An Investigation of the Relationship between the Need for Cognitive Closure and Religious Fundamentalism
There are positive significant relationships between the Need for Cognitive Closure (NFC) and Religious Fundamentalism (RF) among students. The preliminary assumption of the current study was: There would be a stronger pattern of association between these constructs, if the participants of the study are more exposed to the study's main concept which is religiosity. In other words, close-mindedness would be more related to homogeneous samples of practicing devotees of monotheistic religions compared to student samples. The main hypothesis was that concerning the Muslim sample, there will be a significant and positive correlation between the need for closure (and all facets of it, except decisiveness) and RF. Both the student sample (n=88), and the Muslim practicing mosque attending sample (n=40), were administrated three scales of Need for Closure (NFCS), Religious Fundamentalism (RFS), and Four Basic Dimensions of Religiousness (FBDRS). The results of the study moderately confirmed the hypothesis and showed a positive correlation between NFCS and RFS with the Muslim sample. Specifically, preference for order, preference for predictability and discomfort with ambiguity facets of the NFCS positively correlated with RFS. However, with regards to the student sample such relationships between the constructs were not found.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1127298Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1057
 V. Saroglou, Beyond dogmatism: The need for closure as related to religion. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 5(2), 2002, pp. 183-194.
 V. Saroglou, Religiousness, religious fundamentalism, and quest as predictors of humor creation. The international journal for the psychology of religion, 12(3), 2002, pp. 177-188.
 V. Saroglou, & A. B. Cohen, Cultural and cross-cultural psychology of religion. In R. F. Paloutzian & C. L. Park (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality (2nd ed., 2013, pp. 330-354). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
 V., Saroglou, & J. Dupuis, Being Buddhist in Western Europe: Cognitive needs, prosocial character, and values. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 16, 2006, pp. 163-179.
 B. Altemeyer, & B. Hunsberger, Authoritarianism, religious fundamentalism, quest,and prejudice, International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 2, 1992, pp. 113–133.
 B. Altemeyer, The mirror-image in US-Soviet perceptions: Recent cross-national authoritarianism research. In annual meeting of the International Society of Political Psychology convention (julio). Washington, DC 1990.
 B., Altemeyer, & B. Hunsberger, Research: A revised religious fundamentalism scale: The short and sweet of it. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 14(1), 2004, pp. 47-54.
 M. J., Brandt, & C. Renya, The role of prejudice and the need for closure in religious fundamentalism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 2010, pp.715-725.
 N. J. Delong-Bas, Wahhabi Islam: From revival and reform to global jihad. Oxford University Press, 2004.
 B. Duriez, Vivisecting the religious mind: Religiosity and motivated social cognition. Mental Health, Religion, and Culture, 6, 2003, pp. 79-86.
 L. W. Galen, Does religious belief promote prosociality? A critical examination. Psychological bulletin, 138(5), 2012, pp. 876.
 P. Harvey, An introduction to Buddhism: Teachings, history, and practices. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
 L. M., Jackson, & B. Hunsberger, An intergroup perspective on religion and prejudice. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 1999, pp. 509-523.
 A.W., Kruglanski, D.M. Webster, & A. Klem, Motivated resistance and openness to persuasion in the presence or absence of prior information, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1993. Pp. 861–876.
 A., Pierro, L., Mannetti, E., De Grada, S., Livi, & A. W. Kruglanski, Autocracy bias in informal groups under need for closure. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(3), 2003, pp. 405-417.
 A., Roets, & A.Van Hiel, Need for closure relations with authoritarianism, conservative beliefs and racism: The impact of urgency and permanence tendencies. Psychologica Belgica, 46(3), 2006, pp. 235-252.
 J. Y., Sasaki, & H. S. Kim, At the intersection of culture and religion: A cultural analysis of religion’s implications for secondary control and social affiliation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 2011, pp. 401-414.
 R. A. Segal, (Ed.). The Blackwell companion to the study of religion (Vol. 21). John Wiley & Sons, 2009.
 R. Stark, Gods, rituals, and the moral order. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 40, 2001, pp. 619-636.
 A., Van Hiel, M., Pandelaere, & B. Duriez, The impact of need for closure on conservative beliefs and racism: Differential mediation by authoritarian submission and authoritarian dominance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(7), 2004. Pp.824-837.
 D. M., Webster, & A. W. Kruglanski, Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. Journal of personality and social psychology, 67(6), 1994, pp. 1049.
 D.M. Webster, & A.W. Kruglanski, Cognitive and social consequences of the need for cognitive closure, European Review of Social Psychology, 8, 1998, pp. 133–173.
 A. Harrington, (Ed.). Visions of compassion: Western scientists and Tibetan Buddhists examine human nature, 2002, pp. 107-130). New York: Oxford University Press.
 H. C. Trandis, Collectivism vs. individualism: a reconceptualization of a basic concept in cross-cultural psychology Edited by: Verma GK, Bagley C. In Nerbraska Symposium on Motivation, University of Nebraska Press (1988).