Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 30135
Environmental Decision Making Model for Assessing On-Site Performances of Building Subcontractors

Authors: Buket Metin

Abstract:

Buildings cause a variety of loads on the environment due to activities performed at each stage of the building life cycle. Construction is the first stage that affects both the natural and built environments at different steps of the process, which can be defined as transportation of materials within the construction site, formation and preparation of materials on-site and the application of materials to realize the building subsystems. All of these steps require the use of technology, which varies based on the facilities that contractors and subcontractors have. Hence, environmental consequences of the construction process should be tackled by focusing on construction technology options used in every step of the process. This paper presents an environmental decision-making model for assessing on-site performances of subcontractors based on the construction technology options which they can supply. First, construction technologies, which constitute information, tools and methods, are classified. Then, environmental performance criteria are set forth related to resource consumption, ecosystem quality, and human health issues. Finally, the model is developed based on the relationships between the construction technology components and the environmental performance criteria. The Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (FAHP) method is used for weighting the environmental performance criteria according to environmental priorities of decision-maker(s), while the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method is used for ranking on-site environmental performances of subcontractors using quantitative data related to the construction technology components. Thus, the model aims to provide an insight to decision-maker(s) about the environmental consequences of the construction process and to provide an opportunity to improve the overall environmental performance of construction sites.

Keywords: Construction process, construction technology, decision making, environmental performance, subcontractors.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1127928

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 722

References:


[1] R. Pollo, A. Rivotti, "Building sustainability evaluation in the building process: The construction phase", in Proc. of Regional Central and Eastern European Conference on Sustainable Building, Warsaw: Building Research Institute, 2004, CD - ROM.
[2] I. Audus, P. Charles, S. Evans, Environmental good practice on site, London, 2010. Available from: https://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac-/sci/eng/eso/modules/year4/es94y/c692_environmental_good_practice_on_site_3rd_edition.pdf.
[3] M. Bilec, S.M. Asce, R. Ries, H.S. Matthews, A.M. Asce, A.L. Sharrard, "Example of a hybrid life-cycle assessment of construction processes", Journal of Infrastructure Systems, Vol. 12, No. 4, 2006, pp. 207–215. doi: 10.1061/ASCE1076-0342200612:4207.
[4] Z. Chen, H. Li, C.T.C. Wong, "EnvironalPlanning: Analytic network process model for environmentally conscious construction planning", Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 131, No. 1, 2005, pp. 92–101. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:1(92) CE.
[5] A. Fuertes, M. Casals, M. Gangolells, N. Forcada, M. Macarulla, X. Roca, "An environmental impact causal model for improving the environmental performance of construction processes", Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 52, 2013, pp. 425–437. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.02.005.
[6] M. Gangolells, M. Casals, N. Forcada, M. Macarulla, "Predicting on-site environmental impacts of municipal engineering works, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, Vol. 44, 2014, 43–57.
[7] A.A. Guggemos, A. Horvath, "Decision-support tool for assessing the environmental effects of constructing commercial buildings", Journal of Architectural Engineering, Vol. 12, No. 4, 2006, pp. 187–295. doi: 10.1061/?ASCE?1076-0431?2006?12:4?187?.
[8] L-Y. Shen, W-S. Lu, H. Yao, D-H. Wu, "A computer-based scoring method for measuring the environmental performance of construction activities", Automation in Construction, Vol. 14, No. 3, 2005, pp. 297–309. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2004.08.017.
[9] Building Research Establishment (BRE), BREEAM UK New Construction for Non-Domestic Buildings, Hertfordshire, 2014.
[10] B. Metin, A. Tavil, "The Relationship between Construction Technologies and Environmental Impacts", in Proc. of 40th IAHS World Congress on Housing, Funchal, Portugal, 2014.
[11] B. Metin, A. Tavil, Environmental performance assessment of building construction process during architectural detailing", in Proc. of Eco-Architecture 2016 - 6th International Conference on Harmonization between Architecture and Nature, Alicante, Spain, 2016.
[12] E. Edis, A Method to Design Architectural Constructional Elements (in Turkish). Istanbul Technical University, Graduate School of Science, Engineering and Technology, Istanbul, Ph.D. Thesis, 2006.
[13] ISO/TS 21929-1: Sustainability in building construction-Sustainability indicators-Part 1: Framework for the development of indicators for buildings. Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization (ISO), 2006.
[14] S. Humbert, A. De Schryver, X. Bengoa, M. Margni, O. Jolliet O, IMPACT 2002+: User Guide, 2002, Available from: http://www.quantis-intl.com/pdf/IMPACT2002_UserGuide_for_vQ2-.21.pdf.
[15] Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment, Eco-indicator 99 Manual for Designers, 2000, Available from: http://www.pre-sustainability.com/download/manuals/EI99_Manual.pdf.
[16] M.Goedkoop, R. Heijungs, M. Huijbregts, A. De Schryver, J. Stryijs, R. van Zelm, "ReCiPe 2008 - A life cycle impact assessment method which comprises harmonized category indicators at the midpoint and the endpoint level", 2013, Available from: http://www.pre-sustainability.com/download/manuals/ReCiPe_main_report_REVISED_13-07-2012.pdf.
[17] BS EN ISO 14031: Environmental management - Environmental performance evaluation-Guidelines. Brussels: International Organization for Standardization (ISO), 2013.
[18] PD ISO/TS 21929-2: BSI Standards Publication Sustainability in building construction-Sustainability indicators-Part 2: Framework for the development of indicators for civil engineering works. Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization (ISO), 2015.
[19] ISO 21931-1: Sustainability in building construction - Framework for methods of assessment of the environmental performance of construction works - Part 1: Buildings. Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization (ISO), 2010.
[20] Ministry of Environment and Urban Planning, Regulation on Waste Management, Official Journal of Turkish Republic: Ankara, 2015.
[21] Ministry of Environment and Urban Planning, Regulation on Controlling the Packaging Waste, Official Journal of Turkish Republic: Ankara, 2011.
[22] Ministry of Labor and Social Security, Regulation on Dust Control, Official Journal of Turkish Republic: Ankara, 2013.
[23] Ministry of Labor and Social Security, Regulation on the Protection of Workers from the Risks Related to Noise, Official Journal of Turkish Republic: Ankara, 2013.
[24] Ministry of Labor and Social Security, Regulation on the Protection of Workers from the Risks Related to Vibration, Official Journal of Turkish Republic: Ankara, 2013.
[25] T.L. Saaty, The analytic hierarchy process: Planning, priority setting, resource allocation. 2nd ed. Pittsburg: RWS, 1990.
[26] J.J. Buckley, "Fuzzy hierarchical analysis", Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol. 17, 1985, pp. 233–247.
[27] G. Onder, E. Onder, "Analytical Hierarchy Process", in Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods (in Turkish), B.F. Yıldırım, E. Onder, Ed. Bursa: Dora Publishing, 2015, pp. 21–74.
[28] M. Ozdemir, "TOPSIS", in Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods (in Turkish), B.F. Yıldırım, E. Onder, Ed. Bursa: Dora Publishing, 2015, pp. 133–153.