Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 30127
Traction Behavior of Linear Piezo-Viscous Lubricants in Rough Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication Contacts

Authors: Punit Kumar, Niraj Kumar

Abstract:

The traction behavior of lubricants with the linear pressure-viscosity response in EHL line contacts is investigated numerically for smooth as well as rough surfaces. The analysis involves the simultaneous solution of Reynolds, elasticity and energy equations along with the computation of lubricant properties and surface temperatures. The temperature modified Doolittle-Tait equations are used to calculate viscosity and density as functions of fluid pressure and temperature, while Carreau model is used to describe the lubricant rheology. The surface roughness is assumed to be sinusoidal and it is present on the nearly stationary surface in near-pure sliding EHL conjunction. The linear P-V oil is found to yield much lower traction coefficients and slightly thicker EHL films as compared to the synthetic oil for a given set of dimensionless speed and load parameters. Besides, the increase in traction coefficient attributed to surface roughness is much lower for the former case. The present analysis emphasizes the importance of employing realistic pressure-viscosity response for accurate prediction of EHL traction.

Keywords: EHL, linear pressure-viscosity, surface roughness, traction, water/glycol.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1125497

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 834

References:


[1] Kumar, P., Bair, S., Krupka, I., and Hartl, M., 2010, “Newtonian Quantitative Elastohydrodynamic Film Thickness with Linear Piezoviscosity,” Tribol. Int., vol.43, pp. 2159-2165.
[2] Spikes, H. A., 1987, “Wear and fatigue problems in connection with water-based hydraulic fluids,” J Synthetic Lubrication, vol. 4, pp. 115-135
[3] Kumar, P., and Khonsari, M. M., 2009, “On the Role of Lubricant Rheology and Piezo-viscous Properties in Line and Point Contact EHL,” Tribol. Int., vol. 42, pp. 1522-1530.
[4] Bair, S., and Qureshi, F., 2003, “The Generalized Newtonian Fluid Model and Elastohydrodynamic Film Thickness,” ASME J. Tribol., vol. 125, pp. 70–75.
[5] Bair S., 2007, High Pressure Rheology for Quantitative Elastohydrodynamics Tribology and Interface Engineering Series 54, Elsevier Press, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
[6] Chapkov, A. D., Bair, S., Cann, P., and Lubrecht, A. A., 2007, “Film Thickness in Point Contacts under Generalized Newtonian EHL Conditions: Numerical and Experimental Analysis,” Tribol. Int., vol. 40, pp. 1474-1478.
[7] Jang, J. Y., Khonsari, M. M., and Bair, S., 2007, “On the elastohydrodynamic analysis of shear-thinning fluids,” Proc. Roy. Soc. London, vol. 463, pp. 3271-3290.
[8] Liu, Y., Wnag, Q. J., and Bair, S., 2007, “Vergne P, A Quantitative Solution for the Full Shear-Thinning EHL Point Contact Problem Including Traction,” Tribol. Letters, vol. 28, pp. 171-181.
[9] Krupka, I., Kumar, P., Bair, S., Khonsari, M. M., and Hartl M, 2010, “The Effect of Load (Pressure) For Quantitative EHL Film Thickness,” Tribol. Letters, vol. 37, pp. 613-622.
[10] Sui, P. C., and Sadeghi, F., 1991, “Non-Newtonian Thermal Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication,” ASME J. Tribol., vol. 113, pp. 390-397.
[11] Salehizadeh, H., and Saka, N., 1991, “Thermal Non-Newtonian Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication of Rolling Line Contacts,” ASME J. Tribol., vol. 113, pp. 181-191.
[12] Wang, S., Conry, T. F., and Cusano, C., 1992, “Thermal Non-Newtonian Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication of Line Contacts Under Simple Sliding Conditions,” ASME J. Tribol., vol. 114, pp. 317-327.
[13] Hsiao, H. S., and Hamrock, B. J., 1992, “A Complete Solution for Thermal Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication of Line Contacts Using Circular Non-Newtonian Fluid Model” ASME J. Tribol., vol. 114, pp. 540-552.
[14] Kumar, P., and Khonsari, M. M., 2008, “Combined Effects of Shear Thinning and Viscous Heating on EHL Characteristics of Rolling/Sliding Line Contact,” ASME J. Tribol., vol. 130, pp. 041505-1-13.
[15] Venner, C. H. and Napel, W. E. T., 1992, "Surface roughness effects in an EHL line contact," ASME J. Tribol., vol. 114, pp. 616–22
[16] Kweh, C. C., Patching, M. J., Evans, H. P., Snidle, R. W., 1992, "Simulation of elastohydrodynamic contacts between rough surfaces," ASME J. Tribol.. vol. 114, pp. 412-419,
[17] Huang, P. and Wen, S., 1992, "Study on oil film thickness and pressure distribution of micro-EHL," ASME J. Tribol., vol. 114, pp. 42-46.
[18] Hooke, C. J., 1998, "Surface roughness modification in elastohydrodynamic line contacts operating in the elastic piezoviscous regime," Proc. IMechE J. Eng. Tribol., vol. 212, pp. 145-157.
[19] Kaneta, M., Nishikawa, H., 1999, "Experimental study on microelastohydrodynamic lubrication," Proc. IMechE J. Eng. Tribol., vol. 213, pp. 371-381.
[20] Kumar, P., and Kalita, T. J., 2015, “Transient EHL Film Thickness During Normal Approach Considering Shear-thinning and Linear Piezo-viscous Oils,” ASME J. Tribol., vol. 137, pp. 021504/1-7.