The Role of Planning and Memory in the Navigational Ability
Authors: Greeshma Sharma, Sushil Chandra, Vijander Singh, Alok Prakash Mittal
Abstract:
Navigational ability requires spatial representation, planning, and memory. It covers three interdependent domains, i.e. cognitive and perceptual factors, neural information processing, and variability in brain microstructure. Many attempts have been made to see the role of spatial representation in the navigational ability, and the individual differences have been identified in the neural substrate. But, there is also a need to address the influence of planning, memory on navigational ability. The present study aims to evaluate relations of aforementioned factors in the navigational ability. Total 30 participants volunteered in the study of a virtual shopping complex and subsequently were classified into good and bad navigators based on their performances. The result showed that planning ability was the most correlated factor for the navigational ability and also the discriminating factor between the good and bad navigators. There was also found the correlations between spatial memory recall and navigational ability. However, non-verbal episodic memory and spatial memory recall were also found to be correlated with the learning variable. This study attempts to identify differences between people with more and less navigational ability on the basis of planning and memory.
Keywords: Memory, planning navigational ability, virtual reality.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1127653
Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1443References:
[1] Siegel, A. W., & White, S. H. (1975). The development of spatial representations of large-scale environments. Advances in child development and behavior, 10, 9-55.
[2] McNaughton, B. L., Battaglia, F. P., Jensen, O., Moser, E. I., & Moser, M. B. (2006). Path integration and the neural basis of the'cognitive map'. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7(8), 663-678.
[3] Hafting, T., Fyhn, M., Molden, S., Moser, M. B., & Moser, E. I. (2005). Microstructure of a spatial map in the entorhinal cortex. Nature, 436(7052), 801-806.
[4] O'keefe, J., & Conway, D. H. (1978). Hippocampal place units in the freely moving rat: why they fire where they fire. Experimental Brain Research, 31(4), 573-590.
[5] Sato, N., Sakata, H., Tanaka, Y. L., & Taira, M. (2006). Navigation-associated medial parietal neurons in monkeys. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103(45), 17001-17006
[6] Wallace, D. G., Gorny, B., & Whishaw, I. Q. (2002). Rats can track odors, other rats, and themselves: implications for the study of spatial behavior. Behavioural brain research, 131(1), 185-192.
[7] Janzen, G., & Van Turennout, M. (2004). Selective neural representation of objects relevant for navigation. Nature neuroscience, 7(6), 673-677.
[8] Schedlbauer, A. M., Copara, M. S., Watrous, A. J., & Ekstrom, A. D. (2014). Multiple interacting brain areas underlie successful spatiotemporal memory retrieval in humans. Scientific reports, 4.
[9] Wegman, J., Tyborowska, A., & Janzen, G. (2014). Encoding and retrieval of landmark‐related spatial cues during navigation: An fMRI study. Hippocampus, 24(7), 853-868.
[10] Buzsáki, G., & Moser, E. I. (2013). Memory, navigation and theta rhythm in the hippocampal-entorhinal system. Nature neuroscience, 16(2), 130-138.
[11] Whitlock, J. R., Sutherland, R. J., Witter, M. P., Moser, M. B., & Moser, E. I. (2008). Navigating from hippocampus to parietal cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(39), 14755-14762
[12] Wilson, B. A., Alderman, N., Burgess, P. W., Emslie, H., & Evans, J. (1996). Behavioural assessment of the dysexecutive syndrome. Thames Valley Test Company.
[13] Benedict, R. H., Schretlen, D., Groninger, L., Dobraski, M., & Shpritz, B. (1996). Revision of the Brief Visuospatial Memory Test: Studies of normal performance, reliability, and validity. Psychological Assessment, 8(2), 145.
[14] Blajenkova, O., Motes, M. A., & Kozhevnikov, M. (2005). Individual differences in the representations of novel environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(1), 97-109.
[15] Gramann, K. (2013). Embodiment of spatial reference frames and individual differences in reference frame proclivity. Spatial Cognition & Computation,13(1), 1-25.
[16] Dabbs, J. M., Chang, E. L., Strong, R. A., & Milun, R. (1998). Spatial ability, navigation strategy, and geographic knowledge among men and women. Evolution and Human Behavior, 19(2), 89-98.
[17] Pak, R., Czaja, S. J., Sharit, J., Rogers, W. A., & Fisk, A. D. (2008). The role of spatial abilities and age in performance in an auditory computer navigation task. Computers in human behavior, 24(6), 3045-3051.