Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32007
Competitive Advantages of a Firm without Fundamental Technology: A Case Study of Sony, Casio and Nintendo

Authors: Kiyohiro Yamazaki


A purpose of this study is to examine how a firm without fundamental technology is able to gain the competitive advantage. This paper examines three case studies, Sony in the flat display TV industry, Casio in the digital camera industry and Nintendo in the home game machine industry. This paper maintain the firms without fundamental technology construct two advantages, economic advantage and organizational advantage. An economic advantage involves the firm can select either high-tech or cheap devices out of several device makers, and change the alternatives cheaply and quickly. In addition, organizational advantage means that a firm without fundamental technology is not restricted by organizational inertia and cognitive restraints, and exercises the characteristic of strength.

Keywords: Firm without fundamental technology, economic advantage, organizational advantage, Sony, Casio, Nintendo.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI):

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1161


[1] Wernerfelt, B. (1984) “A Resource-Based View of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal, 5, 171-180.
[2] Barney, J. B. (1991) “Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage”, Journal of Management, 17, 1, 99-120.
[3] Prahalad, C K. and G. Hamel (1990) “The Core Competence of the Corporation,” Harvard Business Review, 68, 3, 79-91.
[4] Itami, H. (1987) Mobilizing Invisible Assets, Harvard University School Press.
[5] McEvily, S. and B. Chakravarthy (2002) “The Persistence of Knowledge-based Advantage: An Empirical Test for Product Performance and Technological Knowledge,” Strategic Management Journal, 23, 4, 285-305.
[6] Nelson, R. and S. Winter (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Harvard Business School Press.
[7] Rumelt, R. (1984) “Towards a Strategic Theory of the Firm,” in Competitive Strategic Management, R. Lumb(ed.), Prentice-Hall.
[8] Dierickx, I. and K. Cool (1989) “Asset Stock Accumulation and Sustainability of Competitive Advantage,” Management Science, 35, 12, 1504-1514.
[9] Peteraf, M. (1993) “The Cornerstones of Competitive Advantage: A Resource-Based View,” Strategic Management Journal, 14, 3, 179-191.
[10] Levitt, B. and J. March (1988) “Organizational Learning,” American Review of Sociology, 14, pp. 319-340.
[11] Leonard-Barton, D. (1995) Wellsprings of knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Sources of Innovation, Harvard Business School Press.
[12] Ulrich, K. T. (1995) “The Role of Product Architecture in The Manufacturing Firm,” Research Policy, 24, 419-440.
[13] Baldwin, C Y. and Kim B. Clark (2000) Design Rules: The Power of Modularity, MIT Press.
[14] Dedrick, J., K. Kraemer, and G. Linden (2008) “Who profits from innovation in global value chain? A study of the iPod and Notebook PCs,” Sloan Industry Studies working papers, WP, 2008-2015.
[15] Linden, G., K. Kraemer and J. Dedrick (2009) “Who captures value in a global innovation network? The case of Apple’s iPod,” Communications of the Acm. 52, 3, 140-144.
[16] March, J and H. Simon (1958) Organizations, John Wiley & Sons.
[17] Christensen, C M. (1997) The Innovator’s Dilemma, Harvard Business School Press.