Commenced in January 2007
Paper Count: 30831
A Spatial Hypergraph Based Semi-Supervised Band Selection Method for Hyperspectral Imagery Semantic Interpretation
Abstract:Hyperspectral imagery (HSI) typically provides a wealth of information captured in a wide range of the electromagnetic spectrum for each pixel in the image. Hence, a pixel in HSI is a high-dimensional vector of intensities with a large spectral range and a high spectral resolution. Therefore, the semantic interpretation is a challenging task of HSI analysis. We focused in this paper on object classification as HSI semantic interpretation. However, HSI classification still faces some issues, among which are the following: The spatial variability of spectral signatures, the high number of spectral bands, and the high cost of true sample labeling. Therefore, the high number of spectral bands and the low number of training samples pose the problem of the curse of dimensionality. In order to resolve this problem, we propose to introduce the process of dimensionality reduction trying to improve the classification of HSI. The presented approach is a semi-supervised band selection method based on spatial hypergraph embedding model to represent higher order relationships with different weights of the spatial neighbors corresponding to the centroid of pixel. This semi-supervised band selection has been developed to select useful bands for object classification. The presented approach is evaluated on AVIRIS and ROSIS HSIs and compared to other dimensionality reduction methods. The experimental results demonstrate the efficacy of our approach compared to many existing dimensionality reduction methods for HSI classification.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1127070Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 909
 A. Radoi, R. Tanase, and M. Datcu, “Semantic interpretation of multi-level change detection in multi-temporal satellite images,” in Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), 2015 IEEE International. IEEE, 2015, pp. 4157–4160.
 M. Ivasic-Kos, M. Pavlic, and P. Poscic, “The analysis and overview of semantic image interpretation,” in Information Technology Interfaces, 2009. ITI’09. Proceedings of the ITI 2009 31st International Conference on. IEEE, 2009, pp. 181–186.
 G. T. Papadopoulos, C. Saathoff, M. Grzegorzek, V. Mezaris, I. Kompatsiaris, S. Staab, and M. G. Strintzis, “Comparative evaluation of spatial context techniques for semantic image analysis,” in Image Analysis for Multimedia Interactive Services, 2009. WIAMIS’09. 10th Workshop on. IEEE, 2009, pp. 161–164.
 C. Hudelot, N. Maillot, and M. Thonnat, “Symbol grounding for semantic image interpretation: from image data to semantics,” in Computer Vision Workshops, 2005. ICCVW’05. Tenth IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 2005, pp. 1875–1875.
 M. Ivaˇsi´c-Kos, M. Pavli´c, and M. Mateti´c, “Data preparation for semantic image interpretation,” in Information Technology Interfaces (ITI), 2010 32nd International Conference on. IEEE, 2010, pp. 181–186.
 S. Chen and D. Zhang, “Semisupervised dimensionality reduction with pairwise constraints for hyperspectral image classification,” Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, IEEE, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 369–373, 2011.
 H. Huang and M. Yang, “Dimensionality reduction of hyperspectral images with sparse discriminant embedding,” Geoscience and Remote Sensing, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 53, no. 9, pp. 5160–5169, 2015.
 H. Huang, J. Li, and J. Liu, “Enhanced semi-supervised local fisher discriminant analysis for face recognition,” Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 244–253, 2012.
 W. Li, S. Prasad, J. E. Fowler, and L. M. Bruce, “Locality-preserving dimensionality reduction and classification for hyperspectral image analysis,” Geoscience and Remote Sensing, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 1185–1198, 2012.
 J. Khoder, R. Younes, and F. B. Ouezdou, “Stability of dimensionality reduction methods applied on artificial hyperspectral images,” in Computer Vision and Graphics. Springer, 2012, pp. 465–474.
 B.-C. Kuo, C.-H. Li, and J.-M. Yang, “Kernel nonparametric weighted feature extraction for hyperspectral image classification,” Geoscience and Remote Sensing, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 1139–1155, 2009.
 J. Feng, L. Jiao, F. Liu, T. Sun, and X. Zhang, “Unsupervised feature selection based on maximum information and minimum redundancy for hyperspectral images,” Pattern Recognition, vol. 51, pp. 295–309, 2016.
 J. M. Sotoca and F. Pla, “Supervised feature selection by clustering using conditional mutual information-based distances,” Pattern Recognition, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 2068–2081, 2010.
 B. Guo, R. I. Damper, S. R. Gunn, and J. D. Nelson, “A fast separability-based feature-selection method for high-dimensional remotely sensed image classification,” Pattern Recognition, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 1653–1662, 2008.
 L. Zhang, C. Chen, J. Bu, and X. He, “A unified feature and instance selection framework using optimum experimental design,” Image Processing, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 2379–2388, 2012.
 C.-I. Chang and S. Wang, “Constrained band selection for hyperspectral imagery,” Geoscience and Remote Sensing, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 1575–1585, 2006.
 S. B. Kim and P. Rattakorn, “Unsupervised feature selection using weighted principal components,” Expert systems with applications, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 5704–5710, 2011.
 W. Jian, “Unsupervised intrusion feature selection based on genetic algorithm and fcm,” in Information Engineering and Applications. Springer, 2012, pp. 1005–1012.
 M. Breaban and H. Luchian, “A unifying criterion for unsupervised clustering and feature selection,” Pattern Recognition, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 854–865, 2011.
 M. Sugiyama, “Dimensionality reduction of multimodal labeled data by local fisher discriminant analysis,” The Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 8, pp. 1027–1061, 2007.
 P. Deepa and K. Thilagavathi, “Feature extraction of hyperspectral image using principal component analysis and folded-principal component analysis,” in Electronics and Communication Systems (ICECS), 2015 2nd International Conference on. IEEE, 2015, pp. 656–660.
 L. Ding, P. Tang, and H. Li, “Isomap-based subspace analysis for the classification of hyperspectral data,” in Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), 2013 IEEE International. IEEE, 2013, pp. 429–432.
 S. Yan, D. Xu, B. Zhang, H.-J. Zhang, Q. Yang, and S. Lin, “Graph embedding and extensions: a general framework for dimensionality reduction,” Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 40–51, 2007.
 C. Berge and E. Minieka, Graphs and hypergraphs. North-Holland publishing company Amsterdam, 1973, vol. 7.
 Y. Huang, Q. Liu, S. Zhang, and D. N. Metaxas, “Image retrieval via probabilistic hypergraph ranking,” in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2010 IEEE Conference on. IEEE, 2010, pp. 3376–3383.
 R. Ji, Y. Gao, R. Hong, Q. Liu, D. Tao, and X. Li, “Spectral-spatial constraint hyperspectral image classification,” Geoscience and Remote Sensing, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 1811–1824, 2014.
 H. Yuan and Y. Y. Tang, “Learning with hypergraph for hyperspectral image feature extraction,” Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, IEEE, vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 1695–1699, 2015.
 A. Soltani-Farani, H. R. Rabiee, and S. A. Hosseini, “Spatial-aware dictionary learning for hyperspectral image classification,” Geoscience and Remote Sensing, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 527–541, 2015.
 F. Nie, S. Xiang, Y. Liu, and C. Zhang, “A general graph-based semi-supervised learning with novel class discovery,” Neural Computing and Applications, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 549–555, 2010.
 P. Mitra, C. Murthy, and S. K. Pal, “Unsupervised feature selection using feature similarity,” IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 301–312, 2002.