A Study of Primary School Parents’ Interaction with Teachers’ in Malaysia
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 33093
A Study of Primary School Parents’ Interaction with Teachers’ in Malaysia

Authors: Shireen Simon

Abstract:

This study explores the interactions between primary school parents-teachers in Malaysia. Schools in the country are organized to promote participation between parents and teachers. Exchanges of dialogue are most valued between parents and teachers because teachers are in daily contact with pupils’ and the first line of communication with parents. Teachers are considered by parents as the most important connection to improve children learning and well-being. Without a good communication, interaction or involvement between parent-teacher might tarnish a pupils’ performance in school. This study tries to find out multiple emotions among primary school parents-teachers, either estranged or cordial, when they communicate in a multi-cultured society in Malaysia. Important issues related to parent-teacher interactions are discussed further. Parents’ involvement in an effort to boost better education in school is significantly more effective with parents’ involvement. Lastly, this article proposes some suggestions for parents and teachers to build a positive relationship with effective communication and establish more democratic open door policy.

Keywords: Multi-cultured society, parental involvement, parent-teacher relationships, parents’ interaction.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1339992

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 2683

References:


[1] Epstein, L.J. (2001) School, Family and Community Partnerships: Preparing educators and improving schools. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
[2] Wan Abd Aziz Wan Mohd Amin (2002). Hubungan Komunikasi Kepimpinan Pengetua dan Esteem Kendiri Guru Dengan Keberkesanan Interpersonal Guru. Institut Aminuddin Baki: Seminar Nasional Pengurusan dan Kepimpinan Pendidikan ke -11.
[3] Abdullah Sani Yahaya. (2002) Menguruskan Sekolah. Kuala Lumpur: PTS Publishing Sdn.Bhd.
[4] Alimuddin Mohd Dom (2006). “Meningkatkan Prestasi Sekolah Melalui Kerjasama Dengan Ibu Bapa dan Komuniti Setempat.” Edisi Pertama. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. 7 – 14.
[5] Abdul Rafie Mahat. (2007). “Perkongsian Pintar Dalam Pendidikan.” Pendidik.39. 52 – 53.
[6] Khairulaniza Khairudin (2007). “Peranan Ibu Bapa Membangunkan Modal Insan.” Jurnal Ehwal Pendidikan. 1. 38 – 41.
[7] Halpin, A., & Croft, D. (1963). The organizational climate of schools. Chicago: The University of Chicago.
[8] Hoy, W.K., & Furguson, J. (1985). A theoretical framework and exploration of organizational effectiveness in schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 21, 117-134.
[9] Riehl, C., & Sipple, J. W. (1996). Making the most of time and talent: Secondary school organizational climates, teaching task environments, and teacher commitment. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 873-901.
[10] Rohaty Mohd Majzub. (2003). Pendidikan prasekolah: Cabaran Kualiti (Syarahan Perdana). Bangi: Penerbitan Malindo Sdn. Bhd.
[11] Houtenville, A., & Conway, K. (2008). Parental effort, school resources, and student achievement. Journal of Human Resources, 43, 437-453.
[12] Muhammad Iqmal Abdullah (2007). Tujuh Cara Tingkatkan Hubungan Sekolah Dengan Ibu bapa. Pendidik. 43.40 – 41.
[13] Mohd Ali Hasan (2007). “Peranan PIBG dalam Pelakanaan PIPP.” Pendidik.36. 65 – 67.
[14] Colombo, M. W. (2004). Family literacy nights…and other home-school connections. Educational Leadership, 61(8), 48-51.
[15] Kasahara, M., & Turnbull, A. P. (2005). Meaning of family-professional partnerships: Japanese mother’s perspectives. Exceptional Children, 71(3), 249-265.
[16] Lai, Y., & Ishiyama, F. I. (2004). Involvement of immigrant Chinese Canadian mothers of children with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 71(1), 97-108.
[17] Molland, J. (2004). We’re all welcome here. Instructor, 114(3), 22-25.
[18] Baez B. Confidentiality in qualitative research: Reflections on secrets, power and agency. Qualitative Research. 2002; 2:35–58.
[19] Crow G, Wiles R, Heath S, Charles V. Research ethics and data quality: The implications of informed consent. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 2006; 9:83–95.
[20] Evans, R. (2004). Talking with parents today. Independent School, 63(3), 96-100.
[21] Perl, J. (1995). Improving relationship skills for parent conferences. Teaching Exceptional Children, 27(5), 29-31.
[22] Studer, J. R. (1994). Listen so that parents will speak. Childhood Education, 70, 74-76.
[23] Chambers, L. (1998). How customer-friendly is your school? Educational Leadership, 56(2), 33-35.
[24] Minke, K.M., & Anderson, K.J. (2003). Restructuring routine parent-teacher conferences: The family-school conference model. The Elementary School Journal, 104(1), 49-69.
[25] Sheldon, S.B., & Epstein, J.L. (2005). Involvement counts: Family and community partnerships and mathematics achievement. Journal of Educational Research, 98, 196–206.
[26] Atkin, J. & Bastiani, J. (1988). Listening to parents: An approach to the improvement of home-school relations. New York: Croom Helm.
[27] Mayall, B. (1990). Parents in Secondary Education. London.
[28] Sheldon, S.B., & Epstein, J.L. (2002). Improving Student Behavior and School Discipline with Family and Community Involvement. Education and Urban Society, 35(1), 4-32.
[29] Jowett, S., & Baginsky, M. (1991). Building Bridges: Parental Involvement in School. Windsor: NFER, Nelson.
[30] Powell-Smith, K.A., Stoner, G., Shinn, M.R., & Good, R.H. (2000). Parent tutoring in reading using literature and curriculum materials: Impact on student reading achievement. School Psychology Review, 29, 5–27.
[31] Kraft MA, Dougherty SM. (2012). The Effect of Teacher-Family Communication on Student Engagement: Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness.
[32] Sirvani, H. (2007b). The effect of teacher communication with parents on students’ mathematics achievement. American Secondary Education, 36(1), 31-46.
[33] Bursztyn, L., & Coffman, L.C. (2010). The schooling decision: Family preferences, intergenerational conflict, and moral hazard in the Brazilian Favelas. Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
[34] Catsambis, S., & Beveridge, A.A. (2001). Does neighborhood matter? Family, neighborhood, and school influences on eight grade mathematics achievement. Sociological Focus, 34(4), 435-457.
[35] Simon, B.S. (2004). High school outreach and family involvement. Social Psychology of Education, 7(3), 185-209.
[36] Glascoe, FP (1997). Do parents discuss about children’s development with health care providers? Ambulatory Child Health 2: 349-356.
[37] Drew, C.J. Logan DR, Hardman, ML.(1984). Mental Retardation- A Lifecycle Approach. Toronto: Times Mirror Mostle College Publishing.
[38] Davern, L. (2004). School to home notebooks: What parents have to say. Council for Exceptional Children, 36 (5), 22-27.