Reducing Uncertainty of Monte Carlo Estimated Fatigue Damage in Offshore Wind Turbines Using FORM

Authors: Jan-Tore H. Horn, Jørgen Juncher Jensen

Abstract:

Uncertainties related to fatigue damage estimation of non-linear systems are highly dependent on the tail behaviour and extreme values of the stress range distribution. By using a combination of the First Order Reliability Method (FORM) and Monte Carlo simulations (MCS), the accuracy of the fatigue estimations may be improved for the same computational efforts. The method is applied to a bottom-fixed, monopile-supported large offshore wind turbine, which is a non-linear and dynamically sensitive system. Different curve fitting techniques to the fatigue damage distribution have been used depending on the sea-state dependent response characteristics, and the effect of a bi-linear S-N curve is discussed. Finally, analyses are performed on several environmental conditions to investigate the long-term applicability of this multistep method. Wave loads are calculated using state-of-the-art theory, while wind loads are applied with a simplified model based on rotor thrust coefficients.

Keywords: Fatigue damage, FORM, monopile, monte carlo simulation, reliability, wind turbine.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1126035

References:

[1] D. Zwick and M. Muskulus, “The simulation error caused by input loading variability in offshore wind turbine structural analysis,” Wind Energy, vol. 18, no. 8, aug 2015.
[2] J. J. Jensen, “Fatigue damage estimation in non-linear systems using a combination of Monte Carlo simulation and the First Order Reliability Method,” Marine Structures, vol. 44, pp. 203–210, dec 2015.
[3] P.-L. Liu and A. Der Kiureghian, “Optimization algorithms for structural reliability,” Structural Safety, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 161–177, feb 1991. (Online). Available: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0167473091900417
[4] H. Madsen, S. Krenk, and N. Lind, Methods of Structural Safety. Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1986.
[5] DNV GL, “RP-C203 Fatigue design of offshore steel structures,” Tech. Rep. April, 2005.
[6] WAFO-group, “WAFO - A Matlab Toolbox for Analysis of Random Waves and Loads,” 2000. (Online). Available: http://www.maths.lth.se/matstat/wafo/
[7] T. Moan and A. Naess, Stochastic Dynamics of Marine Structures. Cambridge University Press, 2013.
[8] C. Bak, F. Zahle, R. Bitsche, A. Yde, L. C. Henriksen, A. Nata, and M. H. Hansen, “Description of the DTU 10 MW Reference Wind Turbine,” no. July, 2013.
[9] E. Smilden and L. Eliassen, “Wind Model for Simulation of Thrust Variations on a Wind Turbine,” Energy Procedia, 2016.
[10] O. M. Faltinsen, J. N. Newman, and T. Vinje, “Nonlinear wave loads on a slender vertical cylinder,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 289, p. 179, apr 1995. (Online). Available: http://journals.cambridge.org/abstract S0022112095001297
[11] X. Y. Zheng, T. Moan, and S. T. Quek, “Numerical simulation of non-Gaussian wave elevation and kinematics based on two-dimensional fourier transform,” pp. 1–6, 2006.
[12] M. Tucker, P. Challenor, and D. Carter, “Numerical simulation of a random sea: a common error and its effect upon wave group statistics,” Applied Ocean Research, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 118–122, apr 1984.
[13] J. T. H. Horn, J. R. Krokstad, and J. Amdahl, “Hydro-Elastic Contributions to Fatigue Damage on a Large Monopile,” Energy Procedia, 2016.
[14] DNV GL, “OS-J101 Design of Offshore Wind Turbine Structures,” Tech. Rep., 2014.
[15] T. Burton, D. Sharpe, N. Jenkins, and E. Bossanyi, Wind Energy Handbook. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2002. (Online). Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/0470846062.ch4
[16] J. J. Jensen, “Extreme value predictions using Monte Carlo simulations with artificially increased load spectrum,” Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 399–404, apr 2011. (Online). Available: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266892010000767