PRENACEL: Development and Evaluation of an M-Health Strategy to Improve Prenatal Care in Brazil

Authors: E. M. Vieira, C. S. Vieira, L. P. Bonifácio, L. M. de Oliveira Ciabati, A. C. A. Franzon, F. S. Zaratini, J. A. C. Sanchez, M. S. Andrade, J. P. Dias de Souza

Abstract:

The quality of prenatal care is key to reduce maternal morbidity and mortality. Communication between the health service and users can stimulate prevention and care. M-health has been an important and low cost strategy to health education. The PRENACEL programme (prenatal in the cell phone) was developed. It consists of a programme of information via SMS from the 20^th week of pregnancy up to 12^th week after delivery. Messages were about prenatal care, birth, contraception and breastfeeding. Communication of the pregnant woman asking questions about their health was possible. The objective of this study was to evaluate the implementation of PRENACEL as a useful complement to the standard prenatal care. Twenty health clinics were selected and randomized by cluster, 10 as the intervention group and 10 as the control group. In the intervention group, women and their partner were invited to participate. The control group received the standard prenatal care. All women were interviewed in the immediate post-partum and in the 12^th and 24^th week post-partum. Most women were married, had more than 8 years of schooling and visit the clinic more than 6 times during prenatal care. The intervention group presented lowest percentage of higher economic participants (5.6%), less single mothers and no drug user. It also presented more prenatal care visits than the control group and it was less likely to present Severe Acute Maternal Mortality when compared to control group as well as higher percentage of partners (75.4%) was present at the birth compared to control group. Although the study is still being carried out, preliminary data are showing positive results of the compliance of women to prenatal care.

Keywords: Cellphone, health technology, prenatal care, prevention.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1126866

References:

[1] Ki-Moon B. Global strategy for women and children’s health. New York: United Nations. 2010.
[2] Morse ML, Fonseca SC, Barbosa MD, Calil MB, Eyer FPC. Mortalidade materna no Brasil: o que mostra a produção científica nos últimos 30 anos? Cad. Saúde Pública (Internet). 2011 Apr (cited 2015 July 20); 27 (4): 623-638.
[3] Say L, Souza JP, Pattinson RC. Maternal near miss – towards a standard tool for monitoring quality of maternal health care. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2009;23(3):287-96.
[4] Galvão LPL et al. The prevalence of severe maternal morbidity and near miss and associated factors in Sergipe, Northeast Brazil. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2014.
[5] Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Diretoria de Pesquisas. Coordenação de População e Indicadores Sociais. Gerência de Indicadores Sociais. Síntese de indicadores sociais 2013: Uma análise das condições de vida da população brasileira, 2013. Disponível em: < http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/presidencia/noticias/imprensa/ppts/00000015471711102013171529343967.pdf>. Acesso em: 16 abr. 2014.
[6] BRASIL. Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde. Departamento de Análise de Situação de Saúde. Saúde Brasil 2011: uma análise da situação de saúde e a vigilância da saúde da mulher. Brasília, DF: Ministério da Saúde, 2012a. 444 p.
[7] DATASUS. Ministério da Saúde. Painel de Monitoramento da Mortalidade Materna. 2015. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 01 de jun de 2016.
[8] Araújo CL, Shimizu HE, Sousa AIA, Hamann EM. Incidência da sífilis congênita no Brasil e sua relação com a Estratégia Saúde da Família. Rev. Saúde Pública (Internet). 2012 June (cited 2015 July 20); 46(3): 479-486.
[9] Brasil, Ministério da Saúde, Secretaria de Gestão Estratégica e Participativa, Departamento de Ouvidoria Geral do SUS. Relatório Preliminar de Pesquisa: Resultados Preliminares da Pesquisa de Satisfação com mulheres puérperas atendidas no Sistema Único de Saúde –SUS (Maio a Outubro de 2012). Brasília: Ministério da Saúde, 2012.
[10] Leal MC. Estar grávida no Brasil. Cad. Saúde Pública (Internet). 2012 Aug (cited 2015 July 20); 28(8): 1420-1421.
[11] Venturi G, Godinho T (Orgs). Mulheres brasileiras e gênero nos espaços público e privado. Uma década de mudanças na opinião pública. Editora Fundação Perseu Abramo. Sesc SP; 2013.
[12] World Health Organization (WHO). Quality of care: a process for making strategic choices in health systems. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2006.
[13] Gonçalves CV, Cesar JA, Mendoza-Sassi RA. Qualidade e eqüidade na assistência à gestante: um estudo de base populacional no Sul do Brasil. Cad. Saúde Pública (Internet). 2009 Nov (cited 2015 July 20); 25 (11): 2507-2516.
[14] Domingues RMSM, Hartz ZMA, Dias MAB, Leal MC. Avaliação da adequação da assistência pré-natal na rede SUS do Município do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. Cad. Saúde Pública (Internet). 2012 Mar (cited 2015 July 20); 28(3): 425-437.
[15] Conde-Agudelo A, Rosas-Bermúdez A, Kafury-Goeta AC. Effects of birth spacing on maternal health: a systematic review. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2007;196(4):297-308
[16] Grisaru-Granovsky S, Gordon E-S, Haklai Z, Samueloff A, Schimmel MM. Effect of interpregnancy interval on adverse perinatal outcomes — a national study. Contraception. 2009;80(6):512-8
[17] Kaplan WA. Can the ubiquitous power of mobile phones be used to improve health outcomes in developing countries? Global Health. 2006 May 23;2:9.
[18] Coomes CM, Lewis MA, Uhrig JD, Furberg RD, Harris JL, Bann CM. Beyond reminders: a conceptual framework for using short message service to promote prevention and improve healthcare quality and clinical outcomes for people living with HIV. AIDS Care. 2012;24(3):348-57.
[19] Evans WD, Wallace JL, Snider J. Pilot evaluation of the text4baby mobile health program. BMC Public Health. 2012 Nov 26;12:1031. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-12-1031. PubMed PMID: 23181985; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3570294.
[20] Cormick G, Kim NA, Rodgers A, Gibbons L, Buekens PM, Belizán JM, Althabe F. Interest of pregnant women in the use of SMS (short message service) text messages for the improvement of perinatal and postnatal care. Reprod Health. 2012 Aug 6;9:9. PubMed PMID: 22866753; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3453517.
[21] Lori JR, Munro ML, Boyd CJ, Andreatta P. Cell phones to collect pregnancy data from remote areas in Liberia. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2012 Sep;44(3):294-301. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2012.01451.x. Epub 2012 Jun 4. PubMed PMID: 22672157; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3432659.
[22] Evans WD, Abroms LC, Poropatich R, Nielsen PE, Wallace JL. Mobile health evaluation methods: The Text4baby case study. J Health Commun. 2012; 17 Suppl 1:22-9. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2011.649157. PubMed PMID: 22548595.
[23] Vital Wave Consulting. mHealth for Development: The Opportunity of Mobile Technology for Healthcare in the Developing World. Washington, D.C. and Berkshire, UK: UN Foundation-Vodafone Foundation Partnership, 2009.
[24] Chib A, Wilkin H, Ling LX, Hoefman B, Van Biejma H. You have an important message! Evaluating the effectiveness of a text message HIV/AIDS campaign in Northwest Uganda. J Health Commun. 2012;17Suppl 1:146-57.
[25] ANATEL. Relatório anual de 2013. Brasília, DF: ANATEL, 2013.