Commenced in January 2007
Paper Count: 30835
Domain Driven Design vs Soft Domain Driven Design Frameworks
Abstract:This paper presents and compares the SSDDD “Systematic Soft Domain Driven Design Framework” to DDD “Domain Driven Design Framework” as a soft system approach of information systems development. The framework use SSM as a guiding methodology within which we have embedded a sequence of design tasks based on the UML leading to the implementation of a software system using the Naked Objects framework. This framework has been used in action research projects that have involved the investigation and modelling of business processes using object-oriented domain models and the implementation of software systems based on those domain models. Within this framework, Soft Systems Methodology (SSM) is used as a guiding methodology to explore the problem situation and to develop the domain model using UML for the given business domain. The framework is proposed and evaluated in our previous works, a comparison between SSDDD and DDD is presented in this paper, to show how SSDDD improved DDD as an approach to modelling and implementing business domain perspectives for Information Systems Development. The comparison process, the results, and the improvements are presented in the following sections of this paper.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1125787Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1480
 Joseph Barjis, “The importance of business process modelling in software systems design”, Science of Computer Programming Journal, vol 71, pp 73–87, 2008.
 Alter, S., “The work system method: Connecting people, processes and IT for business results”, Work System Press, Larkspur, CA, 2007.
 Sewchurran, K. & Petkov D, “A systemic Frame¬work for Business Process Modelling Com¬bining Soft Systems Methodology and UML”, Infor¬mation Re¬sources Management Journal, 20, 3, IGI Publishing, PA, USA, P. 46-62., 2007.
 Salahat, M., Wade, S., Lu, J., A systemic Framework for Business Process Modelling and Implementation, In the proceeding of 5th International Conference on Innovations of Information Technology (Innovations’08), UAE University, Al Ain, UAE, in IEEE explore 978-1-4244-3397-1/08., 2008.
 Mohammed Salahat, Steve Wade. A Systems Thinking Approach to Domain-Driven Design. In the proceeding of UKAIS2009 conference, Oxford University, Oxford, UK, 2009.
 Eric Evan, Domain-Driven Design –Tackling Complexity in the Heart of Software, Addison Wesley, 2004.
 Al Humaidan, F., “Evaluation and Development Models for Business Processes”, PhD thesis, Uni¬versity of Newcastle, UK, 2006
 Checkland, P., and Poulter J., “Learning for Ac¬tion. A short Definitive Account of Soft Systems Meth¬odology and its use for Practitioners, Teachers and Students”, John Wiley and Sons Ltd, West Sussex, England, 2006.
 Checkland, P., “Systems Thinking, Systems Prac¬tice”, John Wiley and Sons Ltd, West Sussex, Eng¬land, 1999.
 Checkland, P. and Holwell, S.E., “Information, Systems and Information Systems, Making sense of the field”, John Wiley and Sons Ltd, West Sussex, Eng¬land, 1998.
 Bustard, D. W., Dobbin, T. J., and Carey, B. N., “Integrating Soft Systems and Object-Oriented Analy¬sis”, IEEE International Conference on Requirements Engineering, Colorado Springs, Colorado, pp. 52-59, 1996.
 Wade, S. and Hopkins, J., “A Framework for Incor¬porating Systems Thinking into Object Oriented Design” Seventh CAiSE/IFIP8.1 International Workshop on Evaluation of Modeling Methods in Systems Analysis and Design (EMMSAD’02), Toronto, Canada, May, 27-28,2002.
 Al-Humaidan, F., & Rossiter, N.,” Business Process Modelling with OBPM combining soft and hard approaches”, in Proceeding of 1st Workshop on Computer Supported Activity Coordination (CSAC), 6th International Conference on Enterprise Informa¬tion Systems, Porto,, pp 253-260, 13-14 April,, 2004.
 Erikksonn, H. E., & Penker, M., “UML business process modelling at work”, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 2000.
 John Mingers, “Combining IS Research Methods: Towards a Pluralist Methodology”, Infor¬mation Systems Research, 12, 3, Institute for Opera¬tions Research and the Management Sciences (IN¬FORMS), pp. 240-259, 2001.
 D. Platt, “Process Modelling and Process Support Environment to Design Management”, Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Bristol, UK, 1994.
 Daveport, T. h. Process innovation: Reengineering work through information technology, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, Mass, 1993.
 Warboys, Brian, Kawalek, Peter, Robertson, Ian, and Greenwood, Mark, “Business Information Sys¬tems-A process approach”, McGraw-Hill, UK, 1999.
 Svatopluk Štolfa, Ivo Vondrák, “Mapping from Business Processes to Requirements Specifica¬tion”, Retrieved on 7th Aug, 2008 from 18.104.22.168/conf/esm/esm2006/abstract.pdf
 Pawson R. & Mathews R., “Naked Objects”, John Wiley and Sons Ltd, West Sussex, England, 2002.
 Salahat, M., Wade, S., Ul-Haq, I.(2009) The Application of A systemic Soft Domain Driven Design Framework, World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology online Journal, Issue57,pp476-486.
 Salahat, M., Wade S. (2012) Pedadogical Evaluation of S systemic Soft Domain-Driven Design, In the proceeding of UKAIS2012 conference, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.
 Wade, S., Salahat, M., Wilson, D.(2012) A Scaffolded Approach to Teaching Information Systems Design. ITALICS Volume 11 Issue 1 June 2012 - ISSN: 1473-7507
 Salahat, M., Wade S. (2014) Teaching Information Systems Development Through an Integrated Framework, In the proceeding of UKAIS2014 conference, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.
 Curtis, B., et al. (1992). Process modelling. Communications of the ACM 35(9): 75-90.V:9, No:6, Year:2015
 Salahat, M. and S. Wade (2015). Business Domain Modelling Using an Integrated Framework. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology organization conference, London,UK. International Science Index. Vol:9,No:6,2015.