fulfills the natural ventilation requirements. The glass curtain walls are about 50% of the building and the windows area is 300 m². 6 mm greenish gray tinted temper glass as outer board lite, 6 mm safety glass as inner board lite and 16 mm thick dehydrated air spaces are used in the building. Visible light with 50% transmission, 0.26 solar factor, 0.67 shading coefficient and 1.3 W/m².K thermal insulation U-value are implemented to realize the performance requirements. Optimum electrical distribution for lighting system, air conditions and other electrical loads has been carried out. Power and quantity of each type of the lighting system lamps and the energy consumption of the lighting system are investigated. The design of the air conditions system is based on summer and winter outdoor conditions. Ventilated, air conditioned spaces and fresh air rates are determined. Variable Refrigerant Flow (VRF) is the air conditioning system used in this building. The VRF outdoor units are located on the roof of the building and connected to indoor units through refrigerant piping. Indoor units are distributed in all building zones through ducts and air outlets to ensure efficient air distribution. The green building energy consumption is evaluated monthly all over one year and compared with the consumed energy in the non-green conditions using the Hourly Analysis Program (HAP) model. The comparison results show that the total energy consumed per year in the green building is about 1,103,221 kWh while the non-green energy consumption is about 1,692,057 kWh. In other words, the green building total annual energy cost is reduced from 136,581 $ to 89,051 $. This means that, the energy saving and consequently the money-saving of this green construction is about 35%. In addition, 13 points are awarded by applying one of the most popular worldwide green energy certification programs (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design “LEED”) as a rating system for the green construction. It is concluded that this green building ensures sustainability, saves energy and offers an optimum energy performance with minimum cost.

Keywords: Energy consumption, energy saving, green building, leadership in energy and environmental design, sustainability.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1129530

References:

[1] Shady H.E. Abdel Aleem, Ahmed F. Zobaa, Hala M. Abdel Mageed, "Assessment of energy credits for the enhancement of the Egyptian Green Pyramid Rating System," Energy policy, 87, 2015, pp. 407-416.
[2] (IGBC), Indian Green Building Council. Abridged Reference Guide for New Construction & Major Renovations (LEED-India), India
[3] Md. Asif Uddin Khan, Rakiba Rayhana, Ratan Datta, “Development of An Energy Audit Tool for Commercial Buildings in Bangladesh,” BSc. Thesis in Electrical and Electronics Engineering, BRAC University, Aug. 2015
[4] M. DeKay & G.Z. Brown, Sun Wind & Light, Architectural Design Strategies, 3rd edition, Wiley, 2014
[5] Energy Performance of Building Directive (EPBD) compliance study, Written by ICF International, December 2015
[6] Energy Audit of Building: A Case Study of a Commercial Building in Shanghai. s.l. : U.S. Government work, 2011
[7] Elgendy, K., 2010. Comparing Estidama's Pearls Rating System to LEED and BREEAM. Carboun: Advocating Sustainable Cities in the Middle East. Available at: http://www.Carboun.com/sustainable-urbanism Accessed on 19/1/17
[8] Choongwan, K., Taehoon, H., Minhyun, L., Hyo, S.P., 2014. Development of a new energy efficiency rating system for existing residential buildings. Energy Policy 68, pp. 218–23, Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.12.068 Accessed on 23/1/2017
[9] Yudelson, J., Green Building through Integrated Design, first edition, McGraw-Hill, New York, 2008
[10] U.S. Green Building Council, 2012. Available at: http://www.usgbc.org Accessed on 18/01/17.
[11] Abdel Aleem, S.H.E., Balci, M.E., Sakar, S., "Effective utilization of cables and transformers using passive filters for non-linear loads". Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Sys., 2015, 71, pp.344–350.
[12] Diaa A. Madboly, S.H.E. Abdel Aleem, A.M. Ibrahim, “Optimal Sizing of Different Configurations of Renewable Distributed Generation Systems for a Green Building in Egypt”, 18th International Middle - East Power Systems Conference, MEPCON' 2016, December 27-29, 2016.
[13] Younan, V.A., "Developing a Green Building Rating System for Egypt," M.Sc. Dissertation. School of Sciences and Engineering, The American University in Cairo, Cairo, Egypt, 2011
[14] Standard 90.1-2001 (I-P Edition) -- Energy Standard for Buildings Except Low-Rise Residential Buildings (IESNA cosponsored; ANSI approved; Continuous Maintenance Standard)
[15] American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning, Standard 189.1P for the Design of High-Performance Green Buildings, ASHRAE® Standard. Atlanta, 2011
[16] Goetzler, “Variable Refrigerant Flow Systems,” ASHRAE Journal, April 2007, pp. 24-31
[17] Thornton, Brian, “Variable Refrigerant Flow Systems,” General Services Administration Report, US Federal Government, 2013