Normalizing Logarithms of Realized Volatility in an ARFIMA Model
Authors: G. L. C. Yap
Modelling realized volatility with high-frequency returns is popular as it is an unbiased and efficient estimator of return volatility. A computationally simple model is fitting the logarithms of the realized volatilities with a fractionally integrated long-memory Gaussian process. The Gaussianity assumption simplifies the parameter estimation using the Whittle approximation. Nonetheless, this assumption may not be met in the finite samples and there may be a need to normalize the financial series. Based on the empirical indices S&P500 and DAX, this paper examines the performance of the linear volatility model pre-treated with normalization compared to its existing counterpart. The empirical results show that by including normalization as a pre-treatment procedure, the forecast performance outperforms the existing model in terms of statistical and economic evaluations.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1127474Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 811
 S. J. Koopman, B. Jungbacker, and E. Hol, “Forecasting daily variability of the S&P100 stock index using historical, realised and implied volatility measurements,” J. Empir. Financ., vol. 12, pp. 445–475, 2005.
 M. Martens, D. Dijk, and M. Pooter, “Forecasting S&P 500 volatility: long memory, level shifts, leverage effects, day of the week seasonality and macroeconomic announcements,” Int. J. Forecast., vol. 25, pp. 282–303, 2009.
 M. Martens, “Measuring and forecasting S&P 500 index-futures volatility using high-frequency data,” J. Futur. Mark., vol. 22, pp. 497–518, 2002.
 T. G. Andersen, T. Bollerslev, F. X. Diebold, and H. Ebens, “The distribution of realized stock returns volatility,” J. financ. econ., vol. 6, pp. 43–76, 2001.
 T. G. Andersen, T. Bollerslev, F. X. Diebold, and P. Labys, “Modeling and forecasting realized volatility,” Econometrica, vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 579–625, 2003.
 P. Brockwell and R. Davis, Time Series: Theory and Methods, 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer, 1996.
 J. W. Cooley and J. W. Tukey, “An algorithm for the machine calculation of complex Fourier series,” Math. Comput., vol. 19, pp. 297–301, 1965.
 E. J. Hannan, “Central limit theorems for time series regression,” Zeitschrift fur Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie und Verwandte Gebiete, vol. 26, pp. 157–170, 1973.
 N. H. Chan and W. Palma, “Estimation of long-memory time series models: A survey of different likelihood-based methods,” Econom. Anal. Financ. Econ. Time Ser. B, vol. 20, pp. 89–121, 2006.
 M. Narukawa, “Semiparametric Whittle estimation of a cyclical long-memory time series based on generalised exponential models,” J. Nonparametr. Stat., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 272–295, 2016.
 S. Bivona, G. Bonanno, R. Burlon, D. Gurrera, and C. Leone, “Stochastic models for wind speed forecasting,” Energy Convers. Manag., vol. 52, pp. 1157–1165, 2011.
 P. R. Hansen, “A test for superior predictive ability,” J. Bus. Econ. Stat., vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 365–380, 2005.
 J. Barunik and T. Krehlik, “Combining high frequency data with non-linear models for forecasting energy market volatility,” Expert Syst. with Appl., vol. 55, pp. 222–242, 2016.
 P. Giot and S. Laurent, “Modeling daily value-at-risk using realized volatility and ARCH type models,” J. Empir. Financ., vol. 11, pp. 379–398, 2004.
 D. P. Louzis, S. Xanthopoulos-Sisinis, and A. P. Refenes, “Realized volatility models and alternative Value-at-risk prediction strategies,” Econ. Model., vol. 40, pp. 101–116, 2014.
 R. Dahlhaus, “Efficient parameter estimation for self-similar processes,” Ann. Stat., vol. 17, pp. 1749–1766, 1989.
 R. Fox and M. S. Taqqu, “Large sample propertiew of parameter estimates for strongly dependent stationary Gaussian time series,” Ann. Stat., vol. 14, pp. 517–532, 1986.
 N. Demiris, D. Lunn, and L. D. Sharples, “Survival extrapolation using the poly-Weibull model,” Stat. Methods Med. Res., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 287–301, 2015.
 S. H. Feizjavadian and R. Hashemi, “Analysis of dependent competing risks in the presence of progressive hybrid censoring using Marshall-Olkin bivariate Weibull distribution,” Comput. Stat. Data Anal., vol. 82, pp. 19–34, 2015.
 N. Balakrishnan and M. H. Ling, “Best Constant-Stress Accelerated Life-Test Plans With Multiple Stress Factors for One-Shot Device Testing Under a Weibull Distribution,” IEEE Trans. Reliab., vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 944–952, 2014.
 P. Abad, S. B. Muela, and C. L. Martin, “The role of the loss function in value-at-risk comparisons,” J. Risk Model Valid., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–19, 2015.
 D. N. Politis and J. P. Romano, “The stationary bootstrap,” J. Am. Stat. Assoc., vol. 89, no. 428, pp. 1303–1313, 1994.