Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 30101
Water Quality Determination of River Systems in Antalya Basin by Biomonitoring

Authors: Hasan Kalyoncu, Füsun Kılçık, Hatice Gülboy Akyıldırım, Aynur Özen, Mehmet Acar, Nur Yoluk

Abstract:

For evaluation of water quality of the river systems in Antalya Basin, macrozoobenthos samples were taken from 22 determined stations by a hand net and identified at family level. Water quality of Antalya Basin was determined according to Biological Monitoring Working Party (BMWP) system, by using macrozoobenthic invertebrates and physicochemical parameters. As a result of the evaluation, while Aksu Stream was determined as the most polluted stream in Antalya Basin, Isparta Stream was determined as the most polluted tributary of Aksu Stream. Pollution level of the Isparta Stream was determined as quality class V and it is the extremely polluted part of stream. Pollution loads at the sources of the streams were determined in low levels in general. Due to some parts of the streams have passed through deep canyons and take their sources from nonresidential and non-arable regions, majority of the streams that take place in Antalya Basin are at high quality level. Waste water, which comes from agricultural and residential regions, affects the lower basins of the streams. Because of the waste water, lower parts of the stream basins exposed to the pollution under anthropogenic effects. However, in Aksu Stream, which differs by being exposed to domestic and industrial wastes of Isparta City, extreme pollution was determined, particularly in the Isparta Stream part.

Keywords: Antalya Basin, biomonitoring, BMWP, water quality.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1125527

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1044

References:


[1] Armitage PD, Moss D, Wright JF, Furse MT (1983). The performance of a new biological water quality score system based on macroinvertebrates over a wide range of unpolluted runningwater sites. Water Res 17: 333–347.
[2] Barton DR, Metcalfe-Smith JL (1992). A comparison of sampling techniques and summary indices for assessment of water quality in the Yamaska River, Québec, based on benthic macroinvertebrates. Environ Monit Assess 21: 225–244.
[3] Zamora-Munoz C, Alba-Tercedor J (1996). Bioassessment of organically polluted Spanish rivers, using a biotic index and multivariate methods. J N Am Benthol Soc 15: 332–352.
[4] Capítulo, R., A., M. Tangorra, and C.S. Ocón. 2001. Use of benthic macroinvertebrate to assess the ecological status of Pampean rivers (Argentine). Aquatic Ecology 35: 109–119.
[5] Mustow SE (2002). Biological monitoring of rivers in Thailand: use and adaptation of the BMWP score. Hydrobiologia 479: 191– 229.
[6] Czerniawska-Kusza I (2005). Comparing modified biological monitoring working party score system and several biological indices based on macroinvertebrates for waterquality assessment. Limnologica 35: 169–176.
[7] AQEM Consortium (2002). Manual for the Application of the AQEM System. A Comprehensive Method to Assess European Streams Using Benthic Macroinvertebrates, Developed for the Purpose of the Water Framework Directive. Duisburg, Germany: AQEM Consortium.
[8] WFD (2000). The EU Water Framework Directive - 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy. Official Journal of the European Communities: L 327, 22.12.2000.
[9] Kazancı N, Türkmen G, Ertunç Ö, Ekingen P, Öz B, Gültutan Y (2010b). Assessment of ecological quality of Yeşilırmak River (Turkey) by using macroinvertebrate-based methods in the content of Water Framework Directive. Review of Hydrobiology 3: 89–110 (article in Turkish with an abstract in English.
[10] Kazancı N (1993). Protection of Environment and Nature in Köyceğiz-Dalyan, Final Report of Hydrobiological Subproject (GTZ). Darmstadt, Germany: Hydrobiological Subproject (GTZ) GmbH.
[11] Kazancı N, Girgin S, Dügel M, Oğuzkurt D (1997). Inland Waters of Turkey Series II: Biotic Index Methods for Evaluating Environmental Quality of Running Waters. Ankara, Turkey: Imaj Press.
[12] Kazancı N, Dügel M, Girgin S (2008). Determination of indicator genera of benthic macroinvertebrate communities in running waters in western Turkey. Review of Hydrobiology 1: 1–16.
[13] Kazancı N, Ekingen P, Türkmen G, Ertunç Ö, Dügel M, Gültutan Y (2010a). Assessment of ecological quality of Aksu Stream (Giresun, Turkey) in Eastern Black Sea Region by using Water Framework Directive (WFD) methods based on benthic macroinvertebrates. Review of Hydrobiology 3: 165–18
[14] Kazancı N, Türkmen G, Bolat HA (2011). Habitat characteristics of endangered species Marthamea vitripennis (Burmeister 1839) (Insecta, Plecoptera). Review of Hydrobiology 5: 1–18.
[15] Kazancı N, Türkmen G, Ekingen P, Başören Ö (2013). Preparation of a biotic index (Yeşilırmak-BMWP) for water quality monitoring of Yeşilırmak River (Turkey) by using benthic macroinvertebrates. Review of Hydrobiology 6: 1–29.
[16] Duran, M., Tuzen, M., and Kayım, M. 2003. Exploration of biological richness and water quality of stream Kelkit, Tokat-Turkey, Fresenius Envir. Bull. 12(4), 368-375.
[17] Duran, M., M. Suiçmez, M. Kayım ve Ç. Kaynar, 2006. “Preliminary analysis of the biological characteristics of Alaemon elegans (Decapoda, Palaemonidae) in the Coast of Sinop, BlackSea, N. TURKEY”. Pakistan Journal of Biological Science. 9 (5), 848 - 853
[18] Duran M, Suicmez M (2007). Utilization of both benthic macroinvertebrates and physicochemical parameters for evaluating water quality of the Stream Çekerek (Tokat, Turkey). J Environ Biol 28: 231–236.
[19] Kalyoncu H, Zeybek M (2011). An application of different biotic and diversity indices for assessing water quality: a case study in the rivers Çukurca and Isparta (Turkey). Afr J Agric Res 6: 19–27.
[20] Ekingen P, Kazancı N (2012). Benthic macroinvertebrate fauna of the Aksu Stream (Giresun, Turkey) and habitat quality assessment based on European Union Water Framework Directive criteria. Review of Hydrobiology 5: 35–55.
[21] Arslan, N., Salur,A., Kalyoncu, H., Mercan, D., Barişik, B., Odabaşi, A.D., 2016. The use of BMWP and ASPT indices for evaluation of water quality according to macroinvertebrates in Kucuk Menderes River (Turkey). Biologia, Volume 71, Issue 1 (Jan 2016), 117-227.
[22] 2014. Havza izleme ve referans noktalarrının belirlenmesi projesi-Antalya Havzası,2014. T.C. Orman Su İşleri Bakanlığı, Su Yönetimi Genel Müdürlüğü, Ankara.
[23] 2015. Türkiye’de Havza Bazında Hassas Alanların ve Su Kalite Hedeflerinin Belirlenmesi, Nehir Su Kütlelerinde Biyolojik İzleme Çalışmaları (Antalya, Asi, Burdur, Ceyhan, Dicle, Firat, Kizilirmak, Seyhan ve Van Havzalari), T.C. Orman Su İşleri Bakanlığı, Su Yönetimi Genel Müdürlüğü, Ankara. 2015.
[24] APHA (1998). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 20th ed. Washington, DC, USA: American Public Health Association.
[25] Klee O (1990). Wasser untersuchen. Biologische Arbeitsbücher 42. Heidelberg/Wiesbaden, Germany: Verlag Quelle & Meyer (book in German).
[26] Paisley, M. F., Trigg, D. J., & Walley, W. J. 2013. Revision of the Biological Monitoring Working Party (BMWP) score system: Derivation of present-only and abundance-related scores from field data. River Research and Applications.