Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 33122
A Study on the Determinants of Earnings Response Coefficient in an Emerging Market
Authors: Bita Mashayekhi, Zeynab Lotfi Aghel
Abstract:
The determinants of Earnings Response Coefficient (ERC), including firm size, earnings growth, and earnings persistence are studied in this research. These determinants are supposed to be moderator variables that affect ERC and Return Response Coefficient. The research sample contains 82 Iranian listed companies in Tehran Stock Exchange (TSE) from 2001 to 2012. Gathered data have been processed by EVIEWS Software. Results show a significant positive relation between firm size and ERC, and also between earnings growth and ERC; however, there is no significant relation between earnings persistence and ERC. Also, the results show that ERC will be increased by firm size and earnings growth, but there is no relation between earnings persistence and ERC.Keywords: Earnings response coefficient, return response coefficient, firm size, earnings growth, earnings persistence.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1125909
Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 2239References:
[1] Scott, William R. 2011. Financial Accounting Theory. 6th edition. Pearson Publication.
[2] Collins, D. and Kothari, S.P. 1989. An Analysis of Intertemporal and Cross-Sectional Determinants of Earnings Response Coefficients. Journal of Accounting and Economics. 11, 143-181.
[3] Billings, B.K. 1999. Revisiting the Relation between the Default Risk of Debt and the Earning Response Coefficient. The Accounting Review.4, 509-522.
[4] Moradi, M., Fallahi, M.A. and Kami, N. 2010. The effect of quality of earning on earning response coefficients. Journal of Knowledge and Development. 33, 143-164. (in Persian)
[5] Charitou, A., Clubb, C. and Andereou, A. 2001. The Effect of Earnings Permanence, Growth and Firm Size on the Usefulness of Cash Flows and Earnings in Explaining Security Returns: Empirical Evidence for the UK. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting. 28, 563-594
[6] Harikumar, T., Harter, C. 1995. Earnings Response Coefficient and Persistence: New Evidence Using Tobin’s Q as a Proxy for Persistence. Journal of Accounting Auditing and Finance, 10(2), 401-420.
[7] Freeman, R.N. 1985. The Association Accounting Earning and Security Return for Large and Small Firms. Journal of Accounting and Economics. 9, 195-228
[8] Bolo, GH. and Mirzaeei, E. 2011. Revenue Growth and Persistence Earning, Earnings Quality and Earnings Response Coefficient. A Quarterly Journal of Empirical Research of Financial Accounting, 3, 37-54. (in Persian)
[9] Ohlson, J.A. 1995. Earnings, Book Values, and Dividends in Equity Valuation. Contemporary Accounting Research. 11, 661-687.
[10] Khoshtinat, M. and Barari Nokashti, S. 2006. Effect of Size on Informativeness of Earnings Announcement. A quarterly journal of Empirical Research of Financial Accounting, 16, 1-18. (in Persian)
[11] Chaney, k., Jeter, C. 1992. The Effect of Size on the Magnitude Long-Window Earnings Response Coefficients. Contemporary Accounting Research, 2, 540-560.
[12] Ghosh, A., Gu, Z. and Jain, P.C. 2005. Sustained Earnings and Revenue Growth, Earnings Quality, and Earnings Response Coefficients. Review of Accounting Studies, 4, 33-57.