Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 30761
Supplier Selection by Considering Cost and Reliability

Authors: K. -H. Yang


Supplier selection problem is one of the important issues of supply chain problems. Two categories of methodologies include qualitative and quantitative approaches which can be applied to supplier selection problems. However, due to the complexities of the problem and lacking of reliable and quantitative data, qualitative approaches are more than quantitative approaches. This study considers operational cost and supplier’s reliability factor and solves the problem by using a quantitative approach. A mixed integer programming model is the primary analytic tool. Analyses of different scenarios with variable cost and reliability structures show that the effectiveness of this approach to the supplier selection problem.

Keywords: Supplier Selection, mixed integer programming, quantitative approach, supplier’s reliability

Digital Object Identifier (DOI):

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1806


[1] C. A. Weber, J. R. Current, and W.C. Benton, “Vendor selection criteria and methods,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 50, 1991, pp. 2–18.
[2] S. H. Ghodsypour and C. Ó. Brien, “The total cost of logistics in supplier selection, under conditions of multiple sourcing, multiple criteria and capacity constraint,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 73, no. 1, 2001, pp. 15-27.
[3] A. Ravi Ravindran, R. Ufuk Bilsel, V. Wadhwa and T. Yang, “Risk adjusted multicriteria supplier selection models with applications,” International Journal of Production Research, vol. 48, no. 2, 2010, pp. 405-424.
[4] J. Chai, J. N. K. Liu, and E. W. T. Ngai, “Application of decision-making techniques in supplier selection: A systematic review of literature,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 40, 2013, pp. 3872-3885.
[5] W. Ho, X. Xu, and P.K. Dey, “Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: A literature review,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 202, no. 1, 2010, pp. 16-24.
[6] Z. Degraeve, E. Labro, and F. Roodhooft, “An evalution of supplier selection methods from a total cost of ownership perspective,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 125, no. 1, 2000, pp. 34-58.
[7] L. D. Boer, E. Labro, and P. Morlacchi, “A review of methods supporting supplier selection,” European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, vol. 7, no. 2, 2001, pp. 75-89.
[8] R. R. Levary, “Using the analytic hierarchy process to rank foreign suppliers based on supply risks,” Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol. 55, no. 2, 2008, pp. 535-542.
[9] C. Gencer and D. Gürpinar, “Analytic network process in supplier selection: A case study in an electronic firm,” Applied Mathematical Modelling, vol. 31, no. 11, 2007, pp. 2475-2486.
[10] C. -T. Chen, C.-T. Lin, and S.-F. Huang, “A fuzzy approach for supplier evaluation and selection in supply chain management,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 102, 2006, pp. 289-301.
[11] W. L. Ng, “An efficient and simple model for multiple criteria supplier selection problem,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 186, 2008, pp. 1059-1067.
[12] R. Ramanathan, “Supplier selection problem: integrating DEA with the approaches of total cost of ownership and AHP,” Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, vol. 12, no 4, 2007, pp. 258 - 261.
[13] R. F. Saen, “A new mathematical approach for suppliers selection: Accounting for non-homogeneity is important,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 185, no.1, 2007, pp. 84-95.
[14] A. J.Ruiz-Torres, F. Mahmood, and A. Z. Zeng, “Supplier selection model with contingency planning for supplier failures,” Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol. 66, no. 2, 2013, pp. 374-382.
[15] K. Patra and S.K. Mondal, “Multi-item Supplier Selection Model with Fuzzy Risk Analysis Studied by Possibility and Necessity Constraints”, Fuzzy Information and Engineering, vol. 7, no. 4, 2015, pp. 451-474.