Optimization of Process Parameters using Response Surface Methodology for the Removal of Zinc(II) by Solvent Extraction
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 33122
Optimization of Process Parameters using Response Surface Methodology for the Removal of Zinc(II) by Solvent Extraction

Authors: B. Guezzen, M.A. Didi, B. Medjahed

Abstract:

A factorial design of experiments and a response surface methodology were implemented to investigate the liquid-liquid extraction process of zinc (II) from acetate medium using the 1-Butyl-imidazolium di(2-ethylhexyl) phosphate [BIm+][D2EHP-]. The optimization process of extraction parameters such as the initial pH effect (2.5, 4.5, and 6.6), ionic liquid concentration (1, 5.5, and 10 mM) and salt effect (0.01, 5, and 10 mM) was carried out using a three-level full factorial design (33). The results of the factorial design demonstrate that all these factors are statistically significant, including the square effects of pH and ionic liquid concentration. The results showed that the order of significance: IL concentration > salt effect > initial pH. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) showing high coefficient of determination (R2 = 0.91) and low probability values (P < 0.05) signifies the validity of the predicted second-order quadratic model for Zn (II) extraction. The optimum conditions for the extraction of zinc (II) at the constant temperature (20 °C), initial Zn (II) concentration (1mM) and A/O ratio of unity were: initial pH (4.8), extractant concentration (9.9 mM), and NaCl concentration (8.2 mM). At the optimized condition, the metal ion could be quantitatively extracted.

Keywords: Ionic liquid, response surface methodology, solvent extraction, zinc acetate.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1339706

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1156

References:


[1] D. Beyersmann , H. Haase, “Function of zinc in signaling, proliferation and differentiation of mammalian cells,” Biometals, vol .14 , pp. 231-341, 2001.
[2] N. Wellinghausen, H. Kirchner, and L. Rink, “The Immunobiology of Zinc,” Immunol. Today, vol. 18, pp. 519-552, 1997.
[3] Olugbenga J. Owojori, Adriaan J. Reinecke, and Andrei B. Rozanov, “Effet of salinity on partitioning, uptake and toxicity of zinc in the earthworm Eisenia fetida,” Soil Biology et Biochemistry, vol. 40, pp. 2385-2393, 2008.
[4] Wei-Chun ma, Luc T.C. Bonten, “Bioavailability pathways underlying zinc-induced avoidance behavior and reproduction toxicity in Lumbricus rubellus earthworms,” Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, vol. 74, pp. 1721-1726, 2011.
[5] S. Azabou, T. Mechichi, and S. Sayadi,” Zinc precipitation by heavy-metal tolerant sulfate-reducing bacteria enriched on phosphogypsum as a sulfate source,” Miner. Eng., vol. 20, pp. 173-178, 2007.
[6] M. Stasiak, M. Regel-Rosocka, and A. Brorowiak-Resterna, Zinc extraction from chloride solutions with mixtures of solvating and chelating reagents,” Hydrometallurgy, vol 162, pp. 57-62, 2016.
[7] F. Tang, X. Li, C. Wei, G. Fan, R. Zhu, and C. Li,” Synergistic extraction of zinc from ammoniacal/ammonia sulfate solution by a mixture of β-diketone and 2-hydroxy-5-nonylacetophenone oxime,” Hydometallurgy, vol. 162, pp; 42-48, 2016.
[8] B. Guezzen, M. A. Didi, “Removal of Zn(II) from Aqueous Acetate Solution Using Di (2-Ethylhexyl) Phosphoric Acid & Tributylphosphate,” International Journal of Chemistry, vol.4, pp. 32-41, 2012.
[9] J. Plaza Cazon, M. Viera, E. Donati, and E. Guibal, “Zinc and cadmium removal by biosorption on Undaria pinnatifida in batch and continuous processes,” Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 129, pp. 423-434, 2013.
[10] S. Afroze, T. Kanti Sen, and H. Ming Ang, “Adsorption removal of zinc (II) from aqueous phase by raw and base modified Eucalyptus sheathiana bark: Kinetics, mechanism and equilibrium study,” Process Safety and Environmental Protection, vol. 102, pp. 336-352, 2016.
[11] M.F. San Roman, I. Ortiz Gandara, R. IBnez, I. Ortiz, “Hybrid membrane process for the recovery of major components (zinc, iron and HCl) from spent pickling effluents,” Journal of Membran Science, vol. 415, pp. 616-623, 2012.
[12] M.A. Martín-Lara, I.L. Rodríguez, G. Blázquez, M. Calero, “Factorial experimental design for optimizating the removal conditions of lead ionsfrom aqueous solutions by three wastes of the olive-oil production,” Desalination, vol. 278, pp. 132-140, 2011.
[13] S. J. Nejad, H. Abolghasemi, Mohammad A. Moosaviana, Mohammad G. Maragheh, “Fractional factorial design for the optimization of supercritical carbon dioxide extraction of La3+, Ce3+ and Sm3+ ions from a solid matrix using bis(2,4,4-trimethylpentyl)dithiophosphinic acid + tributylphosphate,” chemical engineering research and design, vol. 89, pp. 827-835, 2011.
[14] N. Ozturk, D. Kavak, “Boron removal from aqueous solutions by adsorption on waste sepiolite and activated waste sepiolite using Full Factorial design,” Adsorption, vol.10, pp. 245-257, 2004.
[15] B. Guezzen, M. A. Didi, “Removal and Analysis of Mercury (II) From Aqueous Solution by Ionic Liquids,” J Anal Bioanal Tech, vol.7, 1-8, 2016.
[16] W. Thanasarakhan, S. Liawruangrath, S. Wangkarn, and B. Liawruangrath, “Sequential injection spectrophotometric determination of zinc (II) in pharmaceuticals based on zinc (II)–PAN in non-ionic surfactant medium,” Talanta, vol. 71, pp. 1849-1855, 2007.
[17] K. Vimalashanmugam, T. Viruthagiri, “Response surface methodology optimization of process parameters for xylanase production by Aspergillus fumigatus in SSF using central composite design,” International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications, vol.2, pp.277-287, 2012.
[18] M. Rajasimman, R. Sangeetha, and P. Karthik, “Statistical optimization of process parameters for the extraction of chromium (VI) from pharmaceutical wastewater by emulsion liquid membrane,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 150, pp. 275-279, 2009.
[19] G.P.E. Box, W.G. Hunter, and J.S. Hunter, “Statistics for Experimenters,” 2nd ed., Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, pp. 363-385, 1978.