Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 30135
Enhancing Cooperation Between LEAs and Citizens: The INSPEC2T Approach

Authors: George Leventakis, George Kokkinis, Nikos Moustakidis, George Papalexandratos, Ioanna Vasiliadou

Abstract:

Enhancing the feeling of public safety and crime prevention are tasks customarily assigned to the Police. Police departments have, however, recognized that traditional ways of policing methods are becoming obsolete; Community Policing (CP) philosophy; however, when applied appropriately, leads to seamless collaboration between various stakeholders like the Police, NGOs and the general public and provides the opportunity to identify risks, assist in solving problems of crime, disorder, safety and crucially contribute to improving the quality of life for everyone in a community. Social Media, on the other hand, due to its high level of infiltration in modern life, constitutes a powerful mechanism which offers additional and direct communication channels to reach individuals or communities. These channels can be utilized to improve the citizens’ perception of the Police and to capture individual and community needs, when their feedback is taken into account by Law Enforcement Agencies (LEAs) in a structured and coordinated manner. This paper presents research conducted under INSPEC2T (Inspiring CitizeNS Participation for Enhanced Community PoliCing AcTions), a project funded by the European Commission’s research agenda to bridge the gap between CP as a philosophy and as an organizational strategy, capitalizing on the use of Social Media. The project aims to increase transparency, trust, police accountability, and the role of civil society. It aspires to build strong, trusting relationships between LEAs and the public, supporting two-way, contemporary communication while at the same time respecting anonymity of all affected parties. Results presented herein summarize the outcomes of four online multilingual surveys, focus group interviews, desktop research and interviews with experts in the field of CP practices. The above research activities were conducted in various EU countries aiming to capture requirements of end users from diverse backgrounds (social, cultural, legal and ethical) and determine public expectations regarding CP, community safety and crime prevention.

Keywords: Community partnerships, next generation community policing, public safety, social media.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1126187

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 772

References:


[1] W.M, Oliver. and E. Bartgis, 1998. Community policing: a conceptual framework. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 21(3), pp.490-509.
[2] R.R. Friedmann, 1992. Community policing: Comparative perspectives and prospects.
[3] J. Seagrave, 1996. Defining community policing. American Journal of Police, 15(2), pp.1-22.
[4] L. Johnston, 2005. From ‘community’ to ‘neighbourhood’ policing: police community support officers and the ‘police extended family’ in London. Journal of community & applied social psychology, 15(3), pp.241-254.
[5] N. Tilley, 2008. Modern approaches to policing: community, problem-oriented and intelligence-led. Handbook of policing, 2.
[6] Cordner, G., 2014. Community policing. The Oxford Handbook of Police and Policing, p.148.
[7] Fielding, N.G., 1995. Community policing. Oxford University Press. Vancouver
[8] Seagrave, J., 1996. Defining community policing. American Journal of Police, 15(2), pp.1-22.
[9] A. Myhill, 2006. Community engagement in policing: Lessons from literature. Home Office.
[10] D. Trottier, 2015). Open Source Intelligence, Social media and Law Enforcement: Visions, Constraints and Critiques, European Journal of Cultural Studies, 18 (4-5), pp. 530-547.