Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 31532
Classroom Incivility Behaviours among Medical Students: A Comparative Study in Pakistan

Authors: Manal Rauf


Trained medical practitioners are produced from medical colleges serving in public and private sectors. Prime responsibility of teaching faculty is to inculcate required work ethic among the students by serving as role models for them. It is an observed fact that classroom incivility behaviours are providing a friction in achieving these targets. Present study aimed at identification of classroom incivility behaviours observed by teachers and students of public and private medical colleges as per Glasser’s Choice Theory, making a comparison and investigating the strategies being adopted by teachers of both sectors to control undesired class room behaviours. Findings revealed that a significant difference occurs between teacher and student incivility behaviours. Public sector teacher focussed on survival as a strong factor behind in civil behaviours whereas private sector teachers considered power as the precedent for incivility. Teachers of both sectors are required to use verbal as well as non-verbal immediacy to reach a healthy leaning environment.

Keywords: Classroom incivility behaviour, Glasser choice theory, Mehrabian immediacy theory, medical student.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI):

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1106


[1] Davis, H. A. (2002). The quality and impact of relationships between elementary school students and teachers. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26(4), 431-453.
[2] Bjorklund, W. L., & Rehling, D. L. (2009). Student perceptions of classroom incivility. College Teaching, 58(1), 15-18.
[3] Marini, Z. A. (2008) The Learning Republic: Fostering Civility in the University Classroom Interview with Dr. Zopito Marini Reflection Newsletter of the Teaching Support Centre, University of Western Ontario.
[4] Clark, C. M. (2008). Student voices on faculty incivility in nursing education: A conceptual model. Nursing Education Perspectives, 29(5), 284-289.
[5] Glasser, W. (2010). Choice theory: A new psychology of personal freedom. Harper Collins.
[6] Roca, K (2007). Student motivation and attitudes: The role of the affective domain in geoscience learning. Retrieved
[7] Chesebro, J.L. and McCroskey, J.C. (2001). The relationship of teacher clarity and immediacy with student state receiver apprehension, affect, and cognitive learning. Communication Education, 50, 59-68.
[8] Carrell, L.J. and Menzel, K.E. (2001). Variations in learning, motivation, and perceived immediacy between live and distance education. Communication Education, 50, 230-241.
[9] Messman, S.J. and Jones-Corley, J. (2001). Effects of communication environment, immediacy, communication apprehension on cognitive and affective learning. Communication Monographs, 68, 184-200.
[10] Nutt, C. M. (2013). Stop the Madness! College Faculty and Student Perceptions of Classroom Incivility.
[11] Kuhlenschmidt, S. L. (1999). Promoting internal civility: Understanding our beliefs about teaching and students. New directions for teaching and learning, 1999(77), 13-22.
[12] Alberts, H. C., Hazen, H. D., & Theobald, R. B. (2010). Classroom incivilities: The challenge of interactions between college students and instructors in the US. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 34(3), 439-462.
[13] Seidman, A. (2005). The learning killer: Disruptive student behavior in the classroom. Reading improvement, 42(1), 40.
[14] McKinne, M., & Martin, B. N. (2010). Higher education faculty and student perceptions of classroom incivility. Journal of College and Character, 11(2).
[15] Linsin, M. (2011). Why freedom is a power classroom management strategy. Retrieved from
[16] Stewart, J.D (2014). Every student needs to feel like they belong. Retrieved from