Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 30124
Analysis of Factors Used by Farmers to Manage Risk: A Case Study on Italian Farms

Authors: A. Pontrandolfi, G. Enjolras, F. Capitanio

Abstract:

The study analyses the strategies Italian farmers use to cope with the risks that face their production. We specifically explore the potential and the limitations of the economic tools for climatic risk management in agriculture of the Common Agricultural Policy 2014-2020, that foresees contributions for economic tools for risk management, in relation to farms’ needs, exposure and vulnerability of agricultural areas to climatic risk. We consider at the farm level approaches to hedge risks in terms of the use of technical tools (agricultural practices, pesticides, fertilizers, irrigation) and economic/financial instruments (insurances, etc.). We develop cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses as well as analyses of correlation that underline the main differences between the way farms adapt their structure and management towards risk. The results show a preference for technical tools, despite the presence of important public aids on economic tools such as insurances. Therefore, there is a strong need for a more effective and integrated risk management policy scheme. Synergies between economic tools and risk reduction actions of a more technical, structural and management nature (production diversification, irrigation infrastructures, technological and management innovations and formation-information-consultancy, etc.) are emphasized.

Keywords: Agriculture and climate change, climatic risk management, insurance schemes.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1125857

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 854

References:


[1] Bielza Diaz-Caneja M., Conte C. G., Dittmann C., Gallego Pinilla F. J., and Stroblmair J. (2009), Agricultural Insurance Schemes, Joint Research Centre Ispra.
[2] Mahul O. and Stutley C. (2010), International Experience with Agricultural Insurance: Findings from a World Bank Survey of 65 Countries, Annex E to the book Government Support to Agricultural Insurance: Challenges and Options for Developing Countries, The World Bank Washington DC
[3] Pontrandolfi, A. and Nizza G. (2011), Prospettive della gestione del rischio in agricoltura. Riflessioni per un sistema integrato per la PAC post 2013, INEA Roma ISBN 9788881452217
[4] Chatellier V. (2011), Price volatility, market regulation and risk management: challenges for the future of the CAP, International Agricultural Policy, vol. 1, pp 33-50.
[5] European Commission (2005), Commission staff working document on risk and crisis management in agriculture, SEC (2005) 320, Bruxelles 09/03/2005
[6] European Commission, Regulation (EU) n. 1305/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development, 2013
[7] Cafiero C., Capitanio F., Cioffi A., and Coppola A. (2007), La gestione del rischio nelle imprese agricole tra strumenti privati e intervento pubblico, Agriregionieuropa Anno 3 n. 8/2007
[8] Capitanio F., Bielza M.D.C., Cafiero C., and Adinolfi F. (2011), Crop insurance and public intervention in the risk management in agriculture: does farmers really benefit? Applied Economics, Volume 43, Issue 27 November 2011, pp. 4149-415
[9] Pontrandolfi A. (2013), Risk management tools in agriculture: some reflections on opportunities and limitations of the European commission proposal, in International Agricultural Policy vol. 2, pp 21-32
[10] http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/rica/concept_en.cfm
[11] http://www.rica.inea.it/public/it/index.php
[12] Serra T., Zilberman D., Goodwin B.K., and Hyvonen K. (2005), Replacement of price support measures by area payments in the EU and the effects on pesticide use, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 87:(2005), pp. 870-884