Numerical Analysis of Geosynthetic-Encased Stone Columns under Laterally Loads

Authors: R. Ziaie Moayed, M. Hossein Zade

Abstract:

Out of all methods for ground improvement, stone column became more popular these days due to its simple construction and economic consideration. Installation of stone column especially in loose fine graded soil causes increasing in load bearing capacity and settlement reduction. Encased granular stone columns (EGCs) are commonly subjected to vertical load. However, they may also be subjected to significant amount of shear loading. In this study, three-dimensional finite element (FE) analyses were conducted to estimate the shear load capacity of EGCs in sandy soil. Two types of different cases, stone column and geosynthetic encased stone column were studied at different normal pressures varying from 15 kPa to 75 kPa. Also, the effect of diameter in two cases was considered. A close agreement between the experimental and numerical curves of shear stress - horizontal displacement trend line is observed. The obtained result showed that, by increasing the normal pressure and diameter of stone column, higher shear strength is mobilized by soil; however, in the case of encased stone column, increasing the diameter had more dominated effect in mobilized shear strength.

Keywords: Ordinary stone column, validation, encased stone column, laterally load.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1128237

References:

[1] Bzbu, M.R.D, Nayak,S.(2013) :A Critical Review of Construction Analysis and Behaviour of Stone Columns, Geotech. Geol. Engg., 31,1-22.
[2] Ayadat, T., and Hanna, A. M. _2005_. “Encapsulated stone columns as a soil improvement technique for collapsible soil.” Ground Improv., 9_4_, 137.
[3] McKenna, J. M., Eyre, W. A. & Wolstenholme, D. R. (1975). Performance of an embankment supported by stone columns in soft ground. Ge´otechnique, 25, No. 1, 51–59.
[4] Al-Joulani, N. (1995). Laboratory and Analytical Investigation of Sleeve Reinforced Stone Columns. PhD thesis, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada,
[5] Murugesan, S. and Rajagopal K. (2006): Geosynthetic-encased stone columns: Numerical evaluation. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 24(6), 349-358.
[6] Gniel, J. and Bouazza, A. (2009): Improvement of soft soils using geogrid encased stone columns, Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 27, 167-175.
[7] Gniel, J. and Bouazza, A. (2010): Construction of geogrid encased stone columns: A new proposal based on laboratory testing, Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 28, 108-118.
[8] Murugesan, S. and Rajagopal, K. (2007): Model Tests on Geosynthtic Encased Stone Columns, GeosyntheticsInternational, 24(6), 349-358.
[9] Zhang, Y., Chan, D. and Wang, Y. (2012): Consolidation of composite foundation improved by geosynthetic-encased stone columns, Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 32, 10-17.
[10] Khabbazian, M., Kaliakin V.N. and Meehan, C.L. (2010): Numerical study of the effect of geosynthetic encasement on the behaviour of granular columns, Geosynthetics International, 17(3), 132-143.
[11] Almeida, M.S.S., Hosseinpour, I., Riccio, M. and Alexiew, D. (2014): Behaviour of Geotextile-Encased Granular Columns Supporting Test Embankment on Soft Deposit, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering. 141(3), 04014116
[12] Raju, V.S. (2001): Rehabilitation of Earthquake Damaged Berths at Kandla Port, Proceedings of the International Conference on Ocean Engineering, IIT Madras, Chennai, India, K55-K70.
[13] Murugesan, S. and Rajagopal, K. (2008): Shear load tests on stone columns with and without geosynthetic encasement, Geotech. Test. Journal, 32(1), 35-44.
[14] Miwa, S., Ikeda, T., Sato, T., 2006. Damage process of pile foundation in liquefied ground during strong ground motion. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 26 (2), 325e336.
[15] Ashford, S.A., Juirnarongrit, T., Sugano, T., Hamada, M., 2006. Soil-pile response to blast-induced lateral spreading. I: field test. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 132 (2), 152e162.
[16] Adalier, K., Elgamal, A., Meneses, J., Baez, J., 2003. Stone columns as liquefaction counter measure in non-plastic silty soils. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 23 (7),571e584.
[17] Ali, K., Shahu, J.T., Sharma, K.G., 2014. Model tests on single and groups of stone columns with different geosynthetic reinforcement arrangement. Geosynth. Int.21 (2), 103e118
[18] Castro, J., Karstunen, M., 2010. Numerical simulations of stone column installation. Can. Geotech. J. 47 (10), 1127e1138.
[19] Murugesan, S. & Rajagopal, K. (2006b). Numerical analysis of geosynthetic encased stone column. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Geosynthetics, Yokohama, Japan, pp. 1681–1684.
[20] Murugesan, S., Rajagopal, K., 2009. Studies on the behavior of single and group of geosynthetic encased stone columns. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 136 (1), 129e139.
[21] Yoo, C., 2010. Performance of geosynthetic-encased stone columns in embankment construction: numerical investigation. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 136 (8),1148e1160.
[22] Mohapatra, S., Rajagopal, K., Sharma, J., 2016. Direct shear tests on geosynthetic-encased granular columns. Geotext. Geomembr. 44 (2016) 396-405
[23] Jeong, S.G. Seo, Y.K. Choi, K.S "Design Charts of Piled Raft Foundations on Soft Clay" Proceedings of the 13th International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference: Honolulu, Hawaii, USA