Commenced in January 2007
Paper Count: 30743
Analysis of the CO2 Emissions of Public Passenger Transport in Tianjin City of China
Abstract:Low-carbon public passenger transport is an important part of low carbon city. The CO2 emissions of public passenger transport in Tianjin from 1995 to 2010 are estimated with IPCC CO2 counting method, which shows that the total CO2 emissions of Tianjin public passenger transport have gradually become stable at 1,425.1 thousand tons. And then the CO2 emissions of the buses, taxies, and rail transits are calculated respectively. A CO2 emission of 829.9 thousand tons makes taxies become the largest CO2 emissions source among the public passenger transport in Tianjin. Combining with passenger volume, this paper analyzes the CO2 emissions proportion of the buses, taxies, and rail transits compare the passenger transport rate with the proportion of CO2 emissions, as well as the CO2 emissions change of per 10,000 people. The passenger volume proportion of bus among the three public means of transport is 72.62% which is much higher than its CO2 emissions proportion of 36.01%, with the minimum number of CO2 emissions per 10,000 people of 4.90 tons. The countermeasures to reduce CO2 emissions of public passenger transport in Tianjin are to develop rail transit, update vehicles and use alternative fuel vehicles.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1126503Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 670
 Guzay Pasaoglu, Michel Honselaar, Christian Thiel, “Potential vehicle ﬂeet CO2 reductions and cost implications for various vehicle technology deployment scenarios in Europe”. Energy Policy, vol.40, 2012, pp.404–421.
 Hong Huo, Michael Wang, Xiliang Zhang, et al., “Projection of energy use and greenhouse gas emissions by motor vehicles in China: Policy options and impacts”. Energy Policy, vol. 43, 2012, pp.37–48.
 B.T. Tompkins, H. Song, J.A. Bittle, et al.., “Efﬁciency considerations for the use of blended biofuel in diesel engines”. Applied Energy, vol.98, 2012, pp.209–218.
 Garrett E. Barter, David Reichmuth, Jessica Westbrook, et al.., “Parametric analysis of technology and policy tradeoffs for conventional and electric light-duty vehicles”. Energy Policy, vol. 46, 2012, pp. 473–488.
 Lisa Goransson, Sten Karlsson, Filip Johnsson, “Integration of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles in a regional wind-thermal power system”. Energy Policy, vol. 38, 2010, pp.5482–5492.
 Christian Thiel, Adolfo Perujo, Arnaud Mercier, “Cost and CO2 aspects of future vehicle options in Europe under new energy policy scenarios”. Energy Policy, vol. 38, 2010, pp.7142–7151.
 Ou Xunmina, Xiaoyu Yand, Zhang Xilianga, “Using coal for transportation in China: Life cycle GHG of coal-based fuel and electric vehicle， and policy implications”. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, vol. 4, 2010, pp. 878–887.
 Xunmin Ou, Xiliang Zhang, Shiyan Chang, “Scenario analysis on alternative fuel/vehicle for China’s future road transport: Life-cycle energy demand and GHG emissions”. Energy Policy, vol.38, 2010, pp. 3943–3956.
 Xunmin Ou, Xiliang Zhang, Shiyan Chang, “Alternative fuel buses currently in use in China: Life-cycle fossil energy use, GHG emissions and policy recommendations”. Energy Policy, vol. 38, 2010, pp.406–418.
 Stefano Campanari, Giampaolo Manzolini, Fernando Garcia de la Iglesia, “Energy analysis of electric vehicles using batteries or fuel cells through well-to-wheel driving cycle simulations”. Journal of Power Sources, vol.186, 2009, pp.464–477.
 Jan Hromádko, Petr Miler, “Environmental beneﬁts analysis of electric vehicles in the Czech Republic”. Transportation Research Part D, vol.17, 2012, pp.251–255.
 Zhang Qing, Tao Xiaoma, Yang Peng, “Research on Carbon Emissions from Metropolis Urban Passenger Transport and Countermeasures”. China Population, Resources and Environment, vol.22, 2012, pp.35-42.