Environmental Accounting Practice: Analyzing the Extent and Qualification of Environmental Disclosures of Turkish Companies Located in BIST-XKURY Index

Authors: Raif Parlakkaya, Mustafa Nihat Demirci, Mehmet Nuri Salur

Abstract:

Environmental pollution has detrimental effects on the quality of our life and its scope has reached such an extent that measures are being taken both at the national and international levels to reduce, prevent and mitigate its impact on social, economic and political spheres. Therefore, awareness of environmental problems has been increasing among stakeholders and accordingly among companies. It is seen that corporate reporting is expanding beyond environmental performance. Primary purpose of publishing an environmental report is to provide specific audiences with useful, meaningful information. This paper is intended to analyze the extent and qualification of environmental disclosures of Turkish publicly quoted firms and see how it varies from one sector to another. The data for the study were collected from annual activity reports of companies, listed on the corporate governance index (BIST-XKURY) of Istanbul Stock Exchange. Content analysis was the research methodology used to measure the extent of environmental disclosure. Accordingly, 2015 annual activity reports of companies that carry out business in some particular fields were acquired from Capital Market Board, websites of Public Disclosure Platform and companies’ own websites. These reports were categorized into five main aspects: Environmental policies, environmental management systems, environmental protection and conservation activities, environmental awareness and information on environmental lawsuits. Subsequently, each component was divided into several variables related to what each firm is supposed to disclose about environmental information. In this context, the nature and scope of the information disclosed on each item were assessed according to five different ways (N.I: No Information; G.E.: General Explanations; Q.E.: Qualitative Detailed Explanations; N.E.: Quantitative (numerical) Detailed Explanations; Q.&N.E.: Both Qualitative and Quantitative Explanations).

Keywords: Environmental accounting, disclosure, corporate governance, content analysis.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1339388

References:

[1] A. Jose and S. M. Lee, “Environmental Reporting of Global Corporations: A Content Analysis Based on Website Disclosures”, Journal of Business Ethics, 2007, Vol: 72.
[2] A. Yıldırım, H. ve Şimşek, “Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri”, Seçkin Yayınları, 2005, Ankara.
[3] BİST, “Şirketler İçin Sürdürülebilirlik Rehberi”, http://www.borsaistanbul.com/data/kilavuzlar/surdurulebilirlik-rehberi.pdf (Date Accessed: 2016-06-10)
[4] C. Güney ve A. V. Can, “Faalı̇yet Raporlarında Yer Alan Çevresel Bı̇ldı̇rı̇mler (BİST 100 Endeksı̇nde Yer Alan ve İmalat Sanayı̇ Sektöründe Faalı̇yet Gösteren Şirketler Üzerı̇nde Bir İçerı̇k Analı̇zi”, Akademik Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, Yıl: 3, Sayı: 15, Eylül 2015, s.s. 297-308.
[5] D. Hackston and J. M. Milne, “Some Determinants of Social and Environmental Disclosures in New Zealand Companies”, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 1996, Vol: 9, No: 1.
[6] F. L. Kavut, “Kurumsal Yönetim, Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumluluk ve Çevresel Raporlama: İMKB-100 Şirketlerinin Çevresel Açıklamalarının İncelenmesi”, İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi İşletme İktisadı Enstitüsü Dergisi-Yönetim, 2010, Yıl:21, Sayı:66.
[7] G. Ş. Tanç ve A. Cingöz, “Kurumsal Yönetim ve Çevresel Performans: İMKB’de İşlem Gören Şirketler Üzerine Bir Araştırma”, Muhasebe Bilim Dünyası Dergisi, 2011, 13(4), s.s. 203-219.
[8] H. Aracı ve F. Yüksel, “Şeffalık ve Hesap Verilebilirliğin Sağlanmasında Sürdürülebilirlik Raporları: BİST Sürdürülebilirlik Endeksindeki Şirketlerin Sürdürülebilirlik Raporlarının İncelenmesi”, Muhasebe Bilim Dünyası Dergisi, 2016, 18 (Özel Sayı-1), s.s. 103-131.
[9] J. Salo, “Corporate Governance and Environmental Performance: Industry and Country Effects”, Competition&Change, 2008, 12(4), p.p. 328-354.
[10] L. Holland and Y. B. Foo, “Differences in Environmental Reporting Practices In The UK and The US: The Legal and Regulatory Context”, The British Accounting Review, 2003, Vol: 35.
[11] M. J. Milne and R. W. Adler, “Exploring The Reliability of Social and Environmental Disclosures Content Analysis”, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 1999, Vol: 12, No: 2.
[12] M. Sarmento, D. Durao, and M. Duarte, “Analysis of Companies’ Environmental Strategies for Green Society”, Energy, 2006, 31, p.p. 2333-2340.
[13] M. Smith, K. Yahya, and A. M. Amiruddin, “Environmental Disclosure and Performance Reporting In Malaysia”, Asian Review of Accounting, 2007, Vol: 15, No: 2.
[14] O. Gökçe, “İçerik Analizi”, Siyasal Kitabevi, 2006, Ankara.
[15] Ö. Akçakanat, S. Senal ve B. A. Ateş, “Türkiye Muhasebe Standartları Çalışmalarının İçerik Analizi Bakımından Değerlendirilmesi (2004-2011)”, Uluslararası Alanya İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 2013, C:5, S:3, s.s. 1-8
[16] Resmi Gazete, “Şirketlerin Yıllık Faaliyet Raporunun Asgari İçeriğinin Belirlenmesi Hakkında Yönetmelik”, Tarih: 28.08.2012, Sayı: 28395.
[17] R. Gray, R. Kouhy, and S. Lavers, S., ‘’Methodological Themes Constructing a Research Database of Social and Environmental Reporting by UK Companies’’, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 1995, Vol: 8, No: 2.
[18] SAHA Kurumsal Yönetim ve Kredi Derecelendirme Hizmetleri A.Ş., “Dünyada ve Türkiye’de Derecelendirme”, 2009, http:// www.econfin.boun.edu.tr/yeni/EkonFin_Sunum, (Date Accessed: 2016-06-11).
[19] S. K. Akıncı ve M. M. Akıncı, “Sürdürülebilir Kalkınmaya Katkı Bağlamında Örgütlerin Çevresel Performansları ve Performans Değerlendirme Teknikleri”, Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 2010, 24(1), s.s. 193-207.
[20] S. Stray, “Environmental Reporting: The U.K. Water and Energy Industries: A Research Note”, Journal of Business Ethics, 2008, Vol: 80.
[21] Ş. Sakarya, “İMKB Kurumsal Yönetim Endeksi Kapsamındaki Şirketlerin Kurumsal Yönetim Derecelendirme Notu ve Hisse Senedi Getirileri Arasındaki İlişkinin Olay Çalışması (Event Study) Yöntemi İle Analizi”, ZKÜ Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 2011, 7(13), s.s. 147-162.
[22] Y. Argüden, P. Ilgaz ve B. Erşahin, “ARGE Kurumsal Yönetişim Modeli”, ARGE Danışmanlık Yayınları, No:9, 2007, İstanbul.