Identifying and Analyzing the Role of Brand Loyalty towards Incumbent Smartphones in New Branded Smartphone Adoption: Approach by Dual Process Theory
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32771
Identifying and Analyzing the Role of Brand Loyalty towards Incumbent Smartphones in New Branded Smartphone Adoption: Approach by Dual Process Theory

Authors: Lee Woong-Kyu

Abstract:

Fierce competition in smartphone market may encourage users to switch brands when buying a new smartphone. However, many smartphone users continue to use the same brand although other branded smartphones are perceived to be more attractive. The purpose of this study is to identify and analyze the effects of brand loyalty toward incumbent smartphone on new smartphone adoption. For this purpose, a research model including two hypotheses, the positive effect on rational judgments and the negative effect on rational judgments, are proposed based on the dual process theory. For the validation of the research model, the data was collected by surveying Korean university students and tested by the group comparison between high and low brand loyalty. The results show that the two hypotheses were statistically supported.

Keywords: Brand loyalty, dual process theory, incumbent smartphone, smartphone adoption.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1127188

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1586

References:


[1] Z. Epstein, “Apple Continues to crush Samsung where it Matters Most”, BGR, Jun 29, 2015, (http://bgr.com/2015/06/29/apple-vs-samsung-brand-loyalty-survey-rbc/).
[2] H. Assael, Consumer Behavior and Marketing Action, 6th edition, South-Western College Publishing, 1998.
[3] J. C. Dvorak, “Should We Consider the Smartphone a Computer?”, PC Magazine, December 4, 2012.
[4] H. Chun, H. Lee, and D. Kim, “The Integrative Model of Smartphone Adoption: Hedonic and Utilitarian Values Perceptions of Smartphones among Korean College Students”, Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, vol. 15, no. 9, pp. 474-479, 2012.
[5] S. H. Kim, “Moderating effects of Job Relevance and Experience on Mobile Wireless Technology Acceptance: Adoption of a Smartphone by Individuals”, Information & Management, vol. 45, no. 6, pp.387-393, 2008.
[6] J. Joo and Y. Sang, “Exploring Korean Smartphone Usage: an Integrative Model of the Technology Acceptance Model and Uses and Gratification Theory”, Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 29, pp. 2512-2518, 2013.
[7] D-H. Shin, Y-J. Shin, H. Choo, and K. Beom, “Smartphones as Smart Pedagogical Tools: Implications for Smartphones as u-Learning Devices”, Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 27, pp. 2207~2214, 2011.
[8] F. D. Davis, “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology”, MIS Quarterly, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 319-340, 1989.
[9] F. D. Davis, R. P. Bagozzi, and P. R. Warshaw, “User Acceptance of Computer Technology: a Comparison of Two Theoretical Models”, Management Science, vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 982-1003, 1989.
[10] W. B. Dodds, K. B. Monroe, and D. Grewal, “Effects of Price, Brand, and Store Information on Buyers”, Journal of Marketing Research, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 307-319, 1991.
[11] V. Venkatesh, J. Y. L. Thong, and X. Xu, “Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology”, MIS Quarterly, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 157-178, 2012.
[12] W-K. Lee, “A Framework for Purchase Intentions toward a Brand-New Smartphone based on Self-Presentation and Aesthetics”, Asia Pacific Journal of Information Systems, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 515-529, 2014.
[13] C. Tynan, S. McKechnie, and C. Chhuon, “Co-Creating Value for Luxury Brands”, Journal of Business Research, vol. 63, pp. 1156~1163, 2010.
[14] R-C. Tzou and H-P. Lu, “Exploring the Emotional, Aesthetic, and Ergonomic Facets of Innovative Product on Fashion Technology Acceptance Model”, Behaviour & Information Technology, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 311~322, 2009.
[15] K. E. Stanovich, Rationality and the Reflective Mind, Oxford University Press, 2010.
[16] K. E. Stanovoch and J. B. T. Evans, (2013) “Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition: Advancing the Debate”, Perspective of Psychological Science, vol.8, no. 3, pp. 223-241, 2013.
[17] D. A. Norman, Emotional Design: Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things, Basic Books, New York, 2004.
[18] N. Tractinsky, “Toward the Study of Aesthetics in Information Technology”, In Proceedings of Twenty-Fifth International Conference on Information Systems, pp. 11~20, 2004.
[19] D. Lee, D., J. Moon, Y. J. Kim, and M. Y. Yi, “Antecedents and Consequences of Mobile Phone Usability: Linking Simplicity and Interactivity to Satisfaction, Trust, and Brand Loyalty”, Information & Management, vol. 5, pp. 295-304, 2015.
[20] C-H. Yeh, Y-S. Wang, and K. Yieh, “Predicting Smartphone Brand Loyalty: Consumer Value and Consumer-Brand Identification Perspectives”, International Journal of Information Management, vol. 36, pp. 245-257, 2016.