Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 30127
Enhanced Magnetoelastic Response near Morphotropic Phase Boundary in Ferromagnetic Materials: Experimental and Theoretical Analysis

Authors: Murtaza Adil, Sen Yang, Zhou Chao, Song Xiaoping

Abstract:

The morphotropic phase boundary (MPB) recently has attracted constant interest in ferromagnetic systems for obtaining enhanced large magnetoelastic response. In the present study, structural and magnetoelastic properties of MPB involved ferromagnetic Tb1-xGdxFe2 (0≤x≤1) system has been investigated. The change of easy magnetic direction from <111> to <100> with increasing x up MPB composition of x=0.9 is detected by step-scanned [440] synchrotron X-ray diffraction reflections. The Gd substitution for Tb changes the composition for the anisotropy compensation near MPB composition of x=0.9, which was confirmed by the analysis of detailed scanned XRD, magnetization curves and the calculation of the first anisotropy constant K1. The spin configuration diagram accompanied with different crystal structures for Tb1-xGdxFe2 was designed. The calculated first anisotropy constant K1 shows a minimum value at MPB composition of x=0.9. In addition, the large ratio between magnetostriction, and the absolute values of the first anisotropy constant │λS∕K1│ appears at MPB composition, which makes it a potential material for magnetostrictive application. Based on experimental results, a theoretically approach was also proposed to signify that the facilitated magnetization rotation and enhanced magnetoelastic effect near MPB composition are a consequence of the anisotropic flattening of free energy of ferromagnetic crystal. Our work specifies the universal existence of MPB in ferromagnetic materials which is important for substantial improvement of magnetic and magnetostrictive properties and may provide a new route to develop advanced functional materials.

Keywords: Free energy, lattice distortion, magnetic anisotropy, magnetostriction, morphotropic phase boundary.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1125941

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 809

References:


[1] B. Jaffe, W.R. Cook, H. Jaffe, Piezoelectric Ceramics (Academic). New York: 1971.
[2] K. Uchino, Ferroelectric Devices (Marcel Dekker). New York: 2000.
[3] Ahart M, Somayazulu M, Cohen RE, Ganesh P, Dera P, Mao HK, Hemley RJ, Ren Y, Liermann P, Wu Z, “Origin of morphotropic phase boundaries in ferroelectrics”. Nature., vol. 451, Jan. 2008, pp. 545-8.
[4] V.K. Wadhawan, Introduction to Ferroic Materials, Gordon and Breach, Amsterdam: 2000.
[5] N. A. Spaldin Analogies and differences between ferroelectrics and ferromagnets. In Physics of Ferroelectrics, Springer Berlin Heidelberg: 2007. pp. 175-218.
[6] R. E. Newnham. “Phase transformations in smart materials”. Acta Crystallographica Section A: Foundations of Crystallography., vol. 54, Nov. 1998, pp.729-37.
[7] S. Yang, H. Bao, C. Zhou, Y. Wang, X. Ren, Y. Matsushita et.al, “Large Magnetostriction from Morphotropic Phase Boundary in Ferromagnets”. Physical review letters., vol.104, May .2010, pp. 197201.
[8] C. Zhou, S. Ren, H. Bao, S. Yang, Y. Yao, Y. Ji, X. Ren, Y. Matsushita, Y. Katsuya, M. Tanaka, K. Kobayashi. “Inverse effect of morphotropic phase boundary on the magnetostriction of ferromagnetic Tb1−xGdxCo2”. Physical Review B., vol. 89, Mar .2014, pp.100101.
[9] J. R. Bergstrom, M. Wuttig, J. Cullen, P. Zavalij, R. Briber, C. Dennis, V. O. Garlea, M. Laver. “Morphotropic Phase Boundaries in Ferromagnets: Tb1− xDyxFe2 Alloys.” Physical review letters., vol. 111, Jul .2013, pp. 017203.
[10] M. Adil, S. Yang, M. Mi, C. Zhou, J. Wang, R. Zhang, X. Liao, Y. Wang, X. Ren, X. Song, Y. Ren. “Morphotropic phase boundary and magnetoelastic behaviour in ferromagnetic Tb1-xGdxFe2 system. Applied Physics Letters., vol. 106, Mar. 2015, pp.132403.
[11] J. R. Cullen and A. E. Clark, “Magnetostriction and structural distortion in rare-earth intermetallics”. Phys. Rev. B., vol. 15, May. 1977, pp. 4510S.
[12] W. J. Ren, Z. D. Zhang, X. P. Song, X. G. Zhao, and X. M. Jin, “Composition anisotropy compensation and spontaneous magnetostriction in Tb0.2Dy0.8-xPrx(Fe0.9B0.1)1.93 alloys”. Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 82, Apr .2003, pp. 2664.
[13] A. E. Dwight and C. W. Kimball, “TbFe2, a rhombohedral Laves phase”. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. B: Struct. Crystallogr. Cryst. Chem., vol. 30, Nov.1974, pp. 2791.
[14] W. J. Ren, Z. D. Zhang, A. S. Markysan, X. G. Zhao, X. M. Jin and X. P. Song, “The beneficial effect of the boron substitution on the magnetostrictive compound Tb0.7Pr0. 3Fe2, J. Phys. D. vol. 34, Oct. 2001, pp. 3024.
[15] E. Gratz, A. Lindbaum, A. S. Markosyan, H. Mueller, and A. Y. Sokolov, "Isotropic and anisotropic magnetoelastic interactions in heavy and light RCo2 Laves phase compounds." J. Phys.: Condens. Matter., Aug. 1994, vol.4, pp. 6699.
[16] S. Chikazumi, Physics of Ferromagnetism, ed. 2nd. New York: 1997, p. 503.
[17] A.E. Clark, in: E.P. Wohlfarth (Ed.), Ferromagnetic Materials, vol. 1, North- Holland:1980, p. 531-589.
[18] C. Kittel, "Physical theory of ferromagnetic domains", Rev. Mod. Phys., Oct.1949, vol. 21, pp. 54.
[19] K. H. Ahn, T. Lookman, and A. R. Bishop, “Strain-induced metal–insulator phase coexistence in perovskite manganites” Nature (London), Mar.2004, vol. 428, pp. 401.
[20] N. S. Akulov, "Magnetostriction of Iron Crystals”, Z. Phys., vol.52, Nov.1928, pp.389.
[21] R. C. O’Handley, Modern Magnetic Materials: Principles and Applications, Wiley, New York: 2000.