Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 30745
Calculation of Methane Emissions from Wetlands in Slovakia via IPCC Methodology

Authors: Jozef Mindas, Jana Skvareninova


Wetlands are a main natural source of methane emissions, but they also represent the important biodiversity reservoirs in the landscape. There are about 26 thousands hectares of wetlands in Slovakia identified via the wetlands monitoring program. Created database of wetlands in Slovakia allows to analyze several ecological processes including also the methane emissions estimate. Based on the information from the database, the first estimate of the methane emissions from wetlands in Slovakia has been done. The IPCC methodology (Tier 1 approach) has been used with proposed emission factors for the ice-free period derived from the climatic data. The highest methane emissions of nearly 550 Gg are associated with the category of fens. Almost 11 Gg of methane is emitted from bogs, and emissions from flooded lands represent less than 8 Gg.

Keywords: Wetlands, Slovakia, bogs, methane emissions, fens

Digital Object Identifier (DOI):

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 765


[1] Aselman, I.-Crutzen, P.J.: Global distribution of natural freshwater wetlands and rice paddies, their net primary productivity, seasonality and possible methane emissions. J.Atmos. Chem., 8, 1989, p.307-358.
[2] Bastviken, D., J. Cole, M. Pace, and L. Tranvik (2004), Methane emissions from lakes: Dependence of lake characteristics, two regional assessments, and a global estimate, Global Biogeochem. Cycles, 18, GB4009, doi: 10.1029/2004GB002238.
[3] Forster P, Ramaswamy P, Artaxo P et al. (2007) Changes in atmospheric constituents and in radiative forcing. In: Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL), pp. 129–234. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
[4] IPCC 2006, 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Prepared by the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme, Eggleston H.S., Buendia L., Miwa K., Ngara T. and Tanabe K. (eds). Volume 4: Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use-Chapter 7 Wetlands. Published: IGES, Japan. Available also:
[5] J. Couwenberg & C. Fritz, IPCC Methane Emission Factors for Peatlands (Organic Soils). Mires and Peat, Volume 10 (2012), Article 03, 1–17,, ISSN 1819-754X
[6] M. Knížatová, J. Šottník, Š. Mihina, 2007. Ammonia and methane emissions from livestock production in Slovakia. (in Slovak). In: Střelcová, K., Škvarenina, J. & Blaženec, M. (eds.): “Bioclimatology and natural hazards” International Scientific Conference, Poľana nad Detvou, Slovakia, September 17 - 20, 2007, ISBN 978-80-228-17-60-8.
[7] Minďaš, J., 2011, Atmosphere and Forest: Gas Emissions – Air Pollution (in Slovak). SEVS Skalica, TU Zvolen, 1st. Edition, pp. 85, ISBN 978-80-228-2217-6.
[8] Q. Zhu1, J. Liu, C. Peng, H. Chen, X. Fang, H. Jiang, G. Yang1, D. Zhu, W. Wang, and X. Zhou, 2014. Modelling methane emissions from natural wetlands by development and application of the TRIPLEX-GHG model. Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 981–999, 2014. doi:10.5194/gmd-7-981-2014
[9] Scott D. Bridgham, Hinsby Cadillo-Quiroz†, Jason K. Keller and Qianlai Zhuang Methane emissions from wetlands: biogeochemical, microbial, and modeling perspectives from local to global scales - Invited Review. Global Change Biology (2013) 19, 1325–1346, doi: 10.1111/gcb.1213.
[10] Stanová, V. (ed.), 2000. Peatlands in Slovakia. Daphne- Institute of Apply Ecology. Bratislava, 194 p. (in Slovak)
[11] Sun, L., Song, Ch., Miao Y., Qiao T., Gong, Ch., 2013. Temporal and spatial variability of methane emissions in a northern temperate marsh. Atmospheric Environment, 81 (2013), pp. 356-363.
[12] Whalen, S.C. 2005. Biogeochemistry of methane exchange between natural wetlands and the atmosphere. Environ. Eng. Sci. 22(1): 73-94.