Well-Being and Helping Technology for Retired Population in Finland
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 33122
Well-Being and Helping Technology for Retired Population in Finland

Authors: R. Pääkkönen, L. Korpinen

Abstract:

This study aimed to evaluate parameters influencing well-being and how to maintain well-being as long as possible after retirement. There is contradictory information on the health changes after retirement in Finland. This work is based on interviews, statistics, and literature evaluation of Finland. Most often, balance, multitasking reaction time, and adaptation of vision in dim and darks areas are worsened. Slowing is one characteristic that is difficult to measure properly. The most important is try to determine ways to manage daily activities and symptoms of disease after retirement. Medicine is advancing, problems are often also on the economic side. Information of technical aids is important. It is worth planning a retirement age.

Keywords: Retirement, working, aging, wellness.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1125477

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1138

References:


[1] Statistical yearbook on pensioners in Finland 2014. Official statistics, Finnish Centre of Pensions and the Social Insurance Institution of Finland. Juvenes Print- Suomen yliopistopaino, Helsinki 2015. 138 p.
[2] Heikkinen, E.: Iäkkäiden ihmisten terveys ja toimintakyky. Duodecim. Terveyskirjasto 18.7.2005.
[3] Sahlgren G.: Work longer, live healthier. IEA discussion paper, no 46. May 2013. 52 s.
[4] J. Seitsamo, Retirement transition and well-being. Dissertation. People and work. Research reports 76. Finnish Institute of Occupational health, Helsinki Tampereen yliopistopaino. 2007. 63 s.
[5] M. Tervonen, Kun pääsis eläkkeelle—Työuran jatkaminen emootioiden näkökulmasta. Progradu. Turun kauppakorkeakoulu. Turun yliopisto 2014. 102 s.
[6] S. Koskinen, A. Lundqvist, and N. Ristiluoma, et al. Terveys, toimintakyky ja hyvinvointi Suomessa 2011. Terveyden ja hyvinvoinnin laitos (THL), Raportti 68/2012, 290 sivua. Helsinki 2012.
[7] A. Hajek, H. König, Longitudinal predictors of functional impairment in older adults in Europe—Evidence from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe PLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0146967 January 19, 2016.
[8] A. Supan, K. Hank, H. Jurges, and M. Schröder, Introduction: Empirical research on health, ageing and retirement in Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 293–300, Mon. Year. DOI:10.1177/1350506809341510 http://esp.sagepub.com.
[9] H. Tanhua, N. Knape, Sosiaalimenot ja rahoitus 2013. Tilastoraportti. Terveyden ja hyvinvoinnin laitos, Helsinki 2015. https://www.julkari.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/125696/Sosiaalimenot%20ja%20rahoitus%202013%20tilastoraportti.pdf?sequence=1
[10] Suomen yrittäjät: Seniorit pk-yrityksissä. http://www.yrittajat.fi/fi-FI/suomenyrittajat/tutkimustoiminta/seniorit_pk_yrityksissa/
[11] Suomen yrittäjät: Yrittäjien tulot ja verot 2014. http://www.yrittajat.fi/fi-FI/suomenyrittajat/tutkimustoiminta/yrittajien-tulot-ja-verot-2014/
[12] Elinajan odote Suomessa 1751-2010. Terveyskirjasto. Duodecim. http://www.terveyskirjasto.fi/terveyskirjasto/tk.koti?p_artikkeli=ldk00474
[13] Suomen virallinen tilasto (SVT): Työssäkäynti (verkkojulkaisu). ISSN=1798-5528. Helsinki: Tilastokeskus (viitattu: 11.4.2016). Read 11 April 2016: http://www.stat.fi/til/tyokay/
[14] AON Consulting: European Employee Benefits Benchmark Expectations vs. Reality: Meeting Europe’s Retirement Challenge.
[15] Hiilamo, H., Hiilamo, K.: Hoivataistelu. Kirjapaja. Tallinna Raamatutrükikoda, Viro 2015. 150 s
[16] K. Vänni, A. Korpela, Role of social robotics in supporting employees and advancing productivity. Social robotics 7th international conference ICSR 2015 Paris October 26-30 2015, 674-683.
[17] F. B. Kristensen, K. Lampe, D. L. Chase, et al., Practical tools and methods for health technology assessment in Europe: structures, methodologies, and tools developed by the European Network for Health Technology Assessment, EUnetHTA. Int J Technol Assess Health Care, vol. 25, suppl. 2, pp.1–8, Dec. Year. doi: 10.1017/S0266462309990626.
[18] R. Cowan, B. Fregly, M. Boninger, et al., Recent trends in assistive technology for mobility. Journal of Neuro Engineering and Rehabilitation, vol. 9, no. 20, DOI: 10.1186/1743-0003-9-20
[19] R. Linturi, O. Kuusi, and T. Ahlqvist, Suomen sata uutta mahdollisuutta: Radikaalit teknologiset ratkaisut. Eduskunnan tulevaisuusvaliokunnan julkaisu 6/2013.
[20] L. Korpinen, R. Pääkkönen, and F. Gobba, Accidents and close call situations connected to the use of mobile phones in working-age people ≥ 50 years old. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology. International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering, vol 9, no. 5, pp. 1402–1405, Mon. 2015.