Reconsidering the Legitimacy of Capital Punishment in the Interpretation of the Human Right to Life in the Two Traditional Approaches

Authors: Yujie Zhang

Abstract:

There are debates around the legitimacy of capital punishment, i.e., whether death could serve as a proper execution in our legal system or not. Different arguments have been raised. However, none of them seem able to provide a determined answer to the issue; this results in a lack of instruction in the legal practice. This article, therefore, devotes itself to the effort to find such an answer. It takes the perspective of rights, through interpreting the concept of right to life, which capital punishment appears to be in confliction with in the two traditional approaches, to reveal a possibly best account of the right and its conclusion on capital punishment. However, this effort is not a normative one which focuses on what ought to be. It means the article does not try to work out which argument we should choose and solve the hot debate on whether capital punishment should be allowed or not. It, again, does not propose which perspective we should take to approach this issue or generally which account of right must be better; rather, it is more a thought experiment. It attempts to raise a new perspective to approach the issue of the legitimacy of capital punishment. Both its perspective and conclusion therefore are tentative: what if we view this issue in a way we have never tried before, for example the different accounts of right to life? In this sense, the perspective could be defied, while the conclusion could be rejected. Other perspectives and conclusions are also possible. Notwithstanding, this tentative perspective and account of the right still could not be denied from serving as a potential approach, since it does have the ability to provide us with a determined attitude toward capital punishment that is hard to achieve through existing arguments.

Keywords: Capital punishment, right to life, theories of rights, the choice theory.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1129007

References:

[1] Michael Kronenwetter, Capital Punishment: A Reference Handbook (ABC-CLIO, 2001) p. 291.
[2] Mark Tunick, ‘Is Kant a Retributivist?’ (1996) xvii(1) History of Political Thought 60, pp. 67–8.
[3] Immanuel Kant, The Metaphysics of Morals (Mary Gregor trans and ed, Cambridge University Press, 1996) pp. 20-4, 105, 106, 107.
[4] David E Cooper, ‘Hegel’s Theory of Punishment’, in Z Pelczynski (ed), Hegel’s Political Philosophy: Problems and Perspective (Cambridge University Press, 1971) p. 151.
[5] Mark Tunick, Punishment: Theory and Practice (University of California Press, 1992) 87.
[6] J Angelo Corlett, ‘Making Sense of Retributivism’ (2001) 76 Philosophy 80.
[7] Immanuel Kant, Ground Work of Metaphysics of Morals (Mary Gregor and Jens Timmermann trans and (eds), Cambridge University Press, revised ed, 2012) p. 27.
[8] Nelson T Potter, ‘Kant and Capital Punishment Today’ (2002) 36(2) The Journal of Value Inquiry 267.
[9] Ted Honderich, Punishment: The Supposed Justifications (Penguin, 1976) p. 45.
[10] G W F Hegel, The Philosophy of Right (Alan White trans, Focus Publication, 2002) pp. 80–4, 85.
[11] E Lambert, A Clarke and J Lambert, ‘Reasons for Supporting and Opposing Capital Punishment in the USA: A Preliminary Study’ (2004) 1 The Internet Journal of Criminology 1, p. 7.
[12] Robert Blecker, The Death of Punishment: Searching for Justice among the Worst of the Worst (Palgrave MacMillan, 2013) Appendix A.
[13] Andrew Oldenquist, The Non-Suicidal Society (Indiana University Press, 1986) p. 215.
[14] BBC, Capital Punishment: Arguments against Capital Punishment (2014) , 16 August 2015.
[15] Caycie D Bradford, ‘Waiting to Die, Dying to Live: An Account of the Death Row Phenomenon from a Legal Viewpoint’ (2010) 5(1) Interdisciplinary Journal of Human Rights Law 77, p. 77.
[16] Death Penalty Information Center, Time on Death Row , 18 August 2015.
[17] Craig Haney, ‘Condemning the Other in Death Penalty Trials: Biographical Racism, Structural Mitigation, and the Empathic Divide’ (2004) 53 DePaul Law Review 1557, p. 1559.
[18] William W Berry III, ‘More Different than Life, Less Different than Death: The Argument for According Life Without Parole Its Own Category of Heightened Review Under the Eighth Amendment After Graham v. Florida’ (2010) 71(6) Ohio State Law Journal 1109, p. 1124.
[19] Samuel R Gross, ‘The Romance of Revenge: Capital Punishment in America’ (1993) 13 Study of Law, Politics & Society 71, p. 79.
[20] Ernest van de Haag, ‘The Ultimate Punishment: A Defense’ (1996) 99(7) Harvard Law Review 1662.
[21] Cesare Beccaria, On Crimes and Punishments, and Other Writings (Richard Davies, Virginia Cox and Richard Bellamy trans, Cambridge University Press, 1995) pp. 31, 10-1, 68-9.
[22] Antony Duff, Punishment, Communication, and Community (Oxford University Press, 2001) pp. 19–20.
[23] Mark A Michael, ‘Utilitarianism and Retributivism: What’s the Difference’ (1992) 29 American Philosophical Quarterly 173.
[24] A Woods, ‘Moral Judgments and International Crimes: The Disutility of Desert’ (2006) 52(3) Virginia Journal of International Law 633.
[25] Mary MacKenzie, Plato on Punishment (University of California Press, 1981) p. 29.
[26] H L A Hart, Punishment and Responsibility: Essays in the Philosophy of Law (Clarendon Press, 1968) pp. 81–2.
[27] Tomislav V Kovandzic, Lynne M Vieraitis and Denise Paquette Boots, ‘Does the Death Penalty Save Lives? New Evidence from State Panel Data, 1977 to 2006’ (2009) 8(4) American Society of Criminology 803.
[28] Baze v Rees (2008) 553 US 35, 75.
[29] Robert M Bohm, ‘Karl Marx and the Death Penalty’ (2008) 16 Critical Criminology 285.
[30] Karl Marx, ‘Capital Punishment. — Mr. Cobden’s Pamphlet. — Regulations of the Bank of England’, in New-York Daily Tribune, Karl Marx in New-York Tribune 1853 , 10 October 2015.
[31] W Bowers, Legal Homicide: Death Penalty as Punishment in America, 1864-1982 (Northeastern University Press, 1984) p. 333.
[32] J Gorecki, Capital Punishment: Criminal Law and Social Evolution (Columbia University Press, 1983) p. 85.
[33] Death Penalty Information Center, Deterrence: States without the Death Penalty Have Had Consistently Lower Murder Rates , 18 August 2015.
[34] Isaac Ehrlich, ‘The Deterrent Effect of Capital Punishment: A Question of Life and Death’ (1975) 65 American Economics Review 397.
[35] Marlene W Lehtinen, ‘The Value of Life — An Argument for the Death Penalty’ (1977) 23(3) Crime and Delinquency 237, p. 239.
[36] D Johnson and F Zimring, The Next Frontier: National Development, Political Change, and the Death Penalty in Asia (Oxford University Press, 2009) 302.
[37] Hashem Dezhbakhsh and Joanna M Shepherd, ‘The Deterrent Effect of Capital Punishment: Evidence from a “Judicial Experiment”’ (2006) 44(3) Economic Inquiry 512.
[38] Carol S Steiker and Jordan M Steiker, ‘Cost and Capital Punishment: A New Consideration Transforms an Old Debate’ (2010) 2010 The University of Chicago Legal Forum 117.
[39] Executing the Will of the Voters: a Roadmap to Mend or End the California Legislature’s Multi-Billion-Dollar Death Penalty Debacle (2011).
[40] Gerald W Smith, ‘The Value of Life — Arguments against the Death Penalty: A Reply to Professor Lehtinen’ (1977) 23(3) Crime and Delinquency 253, p. 258.
[41] H Bedau, The Death Penalty in America (Oxford University Press, 3rd ed, 1982) p.193.
[42] Jeremy Bentham, The Works of Jeremy Bentham, Published under the Superintendence of his Executor, John Bowring (William Tait, 1838-1843) vol 1, pp. 168, 448.
[43] Marvin E Wolfgang, ‘Current Trends in Penal Philosophy’ (1979) 14 Israel Law Review 427, p. 433, 434.
[44] Bruce P Smith, ‘The History of Wrongful Execution’ (2005) 56 Hastings Law Journal 1185.
[45] Michael L Radelet and Barbara A Zsembik, ‘Executive Clemency in Post-Furman Capital Cases’ (1993) 27 University of Richmond Law Review 289, pp. 289–90.
[46] The Sydney Morning Herald, Tough Fight Remains to Halt Barbaric Death Penalty (30 November 2011) , 12 November 2015.
[47] USA Today, Can Norwegian Punishment Fit the Crime? (27 July 2011) .
[48] Death Penalty Information Center, International Polls and Studies , 18 August 2015.
[49] Gallup, In US, 64% Support Death Penalty in Cases of Murder (8 November 2010) , 20 October 2015.
[50] Richard Boudreaux, Belarus President Claims Referendum Victory (26 November 1996) Los Angeles Times .
[51] Jason Burke, Delhi Gang-Rape Trial: Death Sentence Inevitable, Says Indian Minister (10 September 2013) Theguardian .
[52] Christina Mancini and Daniel P Mears, ‘To Execute or Not to Execute? Examining Public Support for Capital Punishment of Sex Offenders’ (2010) 38 Journal of Criminal Justice 959.
[53] News24, Youth ‘Want Death Penalty Reinstated’ (22 February 2013) , 12 October 2015.
[54] Samuel R Gross and Robert Mauro, Death and Discrimination: Racial Disparities in Capital Sentencing (Northeastern University Press, 1989) xiii.
[55] Dan Malone, ‘Cruel and Unusual: Executing the Mentally Ill’ (2005) Amnesty International Magazine.
[56] BBC, Arguments in Favor of Capital Punishment (2014) , 15 August 2015.
[57] Amanda K Eklund, ‘The Death Penalty in Montana: A Violation of the Constitutional Right to Individual Dignity’ (2004) 65 Montana Law Review 135.
[58] Amnesty International, ‘Abolish the Death Penalty’ (2015) , 18 August 2015.
[59] ‘Cesare Beccaria (1738-1794)’, in James Fieser and Bradley Dowden (eds), Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy (28 August 2015) ‘3. Against Capital Punishment’, 20 October 2015.
[60] Joel Feinberg, ‘Voluntary Euthanasia and the Inalienable Right to Life’ (1978) 7(2) Philosophy & Public Affairs 93.
[61] John Locke, Two Treatises of Government (Cambridge University Press, 1988) pp. 268, 271, 272, 274.
[62] John Stuart Mill, ‘Speech in Favor of Capital Punishment’, Ethics Updates , 14 October 2015.
[63] William Blackstone, Commentaries on the Law of England: A Facsimile of the First Edition of 1765-1769 (University of Chicago Press, 1979) vol 4, pp. 215–17, 373–79.
[64] Brian Calvert, ‘Locke on Punishment and the Death Penalty’ (1993) 68 (264) Philosophy 211, p. 212.
[65] Albert Camus, Resistance, Rebellion and Death (H Hamilton, 1961) pp. 129, 143.
[66] John Stuart Mill, ‘Parliamentary Debate on Capital Punishment within Prisons Bill’, in Hansard’s Parliamentary Debates (Hansard, 3rd series, 1868) pp. 1053–054.
[67] H L A Hart, ‘Bentham on Legal Rights’, in Jules L Coleman (ed), Rights and Their Foundations (Garland Publishing, 1994) pp. 1, 26, 27.
[68] Joseph Raz, ‘Rights Theories and Public Trial’, (1997) 14 Journal of Applied Philosophy 169.
[69] Peter Jones, Rights (St Martin’s Press, 1994) pp. 22, 27-8.
[70] D N MacCormick, ‘Rights in Legislation’, in Carl Wellman (ed), Rights and Duties (Routledge, 2002) vol 1, pp. 149, 150, 152.
[71] Hillel Steiner, ‘Working Rights’, in M Kramer, N E Simmonds and H Steiner (eds), A Debate over Rights: Philosophical Enquiries (Oxford University Press, 1998) pp. 233, 239.
[72] N E Simmonds, ‘Rights at the Cutting Edge’, in M Kramer, N E Simmonds and H Steiner (eds), A Debate over Rights: Philosophical Enquiries (Oxford University Press, 1998) pp. 113, 114.
[73] Immanuel Kant, Critique of Practical Reason (Mary Gregor trans and ed, Cambridge University, 1997) p. 17.
[74] WILLKÜR, Rreie Willkür (German)’, in Dictionary of Untranslatables: A Philosophical Lexicon (Princeton University Press, 2013), retrieved from , 20 October 2015.
[75] Jeremy Bentham, An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation (Methuen, 1982) pp. 11–2, 159.
[76] Jeremy Bentham, The Principles of Morals and Legislation (Prometheus Books, 1988) p. 1.
[77] Jeremy Bentham, Theory of Legislation (Thoemmes Contimuum, 2004) vol 1, p. 144.
[78] John Stuart Mill, Utilitarianism (Longmans, Green, 10th ed, 1888) ch 4.
[79] Theodore Benditt, Rights (Rowman and Littlefield, 1982) pp. 14, 18.
[80] H L A Hart, ‘Are There any Natural Rights?’, in Jules L Coleman (ed), Rights and Their Foundations (Garland Publishing, 1994) pp. 33, 184–85.
[81] H L A Hart, The concept of Law (Clarendon Press, first published 1961, 1994ed) vi, 61, 247, 251–52.
[82] Danny Priel, ‘Farewell to the Exclusive-Inclusive Debate’ (2005) 25(4) Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 675.
[83] H L A Hart, ‘Definition and Theory in Jurisprudence’, in Essays in Jurisprudence and Philosophy (Clarendon Press, 1983) 26.
[84] H L A Hart, ‘Between Utility and Rights’ (1979) 79 Columbia Law Review 827.
[85] Joseph Raz, The Authority of Law (Clarendon Press, 1979) pp. 233–49.
[86] Vittorio Villa, ‘Neil MacCormick’s Legal Positivism’ (2009) Law as Institutional Normative Order 45.
[87] Joseph Raz, ‘Authority, Law and Morality’ (1985) 68 The Monist 295, p. 299.
[88] Joseph Raz, ‘On the Nature of Rights’ (1984) 93(370) Mind 194.
[89] D N MacCormick, Practical Reason in Law and Morality (Oxford University Press, 2008) pp. 50–6.
[90] David Lyons, ‘Moral Aspects of Legal Theory’ (1982) 7(1) Midwest Studies in Philosophy 223, 249.
[91] David Lyons, ‘Rights, Claimants, and Beneficiaries’ (1969) 6 American Philosophical Quarterly 173, p. 176.
[92] Immanuel Kant, Lectures on Ethics (Harper and Row, Louis Infield trans, 1963, 48–52) p. 214.
[93] Peter J Steinberger, ‘Hegel on Crime and Punishment’ (1983) 77 American Political Science Review 870.
[94] Andrew von Hirsch, ‘Proportionality in the Philosophy of Punishment’ (1992) 16 Crime and Justice 55.
[95] Tony Draper, ‘An Introduction to Jeremy Bentham’s Theory of Punishment’ (2002) 5 Journal of Bentham Studies 1, 12.
[96] John Stuart Mill, The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill (University of Toronto Press, Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1963-1991) vol X, 207.
[97] John Rawls, Collected Papers (Harvard University Press, 1999) pp. 24, 27, 28.
[98] Michael Clark, ‘Mill on Capital Punishment — Retributive overtones?’ (2004) 42(3) Journal of the History of Philosophy 327, 327, 328.
[99] D Baumgardt, Bentham and the Ethics of Today (Princeton University Press, 1952) 361, 459.
[100] Joseph Raz, ‘Legal Rights’, (1984) 4 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 1.
[101] D N MacCormick, ‘Rights, Claims and Remedies’ (1982) 1 Law and Philosophy 337, p. 338.
[102] C B Pulido, ‘The Rationality of Balancing’ (2007) 92 Archiv Für Rechts-und Sozial Philophie 195.
[103] Joseph Raz, ‘Human Rights in the Emerging World Order’, in Brian Bix and Horacio Spector (eds), Rights: Concepts and Contexts (Ashgate Publishing, 2012) pp. 51, 54.
[104] Danuta Mendelson and Mirko Bagaric, ‘Assisted Suicide through the Prism of the Right to Life’ (2013) 36 International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 406.
[105] Sean Coyle, ‘”Protestant” Political Theory and the Significance of Rights’, in Brian Bix and Horacio Spector (eds), Rights: Concepts and Contexts (Ashgate Publishing, 2012).
[106] Siegfried Van Duffel, ‘The Nature of Rights Debate Rests on a Mistake’ (2012) 93(1) Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 104, p. 115.
[107] Horacio Spector, ‘Value Pluralism and the Two Concepts of Rights’ (2009) 46(4) San Diego Law Journal 819.