The Influence of Congruence between Incentive System and Locus of Control on Team Performance: An Experiment

Authors: Siti Mutmainah, Slamet Sugiri

Abstract:

Organizations are increasingly relying upon teamwork; however, little is known about the best fit among incentive system, team composition, and group performance. To further explore this issue this study examines whether the congruence between incentive system and locus of control (LoC) affects team performance. To reconcile opposite lines of argument in literature regarding the best incentive system for a team, this paper uses the social identity perspective and person-environment (P-E) fit theory to understand behavior in a group process. A laboratory experiment with postgraduate students is conducted to test the hypotheses. One hundred and five accounting students were assigned to three-person work groups, where they completed an independent task under one of two types of incentive—individual and group incentive systems—after their LoC was measured. The findings confirm the hypothesis. Group incentive results in an enhanced team performance. Team performance is better when there is congruence between incentive system and LoC. Group incentive system combined with external LoC results in the best performance, while individual incentive system results in a better team performance when combined with internal LoC. The result suggests that a cooperative process enables ‘ordinary people’ to obtain extraordinary results.

Keywords: Incentive system, locus of control, person-environment fit, social identity perspective, team performance.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1129005

References:

[1] Ahlgren, A., I. Anderson, and H. Skold. 2007. Individual versus team-based reward system: a study on how organizations argue for their choice. Essay in Management Control. School of Business Economics and Law, Goteborg University.
[2] Ambrose, M. L., and C. T., Kulik. 1999. Old friends, new faces: Motivation research in the 1990s. Journal of Management 25: 231–292.
[3] Boone, C., W.V. Olffen, and A.V. Witteloostuijn. 2005. Team locus-of-control composition, leadership structure, information acquisition, and financial performance: A business simulation study. Academy of Management Journal 48 (5): 889-909.
[4] Bradley, B. H., A. C. Klotz, B. E. Postlethwaite, and K. G. Brown. 2013. Ready to rumble: How team personality composition and task conflict interact to improve performance. Journal of Applied Psychology 98: 385–392
[5] Brownell, P.1981. Participation in budgeting, locus of control, and organizational effectiveness. The Accounting Review 56, 844-860.
[6] Cable, D.M., and J.R. Edwards. 2004. Complementary and supplementary fit: A theoritical and empirical integration. Journal of Applied Psychology 89: 822-834.
[7] Chatman, J.A. 1989. Improving interactional organizational research: A model of person-organization fit. Academy of Management Review 14: 333-349.
[8] Che, Y., and S. Yoo. 2001. Optimal incentives for teams. The American Economic Review 91 (3): 525–541.
[9] Darshani, R.K.N.D. 2014. A review of personality types and locus of control as moderators of stress and conflict management. Journal of Scientific and Research Publication 4 (2): 1-8.
[10] Dawes, R.M., 1980. Social dilemmas. Annual Review of Psychology 31: 169-193.
[11] DeMatteo, J.S., L.T. Eby, and E. Sundstrom. 1998. Team-based rewards: Current empirical evidence and directions for future research. Research in Organizational Behavior 20: 141-183.
[12] Deutsch, M. 1990. Sixty years of conflict. The International Journal of Conflict Management 1: 237–263.
[13] Devine, D. J., L. D. Clayton, J. L. Phillips, B. B. Dunford, and S. B. Melner. 1999. Groups in organizations: Prevalence, characteristics and effectiveness. Small Group Research 30 (6): 678–711.
[14] Eisenhardt, K.M. 1989. Agency theory: an assessment and review. The Academy of Management Review 14 (1): 57-74.
[15] Ellemers, N., D.D. Gilder, and S.A. Haslam. 2004. Motivating individuals and groups at work: A social identity perspective on leadership and group performance. Academy of Management Review 29 (3): 459-478.
[16] Fisher, G. B. Sprinkle, and L. L. Walker. 2008. Incentive compensation: Bridging theory and practice. Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance 19 (3): 35–40.
[17] Frucot, V., and W. T. Shearon. 1991. Budgetary participation, locus of control, and Mexican managerial performance and job satisfaction. The Accounting Review 66 (January): 80-99.
[18] George, J.M. 1992. The role of personality in organizational life: Issues and evidence. Journal of Management 18 (2): 185-213.
[19] Gist, M.E., Locke, E.A., and Taylor, M.S. 1987. Organizational Behavior: Group Structure, Process, and Effectiveness. Journal of Management 13 (2): 237-257.
[20] Greguras, G.J. and J.M. Diefendorff. 2009. Different Fits Satisfy Different Needs: Linking Person-Environment Fit to Employee Commitment and Performance Using Self-Determination Theory. Journal of Applied Psychology 94 (2): 465-477.
[21] Guzzo, R., R. Jette, and R. Katzell. 1985. The effects of psychologically-based intervention programs on worker productivity: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology 38 (Summer): 275-291.
[22] Halfhill, T., E. Sundstrom, J. Lahner, W. Caderone, and T.M. Nielsen. 2005. Group personality composition and group effectiveness: an integrative review of empirical research. Small Group Researh 36 (1): 83-105.
[23] Holmstrom, B. 1982. Moral hazard in teams. Bell Journal of Economics 13 (2): 324-340.
[24] Honeywell-Johnson, J. A., and A. M. Dickinson. 1999. Small group incentives: A review of the literature. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management 19 (2): 89-120.
[25] Huang, S.M. and W.H. Lai. 2014. A study of the effect of incentive system on job performance-locus of control as a moderator. The Journal of International Management Studies 9 (1): 89-98.
[26] Hyatt, T.A., dan D.F. Prawitt. 2001. Does congruence between audit structure and auditors locus of control affect job performance? The Accounting Review 76 (2): 263-274.
[27] Judge, T.A., and J.E. Bono. 2001. Relationship of core self-evaluation traits—self-esteem, generalized self-efficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability—with job satisfaction and job performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology 86 (1): 80-92.
[28] Kelly, K. 2010. The effects of incentives on information exchange and decision quality in groups. Behavioral Research in Accounting 22 (1): 43–65.
[29] Khan, M.S., R.J. Breitenecker, and E.J. Schwarz. 2014. Entrepreneurial team locus of control: diversity and trust. Management Decision 52 (6): 1057-1081.
[30] Kim, H., K.L. Sutton, dan Y. Gong, 2013. Group-based pay-for-performance plans and firm performance: The moderating role of empowerment practices, Asia Pacific Journal of Management 30: 31-52.
[31] Kramer, A., D. P. Bhave, and T. D. Johnson. 2014. Personality and group performance: The importance of personality composition and work tasks. Personality and Individual Differences 58: 132–137.
[32] Kristof-Brown, A.L., R.D. Zimmerman, and E.C. Johnson, 2005. Consequences of individuals’ fit at work: A meta-analysis of person-job, person-organization, person-group, and person-supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology 58, 281-342.
[33] LePine, J.A., B.R. Buckman, E.R. Crawford, and J.R. Methot. 2011. A review of research on personality in teams: accounting for pathways spanning level of theory and analysis. Human Resource Management Review 21: 311-330.
[34] Libby, T. and L. Thorne. 2009. The influence of incentive structure on group performance in assembly lines and teams. Behavioral Research in Accounting 21 (2): 57-72.
[35] London, M. and G.R. Oldham. 1977. A comparison of group and individual incentive plans. Academy of Management Journal 20 (1): 34-41.
[36] Lu, L., S. Kao, C.L. Cooper, and P.E. Spector. 2000. Managerial stress, locus of control, and job strain in Taiwan and UK: A comparative study. International Journal of Stress Management 7 (3): 209-226.
[37] McGee, H.M., A.M. Dickinson, B.E. Huitema, and K.M. Cullig. 2006. The effects of individual and group monetary incentives on high performance. Performance Improvement Quarterly 19 (4): 101-124.
[38] Muchinsky P.M. and C.J. Monahan, 1987. What is person-environment congruence? Supplementary versus complementary models of fit. Journal of Vocational Behavior 31 (3): 268-277.
[39] Naranjo-Gil, D., G. Cuevas-Rodriguez, and A. Lopez-Cabrales. 2012. The effects of incentive system and cognitive orientation on teams’ performance. Behavioral Research in Accounting 24 (2): 177-191.
[40] Ng, T. W. H., K. L. Sorensen, and L. T. Eby, 2006. Locus of control at work: meta-analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior 27: 1057-1987.
[41] Nunnally, J.C. 1978. Psychometric Theory. Second Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
[42] Pinder, C.C., 1998. Work Motivation in Organizational Behavior. NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
[43] Ramirez, C.M. 2013. Teams: A Competency Based Approach. Routledge. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=u-IkAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA58&lpg= PA58&dq=.
[44] Raven, J.C. 2014. Raven’s Progressive Matrices. Pearson.
[45] Ravenscroft, S. P., and S. Haka. 1996. Incentive plans and opportunities for information sharing. Behavioral Research in Accounting 8: 114–133.
[46] Rosenbaum, M. E., D. L. Moore, J. L. Cotton, M. S. Cook, R. A. Hieser, N. Shovar, and M. J. Gray. 1980. Group productivity and process: Pure and mixed reward structures and task interdependence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39 (4): 626–642.
[47] Rotter, J.B. 1966. Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied 80 (1): 1-28.
[48] Rowe, C. 2004. The effect of accounting report structure and team structure on performance in cross-functional teams. The Accounting Review 79 (4): 1153-1180.
[49] Siegel, G. and H. Ramanauskas-Marconi. 1989. Behavioral Accounting. Cincinnati: South-Western Publishing Co.
[50] Siemsen, E., S. Balasubramaniam, and A.V. Roth. 2007. Incentive that induce task-relatif effort, helping, and knowledge sharing in workgroups. Management Science 53 (10): 1533-1550.
[51] Taricone, P. and J. Luca. 2002. Successful Teamwork: A Case Study. HERDSA.
[52] Taylor, E. Z. 2006. The effect of incentives on knowledge sharing in computer-mediated communication: An experimental investigation. Journal of Information Systems 20 (1): 103–116.
[53] Tjosvold, D. 1984. Cooperation theory and organizations. Human Relations 37 (9): 743-767.
[54] Toivonen, A. and P.U. Toivonen. 2014. The transformative effect of top management governance choices on project team identity and relationship with the organization—an agency and stewardship approach. International Journal of Project Management 32: 1358-1370.
[55] Van Alstyne, M. S. 2005. Create colleagues, not competitors. Harvard Business Review 83 (9): 24–28.
[56] Wei, F. and S. Si. 2013. Tit for tat? Abusive supervision and counterproductive work behaviors: The oderating effects of locus of control and perceived mobility. Asia Pacific Journal of Management 30: 281-26.
[57] Young, S. M., J. Fisher, and T. M. Lindquist. 1993. The effects of intergroup competition and intragroup cooperation on slack and output in a manufacturing setting. The Accounting Review 68 (3): 466–481.