Relationship-Centred Care in Cross-Linguistic Medical Encounters
Authors: Nami Matsumoto
This study explores the experiences of cross-linguistic medical encounters by patients, and their views of receiving language support therein, with a particular focus on Japanese-English cases. The aim of this study is to investigate the reason for the frequent use of a spouse as a communication mediator from a Japanese perspective, through a comparison with that of English speakers. This study conducts an empirical qualitative analysis of the accounts of informants. A total of 31 informants who have experienced Japanese-English cross-linguistic medical encounters were recruited in Australia and Japan for semi-structured in-depth interviews. A breakdown of informants is 15 English speakers and 16 Japanese speakers. In order to obtain a further insight into collected data, additional interviews were held with 4 Australian doctors who are familiar with using interpreters. This study was approved by the Australian National University Human Research Ethics Committee, and written consent to participate in this study was obtained from all participants. The interviews lasted up to over one hour. They were audio-recorded and subsequently transcribed by the author. Japanese transcriptions were translated into English by the author. An analysis of interview data found that patients value relationship in communication. Particularly, Japanese informants, who have an English-speaking spouse, value trust-based communication interventions by their spouse, regardless of the language proficiency of the spouse. In Australia, health care interpreters are required to abide by the national code of ethics for interpreters. The Code defines the role of an interpreter exclusively to be language rendition and enshrines the tenets of accuracy, confidentiality and professional role boundaries. However, the analysis found that an interpreter who strictly complies with the Code sometimes fails to render the real intentions of the patient and their doctor. Findings from the study suggest that an interpreter should not be detached from the context and should be more engaged in the needs of patients. Their needs are not always communicated by an interpreter when they simply follow a professional code of ethics. The concept of relationship-centred care should be incorporated in the professional practice of health care interpreters.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1126876Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 827
 C. Brough, Language Services in Victoria’s Health System: Perspectives of Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Consumers, Melbourne: Centre for Culture Ethnicity & Health, 2006.
 G. Flores, M. B. Laws, S. J. Mayo, B. Zuckerman, M. Abreu, L. Medina, “Errors in Medical Interpretation and Their Potential Clinical Consequences in Pediatric Encounters,” in Pediatrics, vol. 111, no. 1, pp. 6-14, Jan. 2003.
 E. A. Jacobs, D. S. Lauderdale, D. Meltzer, J. M. Shorey, W. Levinson, and R. A. Thisted, “Impact of interpreter services on delivery of health care to limited-English-proficient patients,” in J. Gen. Intern. Med., vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 468-474, Jul. 2001.
 N. Atkin, “Getting the message across-professional interpreters in general practice,” in Australian Family Physician, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 174-176, Mar. 2008.
 C. Phillips, and J. Travaglia, “Low levels of uptake of free interpreters by Australian doctors in private practice: secondary analysis of national data,” Australian Health Review, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 475-479, Nov. 2011.
 B. Gray, J. Hilder, and H. Donaldson, “Why Do We Not Use Trained Interpreters for All Patients with Limited English Proficiency? Is There a Place for Using Family Members?,” Australian Journal of Primary Health, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 240-249, Sep. 2011.
 ACT Government, Procedure: Language Services – Interpreters, Canberra: ACT Government, 2015. Available at: http://www.health.act.gov.au/sites/default/files//Policy_and_Plan/Language%20Services%20Interpreters%20Procedure.docx (Accessed on December 18, 2015).
 NSW Health Care Interpreter Services, Interpreting in healthcare: Guidelines for interpreters, Sydney: NSW Government, 2014. Available at: http://www.wslhd.health.nsw.gov.au/Health-Care-Interpreter-Service-/HCIS-Publications (Accessed on June 7, 2015).
 Queensland Health 2007, Working with Interpreters: Guidelines, Brisbane: Queensland Government, 2007. Available at: https://www.health.qld.gov.au/multicultural/interpreters/guidelines_int.pdf (Accessed on February 13, 2016).
 Government of Western Australia, Language Services Policy, Perth: Government of Western Australia, 2009. Available at: http://www.department.dotag.wa.gov.au/_files/language_services_policy.pdf (Accessed on March 11, 2013).
 The Royal Australian College of General Practice 2010, Standards for General Practice, East Melbourne: The Royal Australian College of General Practice, 2010. Available at: http://www.racgp.org.au/standards/123 (Accessed on May 9, 2013).
 Victorian Government Department of Human Services 2005, “Automatic equalization for digital communication,” Language Services Policy, Melbourne: Victorian Government Department of Human Services, 2005. Available at: http://www.dhs.vic.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/594926/language_service_policy.pdf (Accessed on February 28, 2012).
 G. Juckett, “Cross-cultural medicine,” in Am. Fam. Physician, vol. 72, no. 11, pp. 2267-2274, Dec. 2005.
 L. S. Karliner, E. A. Jacobs, A. H. Chen, and S. Mutha, “Do Professional Interpreters Improve Clinical Care?,” in Health Serv. Res, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 727-754.
 M. Youdelman, “The Development of Certification for Healthcare Interpreters in the United States,” in Translation & Interpreting, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 114-126, 2013.
 PASS International, “Is the Use of Interpreters in Medical Consultation Justified?: A Critical Review of the Literature ,” Tessenderlo: PASS International 2008. Available at http://www.wrha.mb.ca/professionals/language/files/Article-MedicalConsult.pdf (Accessed on August 30, 2013).
 N. Gill, R. Rotter, A. Burridge, J. Allsopp, and M. Griffiths, “Linguistic Incomprehension in British Asylum Appeal Hearings,” in Anthropol. Today, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 18-21, April 2016.
 J. Green, C. Free, and V. Bhavanani, “Translators and mediators: bilingual young people's accounts of their interpreting work in health care,” in Soc Sci Med., vol. 60, no. 9, pp. 2097-2110, May 2005.
 D. Kuo, and M. J. Fagan, “Satisfaction with methods of Spanish interpretation in an ambulatory care clinic,” in J. Gen. Intern. Med., vol. 14, no. 9, pp. 547-550, Sep. 1999.
 C. Heaney, and S. Moreham, “Use of interpreter services in a metropolitan healthcare system,” in Aust. Health Rev., vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 38-45, Jun. 2002.
 The Australian Institute of Interpreters and Translators, AUSIT Code of Ethics and Code of Conduct, Canberra: The Australian Institute of Interpreters and Translators, 2012. Available at: http://ausit.org/AUSIT/Documents/Code_Of_Ethics_Full.pdf (Accessed on May 23, 2014).
 E. T. Hall, Byond Culture, New York: Anchor Press, 1976.
 E. Rosenberg, Y. Leanze, and R. Seller, “Doctor–patient communication in primary care with an interpreter: Physician perceptions of professional and family interpreters,” in Patient Educ. Couns., vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 286-292, Aug. 2007.
 E. Ohnuki-Tierney, Illness and culture in contemporary Japan: an anthropological view, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1984.
 J. Cambridge, “Information loss in bilingual medical interviews through an untrained interpreter,” in The Translator, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 201-219, Nov. 1999.
 K. Quan, The High Costs of Language Barriers in Medical Malpractice, Berkeley, CA: University of California, 2010.