Rail Corridors between Minimal Use of Train and Unsystematic Tightening of Population: A Methodological Essay
Authors: A. Benaiche
Abstract:
In the current situation, the automobile has become the main means of locomotion. It allows traveling long distances, encouraging urban sprawl. To counteract this trend, the train is often proposed as an alternative to the car. Simultaneously, the favoring of urban development around public transport nodes such as railway stations is one of the main issues of the coordination between urban planning and transportation and the keystone of the sustainable urban development implementation. In this context, this paper focuses on the study of the spatial structuring dynamics around the railway. Specifically, it is a question of studying the demographic dynamics in rail corridors of Nantes, Angers and Le Mans (Western France) basing on the radiation of railway stations. Consequently, the methodology is concentrated on the knowledge of demographic weight and gains of these corridors, the index of urban intensity and the mobility behaviors (workers’ travels, scholars' travels, modal practices of travels). The perimeter considered to define the rail corridors includes the communes of urban area which have a railway station and communes with an access time to the railway station is less than fifteen minutes by car (time specified by the Regional Transport Scheme of Travelers). The main tools used are the statistical data from the census of population, the basis of detailed tables and databases on mobility flows. The study reveals that the population is not tightened along rail corridors and train use is minimal despite the presence of a nearby railway station. These results lead to propose guidelines to make the train, a real vector of mobility across the rail corridors.
Keywords: Coordination between urban planning and transportation, Rail corridors, Railway stations, Travels.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1340084
Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1137References:
[1] G. Wackermann and J. Dubois-Maury, Ville et environnement. Paris: Ellipses, 2005.
[2] Centre d’analyse Stratégique, Les nouvelles mobilités dans les territoires périurbains et ruraux. Paris: La documentation française, 2012.
[3] Y. Hanin, Mutations spatiales et recompositions territoriales. Louvain-la-Neuve : Presses université de Louvain, 2004.
[4] D. Pumain, “Chemin de fer et croissance urbaine en France au XIX e siècle”, in: Annales de géographie, 1982, pp. 529–550.
[5] D. Larroque and G. Jigaudon, Petites villes et infrastructures du transport 1851-1954. II: La France et la région, 1985.
[6] S. Séguret, “Résultats de l’étude RFF sur les étoiles ferroviaires de Strasbourg, Metz, Lille, Amiens et Lille”, in colloque les gares périurbaines points d’appui du développement urbain durable et du réseau ferré, Paris, 2009, pp. 50-61.
[7] X. Desjardins, S. Seguret and F. Beaucire, “Urbanisation et corridors ferroviaires: quel degré de relation?”, in Données urbaines 6, D. Pumain, M.F. Mattei, dir. Paris : Economica, 2011, pp. 313-326.
[8] V. Kaufmann, D. Joye, F. Sager and Y. Ferrari, Coordonner transports et urbanisme. Lausanne: Presses polytechniques et universitaires romandes, 2003.
[9] Certu, Les typologies de gares Quels enjeux ? Quelles méthodes ? Lyon: Certu, 2012.
[10] Plan de Déplacements Régional des Voyageurs de la région Pays de la Loire, 2007
[11] Audiar, Dynamiques démographiques dans les couloirs ferroviaires de l’aire urbaine rennaise. Observatoire déplacements. Rennes: Audiar, 2012.
[12] M. Wolkowitsch, Géographie des transports. Paris: Armand Colin, 1973.
[13] J.-F. Troin, Rail et aménagement du territoire: des héritages aux nouveaux défis. Aix-en-Provence: Edisud, 1995.
[14] H. Pretsch, A. Spieshöfer, B. Puccio, C. Soulas, R. Leclercq and G. Bentayou, Enseignements du projet Bahn.Ville. Deufrako, 2005.
[15] Reinvent the peri-urban territories with their stations – synthesis hsttp://www.territoires-ville.cerema.fr/IMG/pdf/synthese_08-11-2013_vf_cle7c494f.pdf
[16] I. Roussel, G. Vera-Navas, M. Magnan and E. Humbert, Quel devenir pour les infrastructures de transport ferroviaire locales? La prise en compte des enjeux environnementaux dans la gestion et le développement des infrastructures ferroviaires secondaires. 2012