H2 Permeation Properties of a Catalytic Membrane Reactor in Methane Steam Reforming Reaction

Authors: M. Amanipour, J. Towfighi, E. Ganji Babakhani, M. Heidari

Abstract:

Cylindrical alumina microfiltration membrane (GMITM Corporation, inside diameter=9 mm, outside diameter=13 mm, length= 50 mm) with an average pore size of 0.5 micrometer and porosity of about 0.35 was used as the support for membrane reactor. This support was soaked in boehmite sols, and the mean particle size was adjusted in the range of 50 to 500 nm by carefully controlling hydrolysis time, and calcined at 650 °C for two hours. This process was repeated with different boehmite solutions in order to achieve an intermediate layer with an average pore size of about 50 nm. The resulting substrate was then coated with a thin and dense layer of silica by counter current chemical vapour deposition (CVD) method. A boehmite sol with 10 wt.% of nickel which was prepared by a standard procedure was used to make the catalytic layer. BET, SEM, and XRD analysis were used to characterize this layer. The catalytic membrane reactor was placed in an experimental setup to evaluate the permeation and hydrogen separation performance for a steam reforming reaction. The setup consisted of a tubular module in which the membrane was fixed, and the reforming reaction occurred at the inner side of the membrane. Methane stream, diluted with nitrogen, and deionized water with a steam to carbon (S/C) ratio of 3.0 entered the reactor after the reactor was heated up to 500 °C with a specified rate of 2 °C/ min and the catalytic layer was reduced at presence of hydrogen for 2.5 hours. Nitrogen flow was used as sweep gas through the outer side of the reactor. Any liquid produced was trapped and separated at reactor exit by a cold trap, and the produced gases were analyzed by an on-line gas chromatograph (Agilent 7890A) to measure total CH₄ conversion and H₂ permeation. BET analysis indicated uniform size distribution for catalyst with average pore size of 280 nm and average surface area of 275 m².g^-1. Single-component permeation tests were carried out for hydrogen, methane, and carbon dioxide at temperature range of 500-800 °C, and the results showed almost the same permeance and hydrogen selectivity values for hydrogen as the composite membrane without catalytic layer. Performance of the catalytic membrane was evaluated by applying membranes as a membrane reactor for methane steam reforming reaction at gas hourly space velocity (GHSV) of 10,000 h⁻¹ and 2 bar. CH₄ conversion increased from 50% to 85% with increasing reaction temperature from 600 °C to 750 °C, which is sufficiently above equilibrium curve at reaction conditions, but slightly lower than membrane reactor with packed nickel catalytic bed because of its higher surface area compared to the catalytic layer.

Keywords: Catalytic membrane, hydrogen, methane steam reforming, permeance.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1127543

References:

[1] T. Tsuru, H. Shintani, M. Asaeda, “A bimodal catalytic membrane having a hydrogen-permselective silica layer on a bimodal catalytic support: Preparation and application to the steam reforming of methane”, In Appl. Catal. A, vol 302, 2006, pp. 78–85.
[2] S. Araki, N. Mohri, “Synthesis, characterization and gas permeation properties of a silica membrane prepared by high-pressure chemical vapor deposition”, In J Membr Sci., vol 290, 2007, pp. 138–145.
[3] T. Kumea, Y. Ikedaa, T. Isekia T, H. Yakabea, M. Ito, “Performance evaluation of membrane on catalyst module for hydrogen production from natural gas”, In Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, vol 38, 2013, pp. 6079–6084.
[4] Y. Shirasakia, T. Tsunekia, “Development of membrane reformer system for highly efficient hydrogen production from natural gas”. In Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, vol 34, 2009, pp. 4482–4487.
[5] M. Heidari, A. Zamaniyan, A. Safe Kordi, E. Ganji Babakhani, M. Amanipour, “Effect of Sintering Temperature on Microstructure and Hydrogen Permeation Properties of Perovskite Membrane”, In J. Mater. Sci. Technol., vol. 29, 2013, pp. 137–141.
[6] S. Uemiya, N. Sato, H. Ando, T. Matsuda, E. Kikuchi, “Steam reforming of methane in a hydrogen-permeable membrane reactor”, In Appl. Catal., vol. 67, 1991, pp. 223–230.
[7] W. Yu, T. Ohmori, T. Yamamato, A. Endo, “Simulation of porous ceramic membrane reactor for hydrogen production.” In Int. J. Hydrogen. Energy, vol. 30, 2005, pp. 1071–1079.
[8] M. Amanipour, J. Towfighi, A. Zamaniyan, E. Ganji Babakhani, M. Heidari, “Performance of a nickel–alumina catalytic layer for simultaneous production and purification of hydrogen in a tubular membrane reactor”, In RSC Advances, vol. 6, 2016, pp. 75686–75692.
[9] R.W. Spillman, “Economics of gas separation membranes”, In Chem. Eng. Prog., vol. 85, 1989, pp. 41–62.
[10] S. Adhikari, S. Fernando, “Hydrogen membrane separation techniques”, In Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., vol. 45, 2006, pp. 875–881.
[11] R. S. A. De Lange, K. Keizer, A. J. Burggraaf, “Analysis and theory of gas transport in microporous sol-gel derived ceramic membranes”, In J. Membr Sci., vol. 104, 1995, pp. 81–100.
[12] H. M. Alsyouri, C. Langheinrich, Y. S. Lin, Z. B. Ye, S. P. Zhu, “Cyclic CVD modification of straight pore alumina membranes”, In Langmuir, vol. 19, 2003, pp. 307–7314.
[13] M. Asaeda, M. Kanezashi, T. Yoshioka, T. Tsuru, “Gas permeation characteristics and stability of composite silica-metal oxide membranes.” In MRS Fall Meeting, Boston, 2002, pp. 50-55.
[14] S. Battersby, S. Smart, B. Ladewig, S. Liu, M.C. Duke, V. Rudolph, J.C. Dinizda Costa, “Hydrothermal stability of cobalt silica membranes in a water gas shift membrane reactor.” In Separ. and Purific.. Tech., vol. 66, 2009, pp. 299–305.
[15] M. Amanipour, E. Ganji Babakhani, A. Safekordi, A. Zamaniyan, M. Heidari, “Effect of CVD parameters on hydrogen permeation properties in a nano-composite SiO2–Al2O3 membrane”, In J. Membr. Sci., vol. 423–424, 2012, pp. 530–535.
[16] A. Jabbari, K. Ghasemzadeh, P. Khajavi, F. Assa, M. A. Abdi, A. A. Babaluo, A. Basile, “Surface modification of α-alumina support in synthesis of silica membrane for hydrogen purification.” In Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, vol. 39, 2014, 18585-18591.
[17] Y. Gu, S. T. Oyama, “Permeation properties and hydrothermal stability of silica–titania membranes supported on porous alumina substrates”, In J. Membr. Sci., vol. 345, 2009, pp. 267–275.
[18] M. E.E. Abashar, “Coupling of steam and dry reforming of methane in catalytic fluidized bed membrane reactors”, In Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, vol. 29, 2004, pp. 799–808.