Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32799
Effects of Corruption and Logistics Performance Inefficiencies on Container Throughput: The Latin America Case
Authors: Fernando Seabra, Giulia P. Flores, Karolina C. Gomes
Abstract:
Trade liberalizations measures, as import tariff cuts, are not a sufficient trigger for trade growth. Given that price margins are narrow, traders and cargo operators tend to opt out of markets where the process of goods clearance is slow and costly. Excess paperwork and slow customs dispatch not only lead to institutional breakdowns and corruption but also to increasing transaction cost and trade constraints. The objective of this paper is, therefore, two-fold: First, to evaluate the relationship between institutional and infrastructural performance indexes and trade growth in container throughput; and, second, to investigate the causes for differences in container demurrage and detention fees in Latin American countries (using other emerging countries as benchmarking). The analysis is focused on manufactured goods, typically transported by containers. Institutional and infrastructure bottlenecks and, therefore, the country logistics efficiency – measured by the Logistics Performance Index (LPI, World Bank-WB) – are compared with other indexes, such as the Doing Business index (WB) and the Corruption Perception Index (Transparency International). The main results based on the comparison between Latin American countries and the others emerging countries point out in that the growth in containers trade is directly related to LPI performance. It has also been found that the main hypothesis is valid as aspects that more specifically identify trade facilitation and corruption are significant drivers of logistics performance. The exam of port efficiency (demurrage and detention fees) has demonstrated that not necessarily higher level of efficiency is related to lower charges; however, reductions in fees have been more significant within non-Latin American emerging countries.Keywords: Container throughput, logistics performance, corruption, Latin America.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1339502
Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1519References:
[1] Strange, S. The Retreat of the State: The diffusion of power in the world economy. Cambridge Studies University Press. Nova York, 1996.
[2] Kunaka, C. Trade Dimensions of Logistics Services: A Proposal for Trade Agreements. Policy Research Working Paper. World Bank, 2013.
[3] OCDE. OECD Trade Facilitation Indicators. (n.\d.). Available at:
[4] Doing Business. Trade Across Borders. 2012.
[5] Guner, S.; Coskun, E. Comparison of impacts of economic and social factors on countries’ logistics performances: a study with 26 OECD countries. Poznan University of Technology, 29 October 2012. Vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 329-343. ISSN 2083-4950 (Online). Available at:
[6] United States International Trade Commission. Trade Facilitation in the East African Community: Recent Developments and Potential Benefits. Investigation No. 332-530. Publication 4335. Washington, DC, July 2012.
[7] Gonzalez, Julio A.; Guasch, Jose L.; Serebrisky, Tomas. Improving Logistics Costs for Transportation and Trade Facilitation. The World Bank, Latin America and Caribbean Region Sustainable Development Department. Policy Research Working Paper 4558. March 2008.
[8] European Commission. Trade Facilitation. Taxation and customs Union. (n./d.). Available in:
[9] OECD. OECD Trade Facilitation Indicators. (n./d.). Available at:
[10] Mishra, Ajit. The Economics of Corruption, 2005: Oxford University Press.
[11] Mankiw, N. Gregory (1985). Small Menu Costs and Large Business Cycles: A Macroeconomic Model of Monopoly. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 100 (2): 529–538.
[12] Ahmad, Eatzaz; Ullah, Muhammad Aman; Arfeen, Muhammadirfanullah. Does corruption affect economic growth?. Lat. Am. J. Econ. vol.49 no.2 Santiago nov. 2012.
[13] The World Bank. International LPI. (s./d.). Available at:
[14] Anson, Jose; Cadot, Olivier; Olarreaga, Marcelo. Tariff Evasion and Customs Corruption: Does Pre-Shipment Inspection Help?. Policy Research Working Papers. October 2003. Available at:
[15] Estadão. Scanners na fiscalização de cargas no Porto de Santos. 01 Janeiro 2016. Available at: <(https://portogente.com.br/portopedia/78481-scanners-na-fiscalizacao-de-cargas-no-porto-de-santos>. Access in: June 2016.
[16] Transparency International. Corruption Perceptions Index 2015. Available at:
[17] Transparency International. Short Methodology Note. 2015. (Data and Methodology). Available at:
[18] Transparency International. Anti-Corruption Glossary. (s./d.). Available at:
[19] Michael, Bryane; Ferguson, Frank and Karimov, Alisher. Do Customs Trade Facilitation Programmes Help Reduce Customs-Related Corruption? (October 9, 2010). International Journal of Public Administration 35(2). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1705904 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1705904
[20] Estadão. Procuradoria acusa de corrupção auditor da receita no Porto de Santos. Macedo, Fausto. 2014, July 3rd. Available at:
[21] The World Bank. Doing Business. About Doing Business. 2016. Available at:
[22] The World Bank. Doing Business. Distance to Frontier. 2016. Available at:
[23] The World Bank. Doing Business. Trading Across Borders Methodology. 2016. Available at:
[24] World Shipping Council. Ports. World Port Rankings, “Top 100 ports in the world in 2014”. 2015. Available at:
[26] The World Bank. International LPI Global Ranking. (n./d). Available at:
[27] The World Bank. GDP (current US$). (n./d). Available at:
[28] The World Bank. Doing Business Rankings. (n./d.). Available at:
[29] CMA CGM. Demurrage and Detention Tariffs. (n./d.). Available at: