Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 30132
Material and Parameter Analysis of the PolyJet Process for Mold Making Using Design of Experiments

Authors: A. Kampker, K. Kreisköther, C. Reinders

Abstract:

Since additive manufacturing technologies constantly advance, the use of this technology in mold making seems reasonable. Many manufacturers of additive manufacturing machines, however, do not offer any suggestions on how to parameterize the machine to achieve optimal results for mold making. The purpose of this research is to determine the interdependencies of different materials and parameters within the PolyJet process by using design of experiments (DoE), to additively manufacture molds, e.g. for thermoforming and injection molding applications. Therefore, the general requirements of thermoforming molds, such as heat resistance, surface quality and hardness, have been identified. Then, different materials and parameters of the PolyJet process, such as the orientation of the printed part, the layer thickness, the printing mode (matte or glossy), the distance between printed parts and the scaling of parts, have been examined. The multifactorial analysis covers the following properties of the printed samples: Tensile strength, tensile modulus, bending strength, elongation at break, surface quality, heat deflection temperature and surface hardness. The key objective of this research is that by joining the results from the DoE with the requirements of the mold making, optimal and tailored molds can be additively manufactured with the PolyJet process. These additively manufactured molds can then be used in prototyping processes, in process testing and in small to medium batch production.

Keywords: Additive manufacturing, design of experiments, mold making, PolyJet.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1129522

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 935

References:


[1] G. Reinhart, Rapid manufacturing. Methoden für die reaktionsfähige Produktion. Augsburg, 1999, pp. 2-4.
[2] Chair of Production Engineering of E-Mobility Components (PEM), Einsatz generativer Verfahren im Werkzeugbau für das Thermoformen von Prototypen und Kleinserien. Aachen, 2016.
[3] Stratasys Ltd., Connex3 Systems. URL: http://www.stratasys.com/3d-printers/production-series/connex3-systems, Accessed on 20/02/2017.
[4] E. Napadensky, H. Gothait; Objet Geometries Ltd. Three dimensional printing method and model obtained. EP 1274551 B1. 2001
[5] A. Gebhardt, Understanding additive manufacturing. Munich, Carl Hanser Verlag, 2011, p. 46.
[6] P. Fastermann, 3D-Druck/Rapid Prototyping. Düsseldorf, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2012, pp. 114-128.
[7] R. C. Stauber, Chancen und Anforderungen an Kunststoffe und Kunststofftechnologien, Automobil der Zukunft, 2010, p. 21.
[8] N. P. Karapatis, J. van Griethuysen, R. Glardon, Direct rapid tooling. A re-view of current research. In: Rapid Prototyping Journal. 1998, p 81.
[9] Stratasys Ltd., PolyJet Materials: A Range of Possibilies, 2014.
[10] Stratasys Ltd., PolyJet Materials. URL: http://www.stratasys.com/materials/polyjet, 2016, Accessed on 20/02/2017.
[11] Stratasys Ltd., PolyJet Material Selection Guide, 2015.
[12] Stratasys Ltd., Guide to Basic Post Process Applications – Objet line of 3D Printers. 2013, pp. 17-19.
[13] K. Siebertz, D. van Bebber, T. Hochkirchen, Statistische Versuchsplanung. Design of Experiments (DoE). Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag, 2010, p. 6.
[14] Standard. DIN German Institute for Standardization e. V., DIN 16742, 2012.