Towards the Design of Gripper Independent of Substrate Surface Structures

Authors: Annika Schmidt, Ausama Hadi Ahmed, Carlo Menon

Abstract:

End effectors for robotic systems are becoming more and more advanced, resulting in a growing variety of gripping tasks. However, most grippers are application specific. This paper presents a gripper that interacts with an object’s surface rather than being dependent on a defined shape or size. For this purpose, ingressive and astrictive features are combined to achieve the desired gripping capabilities. The developed prototype is tested on a variety of surfaces with different hardness and roughness properties. The results show that the gripping mechanism works on all of the tested surfaces. The influence of the material properties on the amount of the supported load is also studied and the efficiency is discussed.

Keywords: Claw, dry adhesion, insects, material properties.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1339386

References:

[1] G. J. Monkman, S. Hesse, R. Steinmann, and H. Schunk, Robot Grippers. 2007.
[2] D. T. Pham and S. H. Yeo, “Strategies for gripper design and selection in robotic assembly,” Int. J. Prod. Res., vol. 29, pp. 306–316, 1991.
[3] J. R. Amend, S. Member, E. Brown, N. Rodenberg, and H. M. Jaeger, “A Positive Pressure Universal Gripper Based on the Jamming of Granular Material,” vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 341–350, 2012.
[4] E. Brown, N. Rodenberg, J. Amend, a. Mozeika, E. Steltz, M. R. Zakin, H. Lipson, and H. M. Jaeger, “Universal robotic gripper based on the jamming of granular material,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., vol. 107, no. 44, pp. 18809–18814, Oct. 2010.
[5] G. J. Monkman, “An Analysis of Astrictive Prehension,” Int. J. Rob. Res., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1–10, Feb. 1997.
[6] N. Tsourveloudis, K. P. Valavanis, R. Kolluru, and I. K. Nikolos, “Position and Suction Control of a Reconfigurable Robotic Gripper*,” vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 53–62, 1999.
[7] T. Takahashi, K. Nagato, M. Suzuki, and S. Aoyagi, “Flexible vacuum gripper with autonomous switchable valves,” in 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2013, pp. 364–369.
[8] A. Parness, “Anchoring foot mechanisms for sampling and mobility in microgravity,” 2011 IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Autom., pp. 6596–6599, May 2011.
[9] A. T. Asbeck, M. R. Cutkosky, and W. R. Provancher, “SpinybotII: climbing hard walls with compliant microspines,” in ICAR ’05. Proceedings., 12th International Conference on Advanced Robotics, 2005., 2005, pp. 601–606.
[10] A. Saunders, D. I. Goldman, R. J. Full, and M. Buehler, “The RiSE Climbing Robot: Body and Leg Design,” vol. 6230, pp. 623017–623017–13, May 2006.
[11] J. M. R. Bullock and W. Federle, “The effect of surface roughness on claw and adhesive hair performance in the dock beetle Gastrophysa viridula,” Insect Sci., vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 298–304, Jun. 2011.
[12] Z. Dai, S. Gorb, and U. Schwarz, “Roughness-dependent friction force of the tarsal claw system in the beetle Pachnoda marginata (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae),” J. Exp. Biol., vol. 2488, pp. 2479–2488, 2002.
[13] W. Federle and T. Endlein, “Locomotion and adhesion: dynamic control of adhesive surface contact in ants.,” Arthropod Struct. Dev., vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 67–75, Jan. 2004.
[14] S. N. Gorb, M. Sinha, A. Peressadko, K. a Daltorio, and R. D. Quinn, “Insects did it first: a micropatterned adhesive tape for robotic applications.,” Bioinspir. Biomim., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. S117–25, Dec. 2007.
[15] C. Menon and M. Sitti, “A Biomimetic Climbing Robot Based on the Gecko,” J. Bionic Eng., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 115–125, 2006.
[16] J. Israelichvili, “Intermolecular and surface forces,” Acad. Press. New York, pp. 1–18, 1995.
[17] B. N. J. Persson, “Adhesion between an elastic body and a randomly rough hard surface.,” Eur. Phys. J. E. Soft Matter, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 385–401, Jul. 2002.
[18] T. W. Kim and B. Bhushan, “Adhesion analysis of multi-level hierarchical attachment system contacting with a rough surface,” J. Adhes. Sci. Technol., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 1–20, Jan. 2007.