Emergentist Metaphorical Creativity: Towards a Model of Analysing Metaphorical Creativity in Interactive Talk
Authors: Afef Badri
Metaphorical creativity does not constitute a static property of discourse. It is an interactive dynamic process created online. There has been a lack of research concerning online produced metaphorical creativity. This paper intends to account for metaphorical creativity in online talk-in-interaction as a dynamic process that emerges as discourse unfolds. It brings together insights from the emergentist approach to the study of metaphor in verbal interactions and insights from conceptual blending approach as a model for analysing online metaphorical constructions to propose a model for studying metaphorical creativity in interactive talk. The model is based on three focal points. First, metaphorical creativity is a dynamic emergent and open-to-change process that evolves in real time as interlocutors constantly blend and re-blend previous metaphorical contributions. Second, it is not a product of isolated individual minds but a joint achievement that is co-constructed and co-elaborated by interlocutors. The third and most important point is that the emergent process of metaphorical creativity is tightly shaped by contextual variables surrounding talk-in-interaction. It is grounded in the framework of interpretation of interlocutors. It is constrained by preceding contributions in a way that creates textual cohesion of the verbal exchange and it is also a goal-oriented process predefined by the communicative intention of each participant in a way that reveals the ideological coherence/incoherence of the entire conversation.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1128847Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 609
 G. Lakoff, and M. Turner, More Than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1989.
 Z. Kövecses, Where Metaphors Come from Reconsidering Context in Metaphor. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.
 Z. Kövecses, Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. 2econd ed. Oxford University Press, 2010.
 G. Lakoff, “The contemporary theory of metaphor,” in Metaphor and Thought, 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, 1992.
 G. Lakoff, and M. Johnson, Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books, 1999.
 G. Lakoff, and M. Johnson, Metaphors We Live By. New edition with Afterword, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2003.
 G. Lakoff, “The Invariance Hypothesis: is abstract reason based on image-schemas”? Cognitive Linguistics, vol. 1-1 1990.
 L. Cameron, Metaphor in educational discourse. Continuum, 2003.
 L. Cameron, “Patterns of metaphor use in reconciliation talk,” Discourse Society, vol 18 2end ed. 2007.
 L. Cameron, R. Maslen, T. Zazie, J. Maule, P. Stratton, and N. Stanley, “The discourse dynamics approach to metaphor and metaphor-led discourse analysis,” Metaphor and Symbol, vol. 24 2end ed. 2009.
 L. Cameron, and A. Deignan, “The emergence of metaphor in discourse,” Applied Linguistics, vol. 27 4th ed. Oxford University Press, 2006.
 J. Grady, T. Oakley, and S. Coulson, “Metaphor and blending,” in Metaphor in cognitive linguistics, G. Steen, & R. Gibbs, Ed. Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1999.
 G. Fauconnier, and M. Turner, “Conceptual integration networks,” in Cognitive Science vol. 22, 2end ed. 1998.
 S. Coulson, Semantic Leaps: Frame-Shifting and Conceptual Blending in Meaning Construction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
 S. Coulson, “Conceptual blending in thought, rhetoric, and ideology,” Cognitive Linguistics: Current Applications and Future Perspectives, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2006.
 G. Fauconnier, and M. Turner, The Way we Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. Basic Books, 2002.
 G. Fauconnier, and M. Turner, “Conceptual projection and middle spaces,” 1994.
 V. Stadelmann, “Language, cognition, interaction. conceptual blending as discursive practice,” Unpublished PhD thesis, 2012.
 E. Semino, Metaphor in Discourse. Cambridge University Press, 2008.
 J. Charteris-Black, Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. Palgrave Macmillan, 2004.
 M. Stone, “Communicative intentions and conversational processes in human-human and human-computer dialogue,” in World Situated Language Use: Psycholinguistic, Linguistic and Computational Perspectives on Bridging the Product and Action Traditions, J. Trueswell, and M. Tanenhaus, Ed. MIT Press, 2002.
 L. Brandt, and P. Brandt, “Making sense of a blend: a cognitive-semiotic approach to metaphor,” Annual review of cognitive linguistics, John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2005.
 A. Rocci, “Are manipulative texts ‘coherent’? manipulation, presuppositions and (in-)congruity,” In Manipulation and Ideologies in the Twentieth Century: Discourse, language, mind, L.de Saussure, and P. Schulz, Ed. 2005.
 S. Coulson, “Extemporaneous blending: conceptual integration in humorous discourse from talk radio,” Style, vol. 39, 2end ed. 2005.
 B. Nerlich, and N. Koteyko, “MRSA–portrait of a superbug: a media drama in three acts,” In Metaphor and Discourse, A. Mussolf, and J. Zinken, Ed. Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.
 R. Gibbs, and L. Cameron, “The social cognitive dynamics of metaphor performance,” in Cognitive Systems Research, vol. 9, 2008.
 P. Werth, “Extended metaphor-a text-world account,” in Language and literature, 2end ed. vol. 3, Longman Group Limited, 1994.
 M. Kimmel, “From metaphor to the “mental sketchpad”: literary macrostructure and compound image schemas in heart of darkness,” in Metaphor and symbol, 3d ed. vol. 20, Lawrence Erlbaum Assocaite, Inc. 2005.
 A. Musolff, Metaphor and Political Discourse: Analogical Reasoning in Debates about Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004.
 T. Van Dijk, Macrostructures: An Interdisciplinary Study of Global Structures in Discourse, Interaction, and Cognition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. 1980.
 T. Sanders, and W. Spooren, “Communicative intentions and coherence relations,” in coherence in spoken and written discourse: how to create it and how to describe it, W. Bublitz, U. Lenk, and E. Ventola, Ed. Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, vol. 63, 1997.
 H. Clark, Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
 T. Van Dijk, “Discourse semantics and ideology,” in Discourse & Society, 2end ed. vol. 6, SAGE (London, Thousands, Oaks, CA and New Delhi), 1995.